|
thatbastardken posted:Up until she took dramatic action no-one in the party was paying any attention. The pre-rapist wasn't going to answer honestly, and the girl was close to blackout drunk and couldn't speak for herself. If Allison wasn't indestructible and super strong, just a concerned citizen, that girl would have been the victim of a serious crime after douchebag pushed her out of the way. Yes, and by choking him, she does manage to make a scene, but she makes the scene about her and not about him. Hell, when she leaves, some of the other guests are looking sympathetic towards the guy, which is the exact opposite of what she wanted. The thing is, this guy is a symptom of a social problem, and you don't solve social problems by choking people. If on the other hand, she had just made a scene like a normal person might, sans choaking, then peoples reactions would have been on what the guy was actually doing. She's a superhero at a freaking superhero themed costume party, what better place to demonstrate how she'd like other people to react to this sort of thing? Other people can't just go around choking strangers, so everyone at the party comes out of this with nothing. She fixes this problem, but does nothing to stop the real problem. Pavlov fucked around with this message at 05:06 on Jun 18, 2014 |
# ¿ Jun 18, 2014 05:03 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 15:50 |
|
Phylodox posted:Yeah, no, I don't think so. As everyone at the party was so loving eager to point out, Miles is a dude they know and like. No amount of talking or convincing is going to get them to believe he's a potential date rapist. All Allison would have done was gotten into a stupid, circular, pointless argument about how he's a cool dude and cool dudes don't rape. Besides, whose word are you going to take? Miles, who's a totally cool dude, or some strange chick whose name nobody even knows and who's obviously drunk? That was the whole point of that whole vignette. Nobody thinks of rapists as people they know. But even if you're right, how is that any different than what happened anyway? I'm pretty sure the same conversation that happened in the comic would have happened anyway, except Alison would would have looked a bit less crazy, and the dude a bit less like a victim himself. People seem a little more likely to listen to someone who, from their perspective, didn't just super-power strangle one of their friends without warning.
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2014 05:27 |
|
Phylodox posted:Because it isn't about them? Miles is trying to rape a girl. Who the gently caress wants to stop and have a conversation about it?!? Allison's first priority was stopping the date rape from happening and then making sure that poor girl got home safely. gently caress people who want to defend date rapists. gently caress people who want to stop and talk about it and maybe discuss how there are two sides to every story, man. Especially gently caress Violet, who would rather treat her friend like poo poo than believe some guy she takes a class with could be a lovely date raping rear end in a top hat. No, the real problem is that she's the only one doing anything about it in the first place. The kind of change Alison really wants is the kind where people stop that kind of thing from happening without her even being there. Of course all the party-goers aren't going to make a full 180 on the spot, no matter what she says. But it really is her impact on the rest of them that decides how successful she is in the long run. If one or two of them actually look out for similar things in the future, or get indignant about it themselves, then that's actual social change, even if only on the small scale. That's how you beat rape culture as opposed to just beating rapeists. And that's the bit that Alison's been failing to accomplish.
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2014 06:20 |
|
Phylodox posted:No. You don't try to effect change on a social level when there's an almost-rape victim sobbing in the corner. What, you want her to give a stern lecture? Engage in a spirited debate? Convene some sort of round table discussion? gently caress all of that. She choked out Miles and shamed everyone at the party by bringing attention to their inaction and not compromising in the face of their shittiness. If any of those assholes don't have the wherewithal to feel shame at that, then nothing she would have said would have done anything, anyways. Mate, she's not sobbing, just drunk. I'm just suggesting that if Alison did exactly what she did, minus the assault, she might accomplish a little something more. It's easy to say something like, "gently caress all these people if they don't immediately get it then they're not worth the breath", but if you do that, you just get the exact same problems at next week's party.
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2014 06:58 |
|
Captain Bravo posted:And the most important thing, as a reader, we don't know for a fact that he is a bad guy.
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2014 19:56 |
|
I guess I'll be honest, when I first saw Miles, I didn't notice anything off about him either. I thought Alison was storming off to respond to that one text. I mean, his face kind of looks less like a rapist's, and more like the author got lazy with his anatomy. It's kind of like it's just... melting off to the side there. If you cover up the face, they pretty much look like a normal drunk couple.
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2014 22:31 |
|
I feel like Alison is the kind of person where if she thought he was being serious, she would have been over to help him a lot sooner.
|
# ¿ Jun 26, 2014 23:30 |
|
"BRB getting murdured #fml #cleaversadick"
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2014 00:38 |
|
I bet he's dead on literally the next page.
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2014 18:43 |
|
Wait, even if the old guy was a dick, why would she kill him for being the judge at the trial? If it was a real criminal trial, the judge didn't actually decide if the boys were innocent or not, the jury did. The judge would have a say in sentencing, but that's only if they were found guilty to begin with. Otherwise the old dude probably just spent the whole trial looking stern and occasionally saying "sustained" and "overruled".
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2014 14:49 |
|
What is an IVS?
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2014 15:31 |
|
Hah! And here I was wracking my brain for legal terminology.
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2014 15:41 |
|
That actually brings up a good point. Why is IVS killing people associated with a small town rape trial? I know "super powers don't solve social problems" is a running theme, but stabbing a bunch of high-profile politicians and lawmakers instead actually might accomplish some of that. Hell, approval ratings for the American congress are so low right now, I think you'd find a lot of people who would be totally fine with it.
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2014 15:52 |
|
ashweh posted:If IVS is from around the area, maybe she knows the daughters that are mentioned, and about why they don't go to visit their parents. Or she is their daughter. BAM! Irony stab!
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2014 17:00 |
|
One of the boys said that that the trial was all over, and the news report of their deaths said charged not convicted, so I think it's safe to assume they were found innocent. Also, I got the impression that IVS was moreso just asking permission to go about killing, because lets be honest, the backlash from the death of those boys is going to come back around to the victim girl eventually, so it'd be rude not to get her OK first.
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2014 17:55 |
|
I agree with Hollismason that the comic is kind of laying it on heavy with the social issues bit. If the next scene has Allison getting cat-called by construction workers, who she then lectures on heteronormative values, it wouldn't really be out of place with the current pacing. I forgive it for that though, because it's a bi-weakly web comic, and if it really wanted to go into detail on all these issues, it might as well declare 2014 "The Year of the Rape Culture" and get nothing else done. I'd rather it be a bit expedited than becoming a slog.
Pavlov fucked around with this message at 20:51 on Jul 2, 2014 |
# ¿ Jul 2, 2014 18:40 |
|
A big flaming stink posted:also being bombarded by the thought process of everyone around you might inhibit a sense of individuality. That might have something to do with why he seems so uncomfortable with personal sexuality.
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2014 13:05 |
|
Flesh Forge posted:Patrick is a fresh take on the telepath gimmick but he really doesn't make sense unless he literally has Asperger's syndrome. Asperger's telepathy is actually a pretty cool idea.
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2014 21:02 |
|
Captain Bravo posted:This is why I've been frustrated with the comic for this arc. I loved Cleaver, especially the talk with him. The protesters were... a little off, but overall still pretty good. But holy poo poo the party and the judge are just terrible. Absolutely terrible. "This guy is a date rapist. You know this not only because he's trying to date-rape this girl, but also because he looks like a bro, and is unnaturally aggressive towards the invincible main character, and is also a skeevy whiny bitch. This judge let the rapists get off. He did so because he's a wife-beater, definitely sexist and probably an old southern racist too, hell lets toss in some slight implications of child abuse and pedophilia while we're at it!" I understand the sentiment, but I think I want to see how the arc resolves before judging it too thoroughly. There's still a chance that the heavy-handedness will be justified.
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2014 15:11 |
|
Yeah, I mean, who would have thought that the one person we know of with invisibility powers ended up being the secret invisible killer?
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2014 23:46 |
|
Yes, but at least she's a funny jerk this time. Also this might actually be the kind of thing he needs to hear.
|
# ¿ Aug 8, 2014 13:43 |
|
And every page becomes twice as good when I remember he's still using the chipmunk voice. Imagine Alvin saying "We all got to be loving hipsters about everything."
|
# ¿ Aug 13, 2014 14:00 |
|
A big flaming stink posted:well honestly a murderspree in israel's government by a superhero might not be that bad of an idea TwoPair posted:Allison is frustrating because she's going to school looking for a grand master theory to fix the world I now want to see a chapter where Alison is introduced to a "LessWrong" style techno-singularity cult.
|
# ¿ Aug 25, 2014 13:08 |
|
RiotGearEpsilon posted:It does. But it is so, so boring to actually do. I'll agree there. The results can be rad but the actual work can be tedious as gently caress.
|
# ¿ Aug 26, 2014 15:52 |
|
Hollismason posted:She's not probably immune to tear gas, why would you not fill the room with tear gas first then throw water balloons filled with paint or whatever once you see her displace the smoke. Well, she seems to be able to make her gear invisible too, and she's been living the Hall of Justice for the last few years so if she had a gasmask it wouldn't surprise me. Honestly paint doesn't make much sense when you think about it either. If you can make your cloths invisible, why couldn't you make the paint on your cloths invisible too?
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2014 04:15 |
|
I really hope she just has a good sense of humor and didn't just pull a serious "all men are rapists".
|
# ¿ Sep 16, 2014 14:23 |
|
ChairMaster posted:Man I can't believe that there are people who actually managed to read that line like that. She said that because "boys" carries an connotation of innocence to it, whereas "rapists" does not, which makes it more accurate. Well, she's being pretty strangely tongue-in-cheek this page, its hard to tell exactly how serious she's being about any of it (except, perhaps, for the last bit). If she's serious about the cop bit, its not too much of a stretch to think she might be serious about the "boys, rapists, technically different" bit.
|
# ¿ Sep 16, 2014 16:07 |
|
Small Frozen Thing posted:You've got a persecution complex dude. Either that or you're complete rear end at reading comprehension. Haha what? For saying it's possible that the serial killer could have some kind-of-lovely views hidden behind dismissive humor? If it makes you feel better I could shut up about it.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2014 00:39 |
|
At this point I regret even bringing up the idea, which I only ever considered an off-hand possibility in the first place. People really love to dig into things in this thread it looks like.
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2014 18:39 |
|
SlothfulCobra posted:Maybe if she went after some white-collar criminals instead of murdering stupid kids, I'd like her more. If she started offing lobbyists I'd be half way to starting her up a fanclub.
|
# ¿ Sep 19, 2014 16:06 |
|
Captain Bravo posted:Ahhhahahaha! Holy poo poo, you think that thousands of rounds of ammunition and loving grenades are easier to get ahold of than a big lock? I just... I just don't even... I don't even know how to respond to that, other than with mockery. Girl had loving tanks in her back yard. Kind of surprising she knows how to install auto-shutting barn doors though.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 02:11 |
|
Actually she never paid them, because she hired the only mercenary company dumb enough not to take payment upfront.
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2014 17:36 |
|
Ask her if all men are rapists.
|
# ¿ Oct 3, 2014 05:24 |
|
Well that would be one way to get her guidance councilor to shut up.
|
# ¿ Oct 5, 2014 17:52 |
|
McSpanky posted:Nihilists keep existing (and annoying the rest of us with their dreary blather) despite coming to the conclusion that all meaning and value in life are arbitrary and artificial. Somewhere along the way they still manage to extract practical, functional values and motivations out of their existence, no matter how subjective they may be. Similarly, whether the ultimate source of society's values are artificial or not, in any practical consideration, doesn't loving matter. Any philosophy that contributes nothing to real life, especially in the realm of crime and law, is about as useful as an rear end in a top hat on my shoulder. On the other hand, I'm not sure what any of this has to do with those kickin construction bots over there.
|
# ¿ Oct 16, 2014 18:16 |
|
Brought To You By posted:It's almost like those robots are tiny posters on their own terrible forum. That's probably scary close to what being in an actual hive-mind is really like.
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2014 16:33 |
|
I always thought idea of stopping an AI with logical contradictions was kind of silly. Any properly designed logic engine is going to be able to handle Undefined truth values. For some reason AIs in media all seem to use raw booleans and have 0 catch blocks. Edit: Pshh wow for a second there I forgot this wasn't a programming thread. Pavlov fucked around with this message at 18:38 on Oct 28, 2014 |
# ¿ Oct 28, 2014 18:26 |
|
The best part of that is it's actually oddly close to what it really feels like trying to program a complex and ambiguously defined system. I wasn't really expecting my social justice superhero comic to understand me as a programmer today.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2014 16:35 |
|
Hello, I still read the comic but I stopped reading this thread a while ago because of the awful bickering people would start at the slightest provocation. Has it gotten better?
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2015 19:36 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 15:50 |
|
Trast posted:Not even a chance. Ok I guess I'll try again next year.
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2015 21:01 |