Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

I've never read the Bible.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Please don't listen to anyone's ideas fof what you should read so you know the Western canon and just read books that are good in no particular order.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

A Rambling Vagrant posted:

When you think about it, TS Eliot is p. much a K-Mart brand William Carlos Williams.

Agreed.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

poisonpill posted:

Pynchon is just a knockoff DeLillo. Discuss.

Agreed.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

When you think about it Umberto Eco is just a poor man's G. K. Chesterton.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

mallamp posted:

Actually you do have to read whole western canon. In original languages.

I'm going to read the Epic of Gilgamesh in its original Assyrian/SUmerian/possibly Hittite in places.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Don't read Lot 49 to get an idea of Pynchon's style because it's not very good. Read Gravity's Rainbow and if you don't like it stop reading it but you'll probably like it.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

IMO you'll end up with a way more satisfying, enjoyable, and Pynchony book reading the first 150 pages of Gravity's Rainbow than reading the 150 pages of Lot 49.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Smoking Crow posted:

you got the joke

Please don't joke about books and reading.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Memorise Hamlet and constantly quote things from it even when they're not very relevant.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Basically do what I do for the Simpsons, but for Hamlet.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

English is dead.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Alternatively: books about those things are for nerds and English is dead.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

The last good English language literature was Beowulf.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

JackKnight posted:

Perhaps I should have clarified more. The degeneration of language is certainly debatable, and there are good points for both sides. I should probably have made the point that less and less people are using English to its full potential. Sure more and more people are literate, but literacy is just a metric for basic reading comprehension.

Also I currently read scifi and fantasy, but I have read thousands of books in my life, lol. I never did enjoy those introspective types of books, but I didn't shy away from them either. I used to read extremely voraciously and indiscriminately. I even got a lot of the way through an encyclopedia. :-D

Doesn't change the fact that the brain falls into a lazy state with disuse. :-(

You seem to have this weird thing where you think that memorising Hamlet or reading an encyclopaedia make you smart but they reallly don't. Reading broadly and thinking critically about what you read will improve your thinking probably, not rote learning crap or reading something that won't engage you and you almost certainly won't take in.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

I was saying Boo-urns.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

toanoradian posted:

If I love Invisible Cities by Calvino, for its incredible descriptions of imaginary concepts and the sheer sense of awe it inspires, what other relatively thin book would I enjoy? I am currently chewing on the delicious buffet that is Calvino's Italian Folktales and by god, I love folktales from foreign countries.

Dictionary of the Khazars by Milorad Pavic is wonderful and very folk tale-y and reminds me a lot of Borges who Earwicker suggested but I just realised you said thin so err not that I guess. Read Borges.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

It's pretty groundbreaking.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Of course there's some point other than his final inference otherwise he woulldn't write the book. He didn't come up with the idea then write 100 pages of faff to make it seem good, he's trying to logically expound the point that there's a fundamental flaw in the way we think about language, and use it to talk about philosophy, while recognising the fact that in doing so he is using language to talk about philosophy.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

I jus tfinished Mason & Dixon and it's pretty fantastic I'd recommend it for those of you that like books.

I'm nowe reading The Palace of Dreams by Ismail Kadare which I have just discovered is an English translation of the French translation of the original Albanian and I think that's why it reads sort of weird but the ideas seem cool. Also the version I have has a quote from the book on the front and having read the first two chapters, then that quote, I think I now know exactly what is going to happen.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

It's pretty good it's just stilted I guess? I probably wouldn't give it much thought if I hadn't realised I was reading a translation of a translation just before I started. I might see if I can pick up Broken April in French since it looks like Kadare was explicitly on board in the French translation process. Should I go for BRoken April or another, better one?

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

I thought the Metamorphosis was dull and every other story was great in the collection I read

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

I'm reading The collected Father Brown mysteries by G K CHesterton and they're really cool because if there's ever an atheist in the story you know he did the crimes because he has no morals to stop him from murdering wantonly. Also they're a lot better than Sherlock Holmes and Arthur COnan Doyle drools, while Gilbert Keith Chesterton, rules.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

A Rambling Vagrant posted:

If you ignore the fact that he was an antisemite & hated pretty much everything that both existed & wasn't also beer, England, or Catholicism(ex: Germans, Continental Philosophy, Voltaire, Marx, Protestantism, cats, the Japanese, people who opposed toll roads, Socialists, Spiritualists, Baptists, Darwin, Queen Elizabeth, Anarchists, Capitalists, Atheists, Pacifists, heretics, boring people) then GK Chesterton's oeuvre becomes a bottomless well of some of the finest prose that the English language has to offer.

The best Father Brown stories are the ones where someone is explicitly one of these things, and it is later revealed they secretly are another as well and that is why they did the murder. Eg when the guy tricks a woman into falling down a lift shaft and it is because he has invented his own sun worship religion and also because he is secretly AMerican. Also the murdered person's sister tried to steal all her money because she's a woman.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

The best Kafka story is the one where the orangutan can talk and it uses this skill to do nothing of interest.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

YOu're fundamentally broken if you don't love it with all your heart, soul and mind I'm afraid. You might as well be dead. Heller reaches almost Chestertonian levels of cool prose.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Please only conform to the established literary hierarchy in this thread.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Maybe if George Ar Ar Martin had wanted to write a good book about the horrors of war he shou;ldn't have written such a lovely book.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

It's a piece of poo.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Falstaff Infection posted:

In order to qualify as a conscientious objector in the U.S., you have to object to war in general, not just a specific war.

They probably make sure to check that you object to all wars and not just the current one by getting you to write a short story and if it seems like you don't like war from that, then you can sit it out.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

It's okay.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

I'm reading Catcher in the Rye and it is also okay.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

I'm a strong vegetarian and cannot handle books with meat based themes, any recommendations? I tried reading Life of Pi and when he said something about how the tiger might eat him I had to put it down in disgust.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011


Reported.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

YOu're only allowed to talk about books I approve of in this thread, being good literature has nothing to do with it.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

Dystram posted:

No, my friend, it is not capital L literature according to some arbitrary standard, hence, it is a bad book, for the pretension of the thread must be maintained. People with anime avatars always have good, and correct opinions.

The people with anime avatars don't make the decisions about what is and isn't literature, I do.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

I just want to escape from my lovely life and that's why I read about the Game of THrones universe, where everyone dies for minor things that happen to them, people are constantly having sex with children, and the writing is really really bad.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

I choose to read this instead of that depressing poo poo like INvisible Cities by Italo Calvino, a series of descriptions of impossible and fantastic cities in which no one dies, not a single child is had sex with, and the writing is serenely beautiful at times.

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

I'm reading The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman by Laurence Stern and the fact that this book was written in the mid 1700s is incredible. 40 pages in and he keeps getting distracted from narrating his birth, he almost started writing about his baptism then remembered that he'd need to be born before he was baptised, then in the next chapter berated the reader for not reading closely enough to realise that his mother couldn't possibly be Catholic, because Catholics have devised a method for baptising in the womb by squirting water on the foetus.

All this 150 years before Joyce!!!!!!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CestMoi
Sep 16, 2011

O cool it was actually popular at the time? I just assumed it was one of those things that was very ahead of the curve and it got rediscovered in the 20th century or something.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply