|
Read some real literature says the guy with the anime avatar. OK, Mr. Anime Dude, I will. Oh wait I already do. OK, bye! Damo fucked around with this message at 03:31 on Jun 18, 2014 |
# ¿ Jun 18, 2014 03:27 |
|
|
# ¿ May 6, 2024 03:46 |
|
OK, I will! Has anyone read that annotated version Lolita? Would you recommend it for someone who hasn't read it before, or is it better for someone already familiar with the novel?
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2014 03:48 |
|
Yeah, makes sense. I wonder though if the annotations are written in such a way that I can just ignore them the first time through. I should just crack it open at the store the next chance I get and check it out.
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2014 04:01 |
|
Wait, that can't be serious. 3 L. Ron Hubbard and 4 Ayn Rand books in the reader's Top 10? It must have been an online vote bombed by conservative scientologists. Or at least, conservatives with really piss poor taste in sci-fi novels. That's loving incredible.
|
# ¿ Nov 26, 2014 10:46 |
|
Not so much that, but just how awful the selections are. I'd expect them to be awful, but not that bad. Other lists aren't nearly so stacked with poo poo.
|
# ¿ Nov 26, 2014 13:18 |
|
|
# ¿ May 6, 2024 03:46 |
|
Earwicker posted:eh I've seen "Readers polls" where 7 out of the top 10 best books ever were the harry potter books and the other 3 were twilight books. they are often stacked with poo poo just in different directions At the risk of derailing this thread too much further with list chat I will just say that the Harry Potter books being on that list would honestly be a bit of an improvement over the Hubbard or Rand poo poo and leave it at that. It's obviously a bullshit list anyway that was vote bombed so it doesn't even bear discussion I guess. Damo fucked around with this message at 18:08 on Nov 26, 2014 |
# ¿ Nov 26, 2014 18:05 |