|
I don't think this forces anything. If anything it kind of forces Snyder into keeping it, or else it makes it look like he cares more about t shirt sales than allegations of racism. I mean I know he's incapable of shame and all, but still.
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 15:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 03:41 |
|
|
If they do have to make a change they should just call themselves "Washington" and stick with a generic W logo, that way the fans can just call them what they want.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 15:27
|
|
|
The Fightin' Taliban
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 15:34
|
|
|
The Papal Conspiracy
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 15:35
|
|
|
The DC Supremacy
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 15:35
|
|
|
Nail Rat posted:I think Chief Wahoo should be next. Over my dead body
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 15:54
|
|
|
DupaDupa posted:I mean I'm a fan of the team but they could drop the logo. Just go back to the WW2 logo. They have the best jersey in sports.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 16:32
|
|
|
I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but when was the tipping point that made this an issue after no one really gave a poo poo for 80 years? Did the NCAA's decision on Indian mascots kind of reopen the debate? Does the fact that Snyder is such an rear end in a top hat in general play into it?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 19:03
|
|
|
I think if the will is there, the Redskins will find a way to work around this and protect their brand one way or another. "If the will is there" is the operative phrase though, because there's going to be a point pretty soon where they decide it's not worth the headache anymore.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 23:11
|
|
|
Washington Barbed Wire
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2014 16:48
|
|
|
axeil posted:Essentially, why is the law banning the trademark of slurs constitutionally okay? Because slurs belong to everyone.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2014 04:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 03:41 |
|
|
The Washington Redshirts
|
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2014 05:19
|
|