|
The issue is that any re-registration would get stuck waiting for approval, which it probably would not get, and then any appeals of that denial would probably take place with it still being unregistered.
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 16:32
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 10:12 |
|
|
Herpes. posted:Yeah, but given that there obviously wasn't a crippling knockoff deluge between the 1992 cancellation and the 1999 appeal victory, can't Snyder just get an injunction or whatever it was that happened last time? I assume so yes. I'm just saying that people saying he could just re-register the name if it's officially canceled, or register some other Redskins variant, are probably wrong.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 16:59
|
|
|
Cole posted:If it's not the case then where were people at 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or 77 years ago when the name originated? Nobody gave a poo poo for almost 75 years and only recently has it become an issue. Why? 75 years ago segregation was common and legal. I guess you're also ok with that as well!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2014 17:52
|
|