|
Chiefs and Braves are fine, just ban any idiot wearing fake warpaint and regalia from coming in the stadium. Indians are borderline but that loving logo needs to get the gently caress out. Not sure about Blackhawks.
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 15:52
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 19:07 |
|
|
"Chiefs" was from a fan poll and it is usually attributed to in honoof H. Roe Bartle who was a pretty cool dude. That being said if they decide they want to change the name I don't care even a little bit.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 16:27
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Side note, this was from the '95 pro bowl, when the NFL was trying to kick off a leaguewide mascot change to try and market to kids. They then rolled out these weird new mascot costumes at the pro bowl, where they looked like garbage, and so they were mostly scrapped: Don't know if any of the other ones are still alive but KC Wolf is still around and owns hard.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 19:06
|
|
|
The Redskins brand has very little to do with the word "Redskins". Really, the brand would be better without that word long term. Think about that LIBERALS
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 23:33
|
|
|
Legal goons, what do you think the basis for the appeal will be?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2014 01:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 19:07 |
|
|
Cole posted:That's the justification I was talking about. Do you really think "Blackhawks" is offensive?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2014 14:59
|
|