Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
tithin
Nov 14, 2003


[Grandmaster Tactician]



Jumpingmanjim posted:

Coming soon to a property bubble near you:

:commissar:

As someone who wants to own a home, explain why this is bad for me.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BCR
Jan 23, 2011

Define home and why you want to buy one?

Ragingsheep
Nov 7, 2009

Sir Shion posted:

As someone who wants to own a home, explain why this is bad for me.

It makes housing less affordable since everyone will now use their super for property investment.

tithin
Nov 14, 2003


[Grandmaster Tactician]



BCR posted:

Define home and why you want to buy one?

Kind of a dumb question.

Ragingsheep posted:

It makes housing less affordable since everyone will now use their super for property investment.



The article specified first home buyers. Presumably those with properties are excluded.

Those On My Left
Jun 25, 2010

Sir Shion posted:

The article specified first home buyers. Presumably those with properties are excluded.

What makes you think it will play out differently than how the first home buyer's grant played out?

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/nick-xenophons-idea-to-let-first-home-onwers-access-super-to-buy-a-house-is-misguided-helpfullness-2014-7

Also, note that it says that it has to be paid back into your super in 15 years. So what is that, an additional debt? Something else you've gotta pay back on top of your mortgage? Are you going to be able to afford that?

Zenithe
Feb 25, 2013

Ask not to whom the Anidavatar belongs; it belongs to thee.
What it is proposing is supposed to make housing more affordable.

what it will achieve is higher house prices as real estate agents realise they can now charge the existing amount for property + a portion of everyone's super. Also, young people will now be at even more of a disadvantage in the market, as it will favour those with more super in their accounts.

Ragingsheep
Nov 7, 2009

Sir Shion posted:

The article specified first home buyers. Presumably those with properties are excluded.

Fine, it makes housing less affordable since FHBs will now use their super for their first house.

BCR
Jan 23, 2011

Home; apartment overlooking the cbd near X to have wild cocaine parties, beach house in Newcastle because its the only four bedroom place you can afford, one room crack den above a kebab shop.

Why; somewhere to live, investment property can only go up,up,up!

Bifauxnen
Aug 12, 2010

Curses! Foiled again!


Sir Shion posted:

Kind of a dumb question.

The article specified first home buyers. Presumably those with properties are excluded.

Still though, since housing's been so unaffordable that should still be a lot of first home buyers looking to cash in on it. It could help keep the bubble propped up a little longer through first home buyers that were previously unable to buy in at all. Instead of prices dropping due to the lack of demand, more of us get roped in while prices are high. And at the cost of chipping away at our own super profits...

Those On My Left posted:

Also, note that it says that it has to be paid back into your super in 15 years. So what is that, an additional debt? Something else you've gotta pay back on top of your mortgage? Are you going to be able to afford that?

Oh yeah, that part makes me really nervous. Paid back or else what?

It might be nice if they still leave this option open after a crash, though! Cause at the rate things are going, by the time that ever happens I could have enough saved up to buy the drat house outright.

ewe2
Jul 1, 2009

Pickled Tink posted:

Well, I just got back from my appointment with my JSA. They have decided that they are going to throw me into one of those in-house training courses, and my consultant let me read the course description thing. It was initially presented as a choice, but my consultant said he'd sign me up anyway.

Duration: 5 Days, 6 hours a day 9:30am-3:30pm
Designed for: Streams 2-4
People: 10-12
Cost: $800 per person

This looks spectacularly like they are trying to turn government funding into revenue. A bunch of poo poo about SMART or whatever in the course day by day description on the sheet. Setting goals, meeting them, etc. Almost all the stuff in there is stuff I know that I know already, and the rest looks like vague generalization crap.

My consultant said that I should have goals and know where I am going. I told him I did, that in ten months time I would be going into Crime.

Hey Tink I'm just coming to the end of a two-week version of it. I've had a couple of bites and one interview next week. For me the value of it was the genuine attempt to improve my morale and free clothes and maybe a few tips and tricks to my arsenal. If you get that much you'll be doing well.

Gough Suppressant
Nov 14, 2008
Thanks thread, you reminded me to use myGov to transfer my other super into my first state account.

Mad Katter
Aug 23, 2010

STOP THE BATS
Now it’s ‘Sarah Hanson-Harm’: Spike in detention centre ‘incidents’ when Greens senator visits, report reveals

EXCLUSIVE SIMON BENSON NATIONAL POLITICAL EDITOR THE DAILY TELEGRAPH JULY 30, 2014 11:30PM

AN internal report provided to the Immigration Department has warned that, when Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young turns up at a detention centre, there is a corresponding spike in “incidents” involving asylum seekers.

The operational brief provided by the security company Serco to the Department of Immigration and Border Protection claimed “high profile” visits to detention centres sparked an increase in report-able “incidents” and “adverse behaviour” among detainees.

The report, obtained by The Daily Telegraph, cites lawyers and refugee groups among those considered high profile, and who are believed to prompt spikes in incidents at the centres during and after a visit.

But it singled out Ms Hanson Young, naming her as the “Greens Senator from South Australia”, and citing a visit to Christmas Island in January this year as being a catalyst for serious disturbances among the detainees. The department yesterday refused Ms Hanson-Young entry into Curtin detention centre in Western Australia after she demanded access to the 157 Tamil asylum seekers brought to the mainland after three weeks at sea aboard a Customs vessel.

The Serco report, however, revealed that, during a visit by the Senator to Christmas Island between January 24 to 28 this year, the number of incidents more than doubled to 15 from an average of around six.

An accompanying graph showed the number of incidents peaked at 15 on the second day of her visit. It did not specify the types of incidents but claimed the visits caused “anxiety” and “elevated levels of adverse behaviour”.

It claimed that one ”incident of significance” required crowd control.

Ms Hanson Young yesterday claimed to have flown to Broome from Adelaide and then driven to the Curtin centre before she was told she would be denied entry.

She said she was concerned about the welfare of a number of children in the centre and claimed it was the first time she had been denied access.

“I have been there a number of times. I wanted to speak to the new asylum seekers ­detained there,” she said.

“This is highly suspicious that I have been denied access today. This is a political move by the Immigration Minister. What is he hiding? What doesn’t he want me to see?”

Immigration Minister Scott Morrison’s office said he had sought advice from the department when he became aware of Ms Hanson Young’s request to visit Curtin: “The minister was advised that access would not be appropriate in the interests of the good management and safety of the centre.”

Ms Hanson-Young could not be contacted for comment on the Serco report.

EvilElmo
May 10, 2009

Mad Katter posted:

Now it’s ‘Sarah Hanson-Harm’: Spike in detention centre ‘incidents’ when Greens senator visits, report reveals

EXCLUSIVE SIMON BENSON NATIONAL POLITICAL EDITOR THE DAILY TELEGRAPH JULY 30, 2014 11:30PM

AN internal report provided to the Immigration Department has warned that, when Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young turns up at a detention centre, there is a corresponding spike in “incidents” involving asylum seekers.

The operational brief provided by the security company Serco to the Department of Immigration and Border Protection claimed “high profile” visits to detention centres sparked an increase in report-able “incidents” and “adverse behaviour” among detainees.

The report, obtained by The Daily Telegraph, cites lawyers and refugee groups among those considered high profile, and who are believed to prompt spikes in incidents at the centres during and after a visit.

But it singled out Ms Hanson Young, naming her as the “Greens Senator from South Australia”, and citing a visit to Christmas Island in January this year as being a catalyst for serious disturbances among the detainees. The department yesterday refused Ms Hanson-Young entry into Curtin detention centre in Western Australia after she demanded access to the 157 Tamil asylum seekers brought to the mainland after three weeks at sea aboard a Customs vessel.

The Serco report, however, revealed that, during a visit by the Senator to Christmas Island between January 24 to 28 this year, the number of incidents more than doubled to 15 from an average of around six.

An accompanying graph showed the number of incidents peaked at 15 on the second day of her visit. It did not specify the types of incidents but claimed the visits caused “anxiety” and “elevated levels of adverse behaviour”.

It claimed that one ”incident of significance” required crowd control.

Ms Hanson Young yesterday claimed to have flown to Broome from Adelaide and then driven to the Curtin centre before she was told she would be denied entry.

She said she was concerned about the welfare of a number of children in the centre and claimed it was the first time she had been denied access.

“I have been there a number of times. I wanted to speak to the new asylum seekers ­detained there,” she said.

“This is highly suspicious that I have been denied access today. This is a political move by the Immigration Minister. What is he hiding? What doesn’t he want me to see?”

Immigration Minister Scott Morrison’s office said he had sought advice from the department when he became aware of Ms Hanson Young’s request to visit Curtin: “The minister was advised that access would not be appropriate in the interests of the good management and safety of the centre.”

Ms Hanson-Young could not be contacted for comment on the Serco report.

Listening to her speak makes me want to kill myself as well.

Cartoon
Jun 20, 2008

poop

Mad Katter posted:

Ms Hanson-Young could not be contacted for comment on the Serco report.
This is factually incorrect.

http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/breakfast/hanson-young-denies-her-presence-in-detention-centres/5637132

quote:

Hanson-Young denies her presence in detention centres results in 'incidents'
Listen nowDownload audio
Thursday 31 July 2014 7:43AM
Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young. IMAGE: GREENS SENATOR SARAH HANSON-YOUNG. (TIM LESLIE: ABC NEWS)
The Greens immigration spokeswoman Sarah Hanson-Young has been blocked from visiting 157 Sri Lankan asylum seekers at Curtin Detention Centre, after a report compiled for the Immigration Department warned of a spike in 'incidents' and 'adverse behaviour' whenever the Senator visits facilities to speak with detainees.

Listen to the Audio.

Now imagine that the Allison Carabine attacked Tony Abbott like that in an interview....

Mad Katter
Aug 23, 2010

STOP THE BATS

EvilElmo posted:

Listening to her speak makes me want to kill myself as well.

Shut up.

froglet
Nov 12, 2009

You see, the best way to Stop the Boats is a massive swarm of autonomous armed dogs. Strafing a few boats will stop the rest and save many lives in the long term.

You can't make an Omelet without breaking a few eggs. Vote Greens.

Bifauxnen posted:

Still though, since housing's been so unaffordable that should still be a lot of first home buyers looking to cash in on it. It could help keep the bubble propped up a little longer through first home buyers that were previously unable to buy in at all. Instead of prices dropping due to the lack of demand, more of us get roped in while prices are high. And at the cost of chipping away at our own super profits...


Oh yeah, that part makes me really nervous. Paid back or else what?

It might be nice if they still leave this option open after a crash, though! Cause at the rate things are going, by the time that ever happens I could have enough saved up to buy the drat house outright.

I would also point out that the enterprising first home buyer would start salary sacrificing into super as a method of saving for their first home. This isn't bad as such, just that higher earning FHB's will increasingly avoid paying taxes since salary sacrifices into super are taxed at 15%. Super is already a rort without encouraging the latest generation to get a head start.

CrazyTolradi
Oct 2, 2011

It feels so good to be so bad.....at posting.

Using super to help buy a home won't go through because it only benefits FHB and not the fatcat boomers LNP caters to.

Drugs
Jul 16, 2010

I don't like people who take drugs. Customs agents, for example - Albert Einstein

CrazyTolradi posted:

Using super to help buy a home won't go through because it only benefits FHB and not the fatcat boomers LNP caters to.

It will support the fatcat boomers by inflating the prices of their many houses

aejix
Sep 18, 2007

It's about finding that next group of core players we can win with in the next 6, 8, 10 years. Let's face it, it's hard for 20-, 21-, 22-year-olds to lead an NHL team. Look at the playoffs.

That quote is from fucking 2018. Fuck you Jim
Pillbug
After diving back into reading political news again for the last couple of weeks, now the biggest internal conflict raging within me is whose death to celebrate more when it finally happens?

Rupes? Morrison? Hockey? Abbott? I mean obviously there'll be cake and sailing regattas all round because it'll be a tremendous occasion worth celebrating regardless of which of the aforementioned perishes first, but who am I going to bust out the Grange fruity lexia for? Dead heat between Rupes and Morrison, for mine.

G-Spot Run
Jun 28, 2005
Just think, if they all died at once there'd be loving in the streets.

Drugs
Jul 16, 2010

I don't like people who take drugs. Customs agents, for example - Albert Einstein
Morrison, Murdoch, Abbott, Hockey from most to least evil

Cpt Soban
Jul 23, 2011

Haters Objector posted:

Morrison, Murdoch, Abbott, Hockey from most to least evil

It's most evil -> most idiotic

aejix
Sep 18, 2007

It's about finding that next group of core players we can win with in the next 6, 8, 10 years. Let's face it, it's hard for 20-, 21-, 22-year-olds to lead an NHL team. Look at the playoffs.

That quote is from fucking 2018. Fuck you Jim
Pillbug
After reading that horrendous poo poo about the 3 year old having medication destroyed and then suffering seizures for MONTHS, I can't stop fantasizing about ramming a soldering iron up Morrison's urethra

Senor Tron
May 26, 2006


Pandemic Diagram posted:

I have heard that his father is a big spender at Adelaide casino so yeah.

Yup, I used to work at Adelaide Casino and his dad put a lot of money through tables I was a dealer on.

Gough Suppressant
Nov 14, 2008

EvilElmo posted:

Listening to her speak makes me want to kill myself as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EJcLBGAWKM

cowboy beepboop
Feb 24, 2001

With all this super talk, please recommend me a better fund. BT's performance last FY:

quote:

Performance summary
Personal rate of return: 1.82%

Drugs
Jul 16, 2010

I don't like people who take drugs. Customs agents, for example - Albert Einstein

my stepdads beer posted:

With all this super talk, please recommend me a better fund. BT's performance last FY:

Any of these should be fine http://www.industrysuper.com/choose-a-fund/

Or if you want to save the world: http://www.australianethical.com.au/super

cowboy beepboop
Feb 24, 2001

Thank you.

Endman
May 18, 2010

That is not dead which can eternal lie, And with strange aeons even anime may die


How do you chaps deal with the realisation that there are real people you really know that think unemployment welfare is a waste for "dole bludgers"?

Because I got very angry on facebook at somebody and now I feel dizzy.

adamantium|wang
Sep 14, 2003

Missing you

Quantum Mechanic posted:

I have to post this somewhere or I'll pop; avoiding family conflict by not unleashing a tirade on every single one of my wife's relatives posting pro-Israel hasbara bullshit is actually coming close to killing me.

ewe2
Jul 1, 2009

Endman posted:

How do you chaps deal with the realisation that there are real people you really know that think unemployment welfare is a waste for "dole bludgers"?

Because I got very angry on facebook at somebody and now I feel dizzy.

I think of the inversion of that opinion, which is that now they are very very scared of being unemployed and will do anything asked of them for less money to avoid it.

Which was the desired response. And which is what I am even angrier about.

And now they think Labor's Dementia Supplement was a bad idea because everyone wants it and they didn't put in a test on providers that should have been there. But instead of fixing it, they're scrapping it.

Scapegoat
Sep 18, 2004
I think a lot of you guys are deluding yourself if your think there is going to be a massive crash in housing prices. A lot of people will not sell their house for a loss even if it makes sense. Interest rates are low and people are paying off their debt. Even when the GFC hit there wasn't a massive crash though a few people who were leveraged to the hilt got taken to the cleaners. If we have a sustained recession maybe but if the dollar corrects itself that's not even on the cards at the moment.

Ragingsheep
Nov 7, 2009

my stepdads beer posted:

With all this super talk, please recommend me a better fund. BT's performance last FY:

Rest wins a whole bunch of awards so have a look too I guess. http://www.rest.com.au/

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008
Probation
Can't post for 5 days!



whereas this is condemned as anti-semitic.

Tokamak
Dec 22, 2004

Scapegoat posted:

I think a lot of you guys are deluding yourself if your think there is going to be a massive crash in housing prices. A lot of people will not sell their house for a loss even if it makes sense. Interest rates are low and people are paying off their debt. Even when the GFC hit there wasn't a massive crash though a few people who were leveraged to the hilt got taken to the cleaners. If we have a sustained recession maybe but if the dollar corrects itself that's not even on the cards at the moment.

Surely prices can only go up, up, up! That's why the government is considering a policy where you can pay for a house with your retirement money. If no one can afford to buy a house and you are looking to sell, the only thing you can do to get offers is to lower the asking price...
Really now

blacksun
Mar 16, 2006
I told Cwapface not to register me with a title that said I am a faggot but he did it anyway because he likes to tell the truth.

Scapegoat posted:

I think a lot of you guys are deluding yourself if your think there is going to be a massive crash in housing prices. A lot of people will not sell their house for a loss even if it makes sense. Interest rates are low and people are paying off their debt. Even when the GFC hit there wasn't a massive crash though a few people who were leveraged to the hilt got taken to the cleaners. If we have a sustained recession maybe but if the dollar corrects itself that's not even on the cards at the moment.

This is the sad truth. Until there is another major global financial crisis, you won't see housing prices decrease.

Endman
May 18, 2010

That is not dead which can eternal lie, And with strange aeons even anime may die


Jumpingmanjim posted:



whereas this is condemned as anti-semitic.

Spoiler: Palestinians are semites too :ssh:

Those On My Left
Jun 25, 2010

Scapegoat posted:

I think a lot of you guys are deluding yourself if your think there is going to be a massive crash in housing prices. A lot of people will not sell their house for a loss even if it makes sense. Interest rates are low and people are paying off their debt. Even when the GFC hit there wasn't a massive crash though a few people who were leveraged to the hilt got taken to the cleaners. If we have a sustained recession maybe but if the dollar corrects itself that's not even on the cards at the moment.

The GFC was very well managed.

It's not a choice between "business as usual" and "massive crash".

Bifauxnen
Aug 12, 2010

Curses! Foiled again!



Pictured: my brain after seeing the previous comic post.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Chadzok
Apr 25, 2002

my stepdads beer posted:

With all this super talk, please recommend me a better fund. BT's performance last FY:

Just a basic note about finance; don't look at the returns so much as the fees you are paying.
One of them you have control over and the other you don't.

I've got a Hostplus account mainly because they have a dirt-cheap index fund, over 30+ years the difference in fees will make a massive difference.

  • Locked thread