|
Man, am I in!
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2014 04:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 17:59 |
|
|
Countblanc posted:You're all going to have big shoes to fill. No, in this thread we're trying to make good games. Probably gonna go a bit more traditional - 4e-as-I'd-like-it. Keep the concept of discrete key worded powers, but change all the little stuff that annoyed the hell out of me.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2014 22:20
|
|
|
I'm not the judge, obviously, but 13A really isn't much like 4e mechanically. Like, I guess it is inasmuch as it has a d20 and attack rolls, but it's a lot closer to 3.5.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2014 13:52
|
|
|
Gonna obviate all this by just making an aggro system 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 7, 2014 03:39
|
|
|
Roll under stats in the D&D standard range is elegant, but unless you change the way you do other checks, it'll feel a little odd to mix roll-under with roll-add-over.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 9, 2014 04:35
|
|
|
Attack rolls, for one, unless you convert those to roll-unders as well (you'd have to rework how attack bonus & defenses work, but it probably wouldn't be too hard).
|
|
#
¿
Jul 9, 2014 17:38
|
|
|
Right - alternately, you can add the defense to your roll (which is mathematically the same as subtracting from the target) if you don't want to include subtraction.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 9, 2014 18:35
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 17:59 |
|
|
wallawallawingwang posted:Is anyone else oscillating between doing a modest rules cleanup and just using 4e as a base for something totally different? Personally, I'm still trying to figure out a comfortable boundary between "4e-based" and not 4e. Like, what makes 4e 4e, if you get my drift.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2014 17:51
|
|