Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Plutonis
Mar 25, 2011

I remember people complaining here about basing a government system on Iran but their stance on trans rights is much more progressive than most Western countries. Maybe there can be a compromise?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Plutonis
Mar 25, 2011

SedanChair posted:

Forced gender reassignment for gay men is progressive?

Are you implying transwomen are gay men forced into transitioning?

Plutonis
Mar 25, 2011

One argument I keep seeing here is that since theocracies like Iran and the Papal State did bad things, Theocracies are inherently bad. Yet secular governments like Pol Pot's, Mao's, Hitler's and Stalin's together killed almost a hundred million people, perhaps much more than those killed by wars of religion, yet no one says a peep about it?

Plutonis
Mar 25, 2011

VitalSigns posted:

All those horrible governments you mentioned were all run by dark-haired men, so obviously we need a ginger dictatorship. Hey it makes about as much sense as boiling it down a huge variety of cultures and government types into "secularism".

The real reason for references to theocracies that did not live up to the grand ideals posters are claiming they will is to get supporters to explain what is different and why this time a theocracy won't warmonger, abuse minorities, or support fascism. Care to try? No one else has bothered.

Hitler persecuted the pacifist Jehovah's witnesses, while Mao, Stalin and Pol Pot were explicitly anti-religious, using the state machinery to kill church members and religious people. Stop being dense.

Plutonis
Mar 25, 2011

rudatron posted:

'No one says a peep about it' is categorically false, you've clearly never actually read D&D threads on it. But that argument as presented is dumb. The actual arguments put forward against theocracies are subtler, but you willfully ignore that for the joy of trolling D&D.

Ah dismissing my argument as a troll. What now, ad hominems? Great discourse level here on Debate Disco.

Plutonis
Mar 25, 2011

Negative Entropy posted:

The real deep philosophical question here is how a predisposition for Christianity turns you into a weeaboo.

Goodness of heart and inherent morality.

Plutonis
Mar 25, 2011

Who What Now posted:

Actually if god really was an aspie weaboo it would explain a lot.

She is already you loving retard

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haruhi_Suzumiya

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Plutonis
Mar 25, 2011

The liberals here complain about China occupying Tibet and oppressing its people but Tibet was a Theocracy before it was annexed. Riddle me that.

  • Locked thread