Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
doug fuckey
Jun 7, 2007

hella greenbacks
I think a lot of us have had that revelation, maybe within math itself. I was taught in the tradition of Old Math, or basically the "do this, move this number here, and do this," method. Sometimes realizing why you do something, like "borrowing" during subtraction, makes sense, is really surprising, because math was not about the why when I was a kid. This extends a lot further than math too; I recall being really confused by stoichiometry in chemistry, wondering why "you take this element and multiply it by this mole and multiply it by the other mole" or whatever worked, until I realized it's just conversions basically, despite it not being explained as such. If Common Core does make emphasis on averting this, then I'm for it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

doug fuckey
Jun 7, 2007

hella greenbacks

Dirk the Average posted:

Huh, I was taught under the old system and always understood why to do things like that.

You're lucky then. I would guess most students in the past have had no idea why they do particular arrangements, but only that doing them leads to the answer.

  • Locked thread