Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
viewtyjoe
Jan 5, 2009

KillHour posted:

Am I missing something? Why would a child with autism so severe that they are unable to communicate ever be in 7th grade? Or even in a traditional school?

Edit: And your analogy makes no sense.

Because public education is compulsory, poor communication skills don't automatically imply the student can't learn, grades are mostly arbitrary as it is when it comes to special needs, and most districts don't have the population, the money, or the staff to run an alternative school. Even if they did, the metrics the students are being judged against are what was just posted. In an ideal world, the speech therapist, special ed. instructor, or someone with some knowledge of this theoretical autistic student's capabilities would have them on an IEP and the regulations would allow them to set useful goals, instead of expecting all students, regardless of background and ability, to meet arbitrary objectives.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread