|
Can't find a link right now but I do remember reading something about genuine Jackson Pollock paintings being rated higher than art student imitations in blind tests, so there really is something going on there beyond paint splatter.
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2014 16:48 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 10:22 |
|
Ytlaya posted:I think it's possible to simultaneously appreciate stuff like Pollock's art, and to think it's worthwhile, while also not thinking it can really be compared with the art of people who are actually very technically skilled. Like, I could conceivably create some worthwhile music with my cello, but it would be laughable to compare me, as a cellist, with Yo-yo Ma. The same goes for other forms of art. Why not? I think most people understand that the value of music isn't really determined by the technical skill of the player.
|
# ¿ Aug 1, 2014 16:59 |