Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

Peel posted:

This is a group that called itself 'The Dark Enlightenment'. Figure nothing.

I find the contrast of an admittedly well-drawn picture captioned with "urgh loving muslims" pretty loving hilarious myself.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

Darth Walrus posted:

That, at least, is perfectly explicable, forum user Ugly In The Morning.

Seriously, though, this is the internet. A whole lot of folks pick weird, quirky usernames without ever considering the possibility that they might someday become major figures. Hence why one of the more respected journalists covering the Arab Spring and its aftermath is called Brown Moses.

The question relates to names like "dark (x)" or "evil (y)" etc. They all appear to have a common origin, whatever that might be; adolescent attempts to quickly impress upon total strangers?

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

Yeah gonna second needing the details, not because I doubt it but it's always useful to have more proof the Elites of society are human filth

As an aside from the sources above, but almost all evidence is conveniently locked away behind official secret dossiers and threats of libel from the wealthiest, not to mention the global legal protection of the monarchy (and those associated). The aforementioned Jimmy Savile was good friends with all sorts of establishment figures (including former PM Maggie Thatcher), despite being one of the most horrific paedophiles who ever existed.

EDIT: The most recent example of this sort of thing ([Buckingham] Palace [...] deny Prince Andrew underage sex claims)

Chocolate Teapot has a new favorite as of 12:18 on Jan 27, 2015

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

Jack of Hearts posted:

Who was the guy, I think maybe he was a game designer, who laid out his "philosophy" at great length in shameless, incompetent imitation of Nietzsche's writing style? It may not have been mentioned in this thread, but it was amazing.

His real name is Alex K., (can't remember what the K stood for), but his username was usually icycalm and website was something like insomni.ac

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

Cingulate posted:

You're doing the Scott Thing: poo poo-talking something you simply haven't read up on.

I'm not claiming one can "put a single number on all facets of intelligence". But you're doing the Scott Thing.

I've read up on IQ and I've come to the conclusion that it's loving stupid

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

Tiberius Thyben posted:

It's a really stupid, impossible idea build upon a pile of other really stupid, impossible a prioris.

These idiot futurists believe that a technological singularity is fast approaching.
This will bring about an omnibenevolent AI with literally infinite computational power.
This Omnibenevolent AI will solve all problems ever.
However, realizing that it cannot solve problems before it was created, it will want to have been designed as early as possible.
In order to encourage this, these idiots believe, this computer will 'logically' create infinite perfect simulations of anyone who is aware that the above will happen, using it's infinite computational power.
The reason it does this is to torture these simulated people for all eternity if they wouldn't have donated to it's development to the best of their ability (read: donated to Yukowhatever's AI research scam.)
Since you cannot tell if you are one of the simulations, and 'logically' it is far more likely than not that you are one, if you are aware of the coming of such an AI, you are afflicted with 'Roko's Basilisk' and are in danger of eternal suffering unless you donate.
People who are not aware of it, obviously, will not be tortured, because they don't realize they need to donate to avoid torture.

All the logical faults and leaps taken and physical impossibilities are ignored, and any attempt to list them on my part would be absurd because it is incorrect on every level.

Now that you have read this, you are doomed to an eternity in Robot Hell.

That's whatcha whatcha get on level 5 (Jehovah's Witnesses apparently)

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

Curvature of Earth posted:

People who don't have philosophy or English degrees generally interpret "death of the author" to mean that the text means whatever you can contort it into meaning. This is what most people who've heard of death of the author take it to mean. There is no point in quibbling over the academic definition of the term when that's not how the wider populace understands it. Like most of postmodernism, it's been extremely poorly communicated to non-academics and has consequently been taken to mean that words have no meaning beyond what you personally want them to mean.

Death of the author is a good thing because it can essentially rob authoritative figures of their supposed power, and for the reader to call out ugly language or ideologies for what they are trying to hide or obscure.

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009
The dog dick fanfic does not ruin good forms of the concept, just like a few terrible pages on tumblr does not rule the whole site as a worthless element that old people hate on.

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

BobHoward posted:



What does your heart tell you?

It says stop dressing like it's the middle of winter you loving clowns

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

Nessus posted:

Man, Thatcher sure did a grody on the UK's cultural landscape.

There was still an overriding anti-establishment nature to all sorts of stuff right up until everything went about face following the whole 9/11 disaster, at which point everything had to be serious and supportive of government (which itself was a fetid continuation of Thatcher's poo poo). The mid-to-late 90s were really good for things like Cannon Fodder (a really funny and poignant satire of the military at the time), Red Dwarf, and even children's comics like The Beano or Sonic the Comic (written and drawn by 2000AD staff (Judge Dredd)) had subtle anti-establishment factors in them. In sharp contrast to the general bombast of American media (then and now), there was always a very mundane normality to these stories that went by the wayside when everything had to be packaged into neat boxes and made more quaint for "international" audiences.

So basically what I mean is yes, she did.

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

Smudgie Buggler posted:

You're comfortable belittling people and calling them evil when they've actually done nothing to warrant it?

Define "nothing"

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

GIANT OUIJA BOARD posted:

Now post the follow up one about how the guy ranting about nerds is just a spiteful rear end in a top hat. Because that's kind of important too.

The last page is the non-ghost guy angry with the ghost because he smashed his tablet, it's ultimately just storyline stuff; it's irrelevant to the point

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Chocolate Teapot
May 8, 2009

Munin posted:

Talking about transhumanism, AI etc; does anyone have any idea who in the BBC news room it is who has a bee in their bonnet about AI? I've been seeing more and more articles about AI and automation on BBC News recently. It might also be a case of confirmation bias though...

Probably the same execs who saw Second Life as a thing they should pump a bunch of money into back in the day.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply