Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Filboid Studge
Oct 1, 2010
And while they debated the matter among themselves, Conradin made himself another piece of toast.


This has been bubbling in Northern Ireland for a long time. It ties into the fairly well-accepted conspiracy theory of the security services using Northern Ireland as a proxy to fight internal battles.

Major abusers are still on the street, and no-one who orchestrated it was ever held responsible. Colin Wallace is the name you should Google, if you're interested.

I very much doubt that there will ever be a meaningful public investigation.

This is the bit where I suggest that an effort thread about NI would be awesome, and wish that I was in a legal/professional position to do so. Hint hint.

Filboid Studge fucked around with this message at 00:57 on Aug 4, 2014

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rude Dude With Tude
Apr 19, 2007

Your President approves this text.
I've just been emailed an amazing press release which contains vibrant and exciting BORIS JOHNSON NEWS

Bullshit Peddlers Inc. posted:

LEARN TO COOK WITH BORIS

As Mayor of London, Boris Johnson is obviously a very busy man but that doesn’t mean that he doesn’t have time to eat well, as he demonstrates by sharing a recipe in a new charity cookery book available from Clintons.

The London Mayor’s recipe is for an exotic delicacy which Mr Johnson has named “Cheese on Toast” and which consists of melted slices of cheddar cheese on top of toasted bread. In a bold twist to the classic recipe, Boris includes a layer of chutney underneath the cheese.

Boris’ simple to follow recipe is as follows:
  • Cut a large amount of cheese, preferably cheddar, into slabs
  • Lightly toast some brown bread
  • Spread toast with butter and chutney
  • Cover toast with slabs of cheese
  • Grill until it gets all nice and scabby.

What an absolute monster. You put the condiments on after you melt the cheese, you animal.

freebooter
Jul 7, 2009

Hey all, people ask employment law questions all the time in the auspol thread so I'm hoping it's OK here. I started a new job in mid-July, and apparently they pay monthly on the 31st, and if you start after the 9th you don't get paid until the end of the following month. So effectively they expect me to survive 7 weeks without pay in one of the most expensive cities in the world. How is that even legal? This is a full-time job so it's not like I can just go do bar work to make ends meet in the meantime.

Microplastics
Jul 6, 2007

:discourse:
It's what's for dinner.
As I understand it that's quite common but the 9th seems to be a bit early... they must have a poo poo Payroll department.

If your company is a good'un they might give you an advance lump payment which can be deducted from your next paycheque - call their payroll department and ask nicely. you might need to request a specific amount. Say you won't be able to pay the rent without it.

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad posted:

I've just been emailed an amazing press release which contains vibrant and exciting BORIS JOHNSON NEWS


What an absolute monster. You put the condiments on after you melt the cheese, you animal.

He even wants his cheese toasties to be scabs. Despicable.

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames

freebooter posted:

Hey all, people ask employment law questions all the time in the auspol thread so I'm hoping it's OK here. I started a new job in mid-July, and apparently they pay monthly on the 31st, and if you start after the 9th you don't get paid until the end of the following month. So effectively they expect me to survive 7 weeks without pay in one of the most expensive cities in the world. How is that even legal? This is a full-time job so it's not like I can just go do bar work to make ends meet in the meantime.

Sounds like you need a payday loan.

hexa
Dec 10, 2004

And the day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom

KKKlean Energy posted:

If your company is a good'un they might give you an advance lump payment which can be deducted from your next paycheque - call their payroll department and ask nicely. you might need to request a specific amount. Say you won't be able to pay the rent without it.

I've had to do this before and if your company is any way reasonable, they should be able to front some money for you. With one company it was straight from petty cash and deducted from my wages, another my manager fronted the money and I paid him back over two months.

freebooter
Jul 7, 2009

KKKlean Energy posted:

As I understand it that's quite common but the 9th seems to be a bit early... they must have a poo poo Payroll department.

If your company is a good'un they might give you an advance lump payment which can be deducted from your next paycheque - call their payroll department and ask nicely. you might need to request a specific amount. Say you won't be able to pay the rent without it.

Thanks, I'll give that a try - I already talked to HR but they had no sympathy.

It's not actually a total crisis situation, I can borrow money off my Dad if I have to, but I don't want to because he's back in Australia and it involves various banks taking their international exchange cut. Also, you know, I shouldn't have to. Imagine someone in my position who didn't have anyone to fall back on - I mean, you're not even eligible for benefits, because you are actually working full-time.

Is getting paid monthly a typical thing here? This is my first job in the UK but also my first job that's salary rather than wages. It seems ludicrous to me. It's 2014, it's not like you need to handcuff a briefcase to the bursar's wrist and send him down to the bank on Friday afternoon.

HortonNash
Oct 10, 2012

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad posted:

I've just been emailed an amazing press release which contains vibrant and exciting BORIS JOHNSON NEWS


What an absolute monster. You put the condiments on after you melt the cheese, you animal.

gently caress the condiments, he's using brown bread. Stand him against a wall!

twoot
Oct 29, 2012

David Cameron got booed by the crowd in Glasgow Green last night when he appeared on the closing ceremony bigscreen.

Warms the heart :unsmith:

mfcrocker
Jan 31, 2004



Hot Rope Guy

freebooter posted:

Is getting paid monthly a typical thing here? This is my first job in the UK but also my first job that's salary rather than wages. It seems ludicrous to me. It's 2014, it's not like you need to handcuff a briefcase to the bursar's wrist and send him down to the bank on Friday afternoon.

It's incredibly common and yeah, if you can get an advance from your employer that's usually the best solution.

ReV VAdAUL
Oct 3, 2004

I'm WILD about
WILDMAN

goddamnedtwisto posted:

You're saying having the ability to do one thing is exactly morally equivalent to actually doing another, completely different thing? Without starting the whole mass surveillance thing again, you can surely see that the level of intrusion needed to discover someone is a paedophile is massively more than that involved in even the most fevered imaginings of what the Snowden leaks say?

MI5 kept an eye out for possible turning of elected representatives by watching the groups doing the turning (or, admittedly in Wilson's case, by just making poo poo up). You're suggesting that they treat MPs (and other senior political figures) to the same level of scrutiny that they gave to the KGB in the Cold War and terrorist cells today, because that's the level of scrutiny they would need to discover whether or not they were paedophiles. If you can't see the problems with that I don't really know what to say.

Now there's an argument to be made to use that sort of intrusion against paedophile networks but that has problems that make infiltration of organised crime and terrorist networks (and completely innocent environmentalist groups of course) look like a walk in the park.

If, as you pretend, the only possible way to know if a person is a paedophile is massive amounts of invasive surveillance how did journalists find out about these paedophiles? How do the police solve any crimes if the only way to find out if anyone is comiting a crime is invasive surveillance?

Zombywuf
Mar 29, 2008

Filboid Studge posted:

This has been bubbling in Northern Ireland for a long time. It ties into the fairly well-accepted conspiracy theory of the security services using Northern Ireland as a proxy to fight internal battles.

Major abusers are still on the street, and no-one who orchestrated it was ever held responsible. Colin Wallace is the name you should Google, if you're interested.

I very much doubt that there will ever be a meaningful public investigation.

There will never be an investigation, just the occasional unusual suicide.

Cerv
Sep 14, 2004

This is a silly post with little news value.

freebooter posted:

Is getting paid monthly a typical thing here? This is my first job in the UK but also my first job that's salary rather than wages. It seems ludicrous to me. It's 2014, it's not like you need to handcuff a briefcase to the bursar's wrist and send him down to the bank on Friday afternoon.

on salaried positions yes. you'll never get paid weekly for those.

it'd cost more in bank fees and man hours in payroll to do weekly payments. and the occaisional awkward situation like yours aside no staff really need more frequent payments.

take your new contract & acceptance letter into your bank and they'll likely extend your authorised overdraft facilty. a few pennies in interest will work out a lot cheaper than foreign transfer fees from your Dad's money. and definitely don't get a payday loan.

if this is your first job here didn't they offer you a lump sum for relocation expenses? or is that coming with your pay 2 months late?

hookerbot 5000
Dec 21, 2009

freebooter posted:


Is getting paid monthly a typical thing here? This is my first job in the UK but also my first job that's salary rather than wages. It seems ludicrous to me. It's 2014, it's not like you need to handcuff a briefcase to the bursar's wrist and send him down to the bank on Friday afternoon.

Monthly is probably the most common but there's a lot of variation. My sister gets paid four weekly, my son gets paid on the last Friday of the month (so sometimes it's four weeks and other times it's five), my mum gets paid monthly and my husband gets paid weekly.

Out of them all my husband is the highest paid with the 'best' job (and is salaried) but he works for a friend who owns the business so that's probably why it's weekly rather than monthly.

KayTee
May 5, 2012

Whachoodoin?

hookerbot 5000 posted:

Monthly is probably the most common but there's a lot of variation. My sister gets paid four weekly, my son gets paid on the last Friday of the month (so sometimes it's four weeks and other times it's five), my mum gets paid monthly and my husband gets paid weekly.

In my current job, I get paid on the 15th of each month, two weeds in advance, two weeks in lieu. I've had it explained how it works, but I can never get my head around it.

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

ReV VAdAUL posted:

If, as you pretend, the only possible way to know if a person is a paedophile is massive amounts of invasive surveillance how did journalists find out about these paedophiles? How do the police solve any crimes if the only way to find out if anyone is comiting a crime is invasive surveillance?

The only possible was the security services could know if someone is a paedophile is by massive intrusion. Obviously the way that such stories that have come out so far has been from people reporting things to the authorities or to journalists. However if that worked reliably as a mechanism we wouldn't need the security services to investigate, would we? The Police would have already done their job and the person would be in prison. If a victim has been ignored (or even, as has been alleged, actively intimdated) by the Police after reporting their abuse, how likely do you think they'd be to then walk into MI5 to make a report?

Let's play a game. You've just been put in charge of the new Section P at Thames House, responsible for discovering whether or not there are active paedophiles in Government. As it's your first day we'll let you have an easy one - how would you find out, given the powers available to the security services, whether Mark Field MP is a paedophile? If you say something like "I'd check the files" you have to explain what information is in those files and how that information was gathered.

(Note to any lawyers reading - Mark Field MP is not a paedophile, my only reason for using him as an example is that he's MP for the constituency that includes Thames House, to at least cut down travelling expenses for the new Section P)

Plasmafountain
Jun 17, 2008

KayTee posted:

In my current job, I get paid on the 15th of each month, two weeds in advance, two weeks in lieu. I've had it explained how it works, but I can never get my head around it.

:2bong:

hookerbot 5000
Dec 21, 2009

KayTee posted:

In my current job, I get paid on the 15th of each month, two weeds in advance, two weeks in lieu. I've had it explained how it works, but I can never get my head around it.

That's how I was paid in my first 'proper' job, it was pretty good the first month as it meant I got paid for two weeks I hadn't worked yet.

If I had to choose the best monthly is probably the easiest because pretty much all bills and direct debits are set to be paid monthly. If you get paid on the first, set all your direct debits to come out on the 4th then all the money left is disposable and if you decide to spend three quarters of it on a new tattoo at least nothing is going to bounce. Weekly pay means putting a portion of it aside every week which can be hard for people who like spending money (my sister would fail horribly at that and just constantly be in debt to me or my mum or worse).

HortonNash
Oct 10, 2012

goddamnedtwisto posted:

Let's play a game. You've just been put in charge of the new Section P at Thames House, responsible for discovering whether or not there are active paedophiles in Government. As it's your first day we'll let you have an easy one - how would you find out, given the powers available to the security services, whether Mark Field MP is a paedophile? If you say something like "I'd check the files" you have to explain what information is in those files and how that information was gathered.

(Note to any lawyers reading - Mark Field MP is not a paedophile, my only reason for using him as an example is that he's MP for the constituency that includes Thames House, to at least cut down travelling expenses for the new Section P)

"Hello, Theresa we need a warrant to surveil Mark Field MP. Can we have one?"
"Why? We think he might be a paedo."
"No, we don't currently have any evidence that he's a paedo."
"We want to tap his phones and computers, search and bug his residences, vehicles and offices, and follow him."
"Oh, okay, jeeze I was only asking"
"She didn't even say bye, how rude!"

"Hello, Section P, Nash speaking."
"The ADG wants to see me right now?"
"Bugger!"

HortonNash fucked around with this message at 13:17 on Aug 4, 2014

KayTee
May 5, 2012

Whachoodoin?

:aaa: So thats why I find it so confusing.

kim jong-illin
May 2, 2011

HortonNash posted:

gently caress the condiments, he's using brown bread. Stand him against a wall!

White supermarket bread is a good way to shorten your life.

Homemade wholegrain bread is the best.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Pissflaps posted:

Sounds like you need a payday loan.
Nah, he should have chosen richer parents. If Daddy can't provide a pied-a-terre somewhere off Knightsbridge then what are you even doing in London, prole?

(I agree with "ask for an advance"; I did that when I first moved to London several years back and they were fine with it).

edit: if HR aren't willing to give then tell them you'll have to sleep in the office until your first paycheque arrives. You're right, it's completely unreasonable to expect you to live without pay for nearly 2 months.

freebooter
Jul 7, 2009

Cerv posted:

take your new contract & acceptance letter into your bank and they'll likely extend your authorised overdraft facilty. a few pennies in interest will work out a lot cheaper than foreign transfer fees from your Dad's money. and definitely don't get a payday loan.

if this is your first job here didn't they offer you a lump sum for relocation expenses? or is that coming with your pay 2 months late?

Isn't overdraft for small amounts? Even aside from 4 weeks of living expenses I also just moved into a new place and owe about 1000 pounds in bond and August's rent, so it's going to be a fair bit of money.

I moved here first, then got a job, so no relocation expenses.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...
What kind of job is it, if I can ask? If it's relatively senior or skilled then you actually have some power, because the company has gone to all the effort and expense of hiring you and they aren't going to want you to quit / be unable to work for the sake of fronting you one month's pay.

Olewithmilk
Jun 30, 2006

What?

freebooter posted:

Isn't overdraft for small amounts? Even aside from 4 weeks of living expenses I also just moved into a new place and owe about 1000 pounds in bond and August's rent, so it's going to be a fair bit of money.

I moved here first, then got a job, so no relocation expenses.

It's pretty easy to get an overdraft of ~£1500. Although I guess it depends on the bank, and how long you've had the account. It also sucks because then'll you'll have to work a bit to get out of it.

Zephro
Nov 23, 2000

I suppose I could part with one and still be feared...

Olewithmilk posted:

It's pretty easy to get an overdraft of ~£1500. Although I guess it depends on the bank, and how long you've had the account. It also sucks because then'll you'll have to work a bit to get out of it.
He might also struggle because he's only been in the country for a month or two. But yeah, it's worth a try I guess. Though it will involves charges, and I still think the company should front him the cash if they actually want him to work for them.

Prince John
Jun 20, 2006

Oh, poppycock! Female bandits?

SkySteak posted:

Sorry if this is meant to be in the Scottish Independence thread but what are the likely political repercussions if the referendum fails? I understand the issue of independence will be slain or at best, kicked upstairs for a while, but will it have any after effect on devolution and Scotland's role in the UK, in general?

There are a reasonable amount of extra powers heading Scotland's way after the referendum, even in the case of a no vote. More info here.

quote:


- The ability to raise or lower income tax by 10p in the pound. Any change is applied equally across all tax bands.[3]
- Other minor tax powers: control of stamp duty and landfill tax.
- The ability to borrow money, upto £2.2 billion a year.
- Guaranteed Scottish representation in the BBC and Crown Estate.
- Legislative control over several more issues including limited powers relating to drugs, driving, and guns.

ReV VAdAUL
Oct 3, 2004

I'm WILD about
WILDMAN

goddamnedtwisto posted:

The only possible was the security services could know if someone is a paedophile is by massive intrusion. Obviously the way that such stories that have come out so far has been from people reporting things to the authorities or to journalists. However if that worked reliably as a mechanism we wouldn't need the security services to investigate, would we? The Police would have already done their job and the person would be in prison. If a victim has been ignored (or even, as has been alleged, actively intimdated) by the Police after reporting their abuse, how likely do you think they'd be to then walk into MI5 to make a report?

Let's play a game. You've just been put in charge of the new Section P at Thames House, responsible for discovering whether or not there are active paedophiles in Government. As it's your first day we'll let you have an easy one - how would you find out, given the powers available to the security services, whether Mark Field MP is a paedophile? If you say something like "I'd check the files" you have to explain what information is in those files and how that information was gathered.

(Note to any lawyers reading - Mark Field MP is not a paedophile, my only reason for using him as an example is that he's MP for the constituency that includes Thames House, to at least cut down travelling expenses for the new Section P)

The problem with your argument is that your suppose MI5 came into being the moment before a paedophile is about to become a cabinet minister.

How would MI5 go about being aware someone might be a spy or criminal without just hoping the KGB would do their job for them?

1) Keep their ears to the ground. Politics runs on rumour and innuendo and taking a note of rumours that are passing around, most of which will likely be false, gives a basis for starting to look for patterns. Odd but consistent rumours a group of MPs and bigwigs are covertly meeting in the strangest places at least deserves noting down for further consideration.

2) Develop contacts and informants. Be it a patriotic HoC cleaner who sees stuff because MPs treat them as furniture to an aging politician who doesn't like the upstarts who are usurping them there will be plenty of people who can give potentially useful information. Then there are places where informants can be cultivated, in the Police from officers who haven't been allowed to pursue politically sensitive cases, to journalists with information they can't print to a party whip who is having a crisis of conscience over what they're covering up.

3) Learn from mistakes. It is entirely possible MI5 missed a spy ring in the 50s due to reasons other than collusion or incompetence (well not total incompetence) but once that mistake has been made it is total incompetence if on an organisational level they don't learn from it. There are rumours that a paedophile ring has existed for at least 40 years in Westminster and while it could have been missed initially the longer the more MI5 should have become aware of it and learnt to look for patterns regarding it.

4) Create a database and cross reference all this information, develop leads and persons of interest. The more time passes the more detailed and better cross referenced your information drawn from the three previous sources should become. At this point if someone looks very much like a Commie or a drug lord you investigate them immediately, if you only have strong suspicions and they're low level flag them for a closer look if they climb the greasy poll.

5) Use the full power of GCHQ, covert surveillance teams and breaking and entering on targets that pose a strong and clear danger of being a spy or paedophile if it is necessary, if more subtle powers available to you will suffice then just use those. If a prospective minister looks suspicious in the database maybe try and gather more intelligence on them, especially if it is a sensitive role. If there isn't any reason to suspect them then there is no reason to investigate them. Obviously don't investigate a person just because they look likely to join the Cabinet and you certainly don't put someone to investigate a blameless MP on their first day at MI5.

If MI5 hasn't acquired information, in wholly passive ways, about people who are ascending to the highest rungs of British political power before they get there then MI5 truly are incompetent.

Cerv
Sep 14, 2004

This is a silly post with little news value.

freebooter posted:

Isn't overdraft for small amounts? Even aside from 4 weeks of living expenses I also just moved into a new place and owe about 1000 pounds in bond and August's rent, so it's going to be a fair bit of money.

A few grand isn't at all unusual. Obviously you shouldn't be regularly utilising this facility but it's useful to just in case for these sort of situations.

If HR aren't helping with an advance, ask your new line manager to speak to them. They're more likely to care about forming a good relationship. And like Zephro says they actually want you to not starve.

Also congrats on the cheap flat.

HortonNash
Oct 10, 2012

kim jong-illin posted:

White supermarket bread is a good way to shorten your life.

Homemade wholegrain bread is the best.

Surely it depends on how much you eat? Is moderation in all things (except tobacco) not a sensible and reasonably healthy plan?

kim jong-illin
May 2, 2011

HortonNash posted:

Surely it depends on how much you eat? Is moderation in all things (except tobacco) not a sensible and reasonably healthy plan?

Sure but in the context of cheese on toast (which is what this came from) then you get a lot more fibre and a lot less salt if you ditch the white bread. Add in some pumpkin seeds, use some rye flour as part of your mix and so on then you'll drive up both the taste and the nutritional value of your bread.

Supermarket white sandwich bread is a tasteless salty loaf of garbage.

Rolled Cabbage
Sep 3, 2006

Cerv posted:

A few grand isn't at all unusual. Obviously you shouldn't be regularly utilising this facility but it's useful to just in case for these sort of situations.

If HR aren't helping with an advance, ask your new line manager to speak to them. They're more likely to care about forming a good relationship. And like Zephro says they actually want you to not starve.

Also congrats on the cheap flat.

I am going to be the little gloomy cloud and say they absolutely don't give a poo poo. Unless you work at the kind of firm (bank, law) where it would ~reflect badly~ if you were reduced to nicking stuff to eat stuff, you will be very lucky if you are paid on time and in full regardless of the size of the company. Yeah, it's illegal, but you have to pay your rent and you'll be the one stuck paying off £10 a day of bank fees, not them. Even if you quit, you've still got to find a new job and good luck surviving in the meantime.

It's difficult in London, but that makes it even more important that you build up a good nest egg as soon as possible. I've known previous senior bosses miss mortgage payments because the company paid them a month late, another acquaintance got paid after 3 loving years recently, so it's not as uncommon as you might think, regardless of how high up the pole you are.

Zombywuf
Mar 29, 2008

goddamnedtwisto posted:

Let's play a game. You've just been put in charge of the new Section P at Thames House, responsible for discovering whether or not there are active paedophiles in Government. As it's your first day we'll let you have an easy one - how would you find out, given the powers available to the security services, whether Mark Field MP is a paedophile? If you say something like "I'd check the files" you have to explain what information is in those files and how that information was gathered.

(Note to any lawyers reading - Mark Field MP is not a paedophile, my only reason for using him as an example is that he's MP for the constituency that includes Thames House, to at least cut down travelling expenses for the new Section P)

Why are we interested in $TARGET? Have we received reports that they are an active paedophile? Anything aroused our suspicion at all, or are we running Section P by chucking darts at a seating plan of the Commons? If it's either of the former we have a mandate to investigate, with a targeted investigation. Chances are someone didn't just push a note under our door with a name on it, there's likely locations, times, acquaintances. Basically, police work. The claim about MI5 knowing isn't that they gain omnipotence by dint of tapping all the phone lines leaving the country, it's the numerous claims of people reporting this stuff to various authorities. Any of these reports is grounds for investigation, which is potentially grounds for individual tapping - as opposed to the half a million odd "requests" for communications data made by the police last year alone.

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

Zombywuf posted:

Why are we interested in $TARGET? Have we received reports that they are an active paedophile? Anything aroused our suspicion at all, or are we running Section P by chucking darts at a seating plan of the Commons? If it's either of the former we have a mandate to investigate, with a targeted investigation. Chances are someone didn't just push a note under our door with a name on it, there's likely locations, times, acquaintances. Basically, police work. The claim about MI5 knowing isn't that they gain omnipotence by dint of tapping all the phone lines leaving the country, it's the numerous claims of people reporting this stuff to various authorities. Any of these reports is grounds for investigation, which is potentially grounds for individual tapping - as opposed to the half a million odd "requests" for communications data made by the police last year alone.

For fucks sake, how many times do I have to explain this? Communications data is not the same as tapping a phone. In any way. At all. Comms data is "Who is the owner of this phone number/IP address?" and "Which IP address accessed this mailbox?". It does not, and cannot, give any clues as to the content of the communications.

As to the rest of it (and rev's post) what you've described in both those cases is just police work. We have the Police to do that. By their very definition intelligence services work with completely different (and very much more invasive) methods, and there use should be much more carefully proscribed. Fix the loving Police, don't start getting these sort of methods involved.

(And to think I was the one accused of pulling "Think of the children!" as an excuse for greater powers for the intelligence services...)

Zombywuf
Mar 29, 2008

goddamnedtwisto posted:

For fucks sake, how many times do I have to explain this? Communications data is not the same as tapping a phone. In any way. At all. Comms data is "Who is the owner of this phone number/IP address?" and "Which IP address accessed this mailbox?". It does not, and cannot, give any clues as to the content of the communications.

I'm well aware of this, there were a mere 3000 warrants for tapping issued last year - we have no idea what their scope was. Of course, comms crossing an international boundary don't need a warrant, which is where the mass surveillance comes in. This doesn't change the fact that 500,000 claims for communications data with next to no oversight is troublesome.

quote:

As to the rest of it (and rev's post) what you've described in both those cases is just police work. We have the Police to do that. By their very definition intelligence services work with completely different (and very much more invasive) methods, and there use should be much more carefully proscribed. Fix the loving Police, don't start getting these sort of methods involved.

(And to think I was the one accused of pulling "Think of the children!" as an excuse for greater powers for the intelligence services...)

Most of what the intelligence services do is police work. I'm not arguing for greater powers, I'm arguing that the powers they have are easily sufficient. Not handing the police greater powers to abuse is step one of fixing the police as much as it's step one of fixing the intelligence services.

The thing you seem to be missing is that it seems that the police, ministers and intelligence services were handed child rapists on a silver platter and they dismissed them. They don't need a massive technological panopticon to simply follow through on reports received.

Obliterati
Nov 13, 2012

Pain is inevitable.
Suffering is optional.
Thunderdome is forever.
No amount of technology can compel the police and intelligence gangs to do their actual jobs. That requires oversight.

goddamnedtwisto
Dec 31, 2004

If you ask me about the mole people in the London Underground, I WILL be forced to kill you
Fun Shoe

Zombywuf posted:

I'm well aware of this, there were a mere 3000 warrants for tapping issued last year - we have no idea what their scope was. Of course, comms crossing an international boundary don't need a warrant, which is where the mass surveillance comes in. This doesn't change the fact that 500,000 claims for communications data with next to no oversight is troublesome.

So why did you mention it in the same sentence as phone tapping?

As to no oversight, there's a pretty loving strong regulatory framework with people at all stages in the operation having the power to reject overly-broad and overly-intrusive requests, and IOCCO as well as the parent agencies (Home Office, NIO, FCO, and the Scottish Government) all regularly auditing requests as well. Not to say it can't be improved (the problems with collated data I mentioned in the last thread being one of them) but there is a regulatory framework and it is well-enforced.

500,000 sounds a lot but as I also explained that's 500,000 individual requests. Even a relatively simple investigation - say, an obscene phone call - will quickly rack up 3 or more requests, and a large complex criminal investigation can easily rack up hundreds of requests.

Even if you exclude that confounding factor 500k sounds like a big number but it's less than 1% of the population of the UK. That's probably less people than got parking tickets last year, each of which required a similar (if not greater) level of personal data being given out to a RIPA s.22 request (except this time an awful lot of it is to private companies), and yet nobody is claiming this is evidence of 1984+30.

Zombywuf posted:

Most of what the intelligence services do is police work. I'm not arguing for greater powers, I'm arguing that the powers they have are easily sufficient. Not handing the police greater powers to abuse is step one of fixing the police as much as it's step one of fixing the intelligence services.

The thing you seem to be missing is that it seems that the police, ministers and intelligence services were handed child rapists on a silver platter and they dismissed them. They don't need a massive technological panopticon to simply follow through on reports received.

But like I say the solution here is to fix the problems in the Police (and maybe that's something that MI5 or NCA might be able to get involved in but then how can you know they have clean hands?) and actually get these fucks prosecuted and behind bars, not giving intelligence services free (well more free) rein to say "Hey, we've heard some nasty poo poo about so-and-so, best not make him a minister".

Zombywuf
Mar 29, 2008

goddamnedtwisto posted:

So why did you mention it in the same sentence as phone tapping?

Communications data can be really useful, say seeing if your target phoned a particular guest house. The point being the disparity between what powers the police have, and what powers they appear to have used in following up claims of high ranking rape parties.

quote:

As to no oversight, there's a pretty loving strong regulatory framework with people at all stages in the operation having the power to reject overly-broad and overly-intrusive requests, and IOCCO as well as the parent agencies (Home Office, NIO, FCO, and the Scottish Government) all regularly auditing requests as well. Not to say it can't be improved (the problems with collated data I mentioned in the last thread being one of them) but there is a regulatory framework and it is well-enforced.

That entire framework is pretty much "some bloke looks at it once a year". With an implicit "who won't kick up too much of a fuss if he wants to do it again next year." Normal oversight of police processes involves these things well call courts. The courts are bypassed by the regulatory framework - this is a problem. In the case of communications data it's entirely on the say so of a police officer.

quote:

But like I say the solution here is to fix the problems in the Police (and maybe that's something that MI5 or NCA might be able to get involved in but then how can you know they have clean hands?) and actually get these fucks prosecuted and behind bars, not giving intelligence services free (well more free) rein to say "Hey, we've heard some nasty poo poo about so-and-so, best not make him a minister".

And in my opinion the way you fix this is you have decisions going through established legal frameworks instead of making a bunch of new ones because it's different because it's on a computer.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

LemonDrizzle
Mar 28, 2012

neoliberal shithead

Rolled Cabbage posted:

I am going to be the little gloomy cloud and say they absolutely don't give a poo poo. Unless you work at the kind of firm (bank, law) where it would ~reflect badly~ if you were reduced to nicking stuff to eat stuff, you will be very lucky if you are paid on time and in full regardless of the size of the company. Yeah, it's illegal, but you have to pay your rent and you'll be the one stuck paying off £10 a day of bank fees, not them. Even if you quit, you've still got to find a new job and good luck surviving in the meantime.

It's difficult in London, but that makes it even more important that you build up a good nest egg as soon as possible. I've known previous senior bosses miss mortgage payments because the company paid them a month late, another acquaintance got paid after 3 loving years recently, so it's not as uncommon as you might think, regardless of how high up the pole you are.
Why on earth would you stick around with an employer who regularly missed payroll, much less for three (!) years?

  • Locked thread