|
Reverend Catharsis posted:I think that's because her thoughts on Christianity basically amount to "make them suffer and die because they're filthy and worthless altruists who should all suck off a shotgun." Or thereabouts. That's more or less her thoughts on anyone/thing that doesn't fall within the rather narrow bounds of "admirable
|
#
¿
Aug 11, 2014 21:17
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 10:07 |
|
|
Grand Theft Autobot posted:How is Libertopia not a videogame yet? Or is it Minecraft? It hasn't been that long since Bioshock came out, man.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 11, 2014 23:56
|
|
|
Capfalcon posted:I agree. I'm actually more interested in how he manages to justify DRO stuff. I mean, he can just deny the existence of medical statistics he doesn't agree with, but I'm genially curious how the gently caress every DRO proposal isn't straight out of 1984. You must be new to Jrod threads. He's notorious for not addressing, well, anything that seriously challenges his feverish delusions. At most you'll get a one-two line handwave about how it either doesn't matter or never would happen in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2014 02:45
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:J-Rod please define "force" thanks. "Anything I don't like."
|
|
#
¿
Aug 14, 2014 21:54
|
|
|
Somfin posted:We scared him off too completely. He ain't comin' back. Normally this sort of hit to his reputation would ruin him, but due to State interference in the marketplace (ie: bannings) he's got an unnatural monopoly on libertarian shitposting these days. Slightly more seriously, I'd not write him off yet. In all previous iterations of this very thread (of which he's posted several over the years), he gets progressively inconsistent in his replies as the evidence of his own shitheadedness piles up, but rarely stops posting altogether until a mod finally steps on him.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 14, 2014 22:08
|
|
|
Aw man, all that and nothing from Jrod, just some lightweight spouting the usual drivel. Time was lolbs could be counted on to at least post walls of text defending their terrible ideas.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 15, 2014 16:54
|
|
|
Travic posted:As I said I'm not terribly well read. Who is this gentleman? He sounds positively delightful. "I'd rather be crippled for life and unable to walk than pay a dime in taxes." He's Murray "We will never be truly free until there is a thriving market in children" Rothbard. panascope posted:What prompted the switch on this forum from the posters being mostly unabashed libertarians to being mostly socialist? I'm aware that it's a thing that happened but I never knew why or what the instigating events were. For one thing, the insufferable smugness of the puppytar brigade threatened to collapse in on itself at about the same time Ron Paul was becoming a thing, and when LF came along they could not resist that siren's song and most ended up in there to defend the good doctor, where they got more or less got destroyed/run off/banned.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 15, 2014 17:05
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:It's really convenient rhetorically though, because the state exists and pervades every aspect of our lives so you can blame anything and everything on the state. 'State' is to libertarians as 'Obama' is to teabaggers. Hell, there's more than a little bleed-over between the two groups as it is. Why no, I'm not just looking for any excuse to repost this LF-era classic: Goatstein posted:King Hussein Obama I, flanked by his bodyguards, stepped out of his blinged Limoscalade and marched up the gold-lined marble steps of Washington Palace. It should have been a glorious day, yet under his heavy yet exquisite crown of carved human fetus-ivory his brow was ridged deeply as he silently brooded. Still, his posse, boomboxes on their shoulders, dance-walked up the steps, chains and gats jangling over the din as they grabbed their crotches. Context for those not about : Kylejack was, at the time, one of the libertarian-Paulshevik stalwarts, though I believe he's since become more reasonable.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 15, 2014 17:33
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 10:07 |
|
|
Who What Now posted:Many D&D nerds have devoted absurd amounts of time to that exact thing, though. Oh lord, FATAL. That's the one with the "roll-for-anal-circumference" table, right?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 19, 2014 21:22
|
|