|
quote:Sec. 36.03. COERCION OF PUBLIC SERVANT OR VOTER. Just going by a literal reading, I don't see how he violated the is law. Which "specific exercise" of official power was Perry trying to influence? Or which "specific performance" of official duty was Perry trying to influence? Resigning is is not an official duty. The power to resign is not an official power. Resigning is what you do to relieve yourself of official duties. I haven't found a list of duties for DA's in Texas, but I'm pretty sure "the duty to resign" or "the duty to not resign" isn't on it. Those would be incoherent as duties.
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2014 17:35 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 05:16 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:The official duty he was trying to influence was the investigation of his dealings. Ah, but he did not threaten to veto funding unless the investigation is dropped. So the threat he explicitly did make was legitimate?
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2014 18:15 |