Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
VideoTapir
Oct 18, 2005

He'll tire eventually.
Read "The Fourth Part of the World" re: globes and flat earths.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Fourth-Part-World-America/dp/B003NHR618

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




Prester John posted:

I could go on and on with this idea. I feel it explains for example Bitcoiners bizarre expectations of riches. (They are priests of the Free Market and as such will be rewarded in the end) After all what is Atlas shrugged if not just a wordy version of Objectivist Jesus rapturing his people away in the last days as God(The Free Market) pours out his judgement on the rest of the world?

I think some very similar things but I use different language. The growing problem for me is that the language I use (and to large extent think in) is the language they use to hurt people like you.

Venusian Weasel
Nov 18, 2011

VideoTapir posted:

Read "The Fourth Part of the World" re: globes and flat earths.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Fourth-Part-World-America/dp/B003NHR618

I'd also recommend Gould's "Late Birth of a Flat Earth" for a short, straightforward summary of how the flat earth myth got going.

Numerical Anxiety
Sep 2, 2011

Hello.

Bel_Canto posted:

Yeah basically this. Everyone zeroed in on Lactantius (3rd/4th century C.E.) as an example of the errors of the ancients in thinking that the earth was flat, but he was a major outlier: pretty much no educated person had thought the earth was flat since around the 3rd century BCE or so.

It's a shame that Cosmas Indicopleustes' Christian Topography didn't catch on. The world is quite obviously tabernacle shaped, not round or flat. I recommend the text highly, it's a hoot if you're bored and feel like laughing at someone who is not very educated and very, very insistent on a single point despite many good counterarguments even in his day.

It's just like reading the most of the internet, is what I'm saying. I think.

Molly Millions
Jan 27, 2011

It's not like bullshit, more like poetry.
I went to one of these schools in seventh grade and Jesus Christ was it horrifying.

We lived in a small town in the California desert, and my single mother had no idea what to do about my terrible anxiety. She assumed I was acting out (I was a very good kid, I just couldn't do well in school) and decided that it was the influence of all those bad kids in public school. Christian school would surely straighten me out!

Every parent who signed their kids up for the school had the same idea, and most of them really did have behavior problems. All of the high schoolers (all of them) were violent rejects who were involved in some sort of illicit activity. I was the only kid my age there, everyone else was older or younger. It was such a bizarre and alienating atmosphere and I started to get in trouble because I began questioning what was written in my science books, which were all very big on young Earth creationism--something that wasn't taught in my home. There was no outlet for creativity or intelligence and it was just super stressful in general.

We didn't have corporal punishment for the younger kids (pre 9th grade), but one time the teacher did haul her second-grade daughter out in front of the class and instructed us all to watch as she spanked her over something minor. At the time I was so overwhelmed by how hosed up literally everything was, but that sticks out in my mind as a particularly nutty moment in my childhood.

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


Numerical Anxiety posted:

It's a shame that Cosmas Indicopleustes' Christian Topography didn't catch on. The world is quite obviously tabernacle shaped, not round or flat. I recommend the text highly, it's a hoot if you're bored and feel like laughing at someone who is not very educated and very, very insistent on a single point despite many good counterarguments even in his day.

It's just like reading the most of the internet, is what I'm saying. I think.

sugar free jazz
Mar 5, 2008

Prester John posted:

I have thought a great deal about this, having grown up amongst such types. I have a pet theory I have developed after thinking a great deal on the matter and having read both The Republican Brain and The Authoritarians. I feel that underneath the window dressing there are a great many similarities between Dominionists, Libertarians, and Conspiracy Theorists/Birchers.

I hypothesize that these three groups represent different variations of a common thread of authoritarianism. Although they appear to have dramatic differences, each shares a worlview with a very similar narrative.

  • All three have a God that shares many common characteristics. Dominionists worship a God they feel they are the true acolytes of and thusly deserve positions of authority over the rest of us. By the same token, Libertarians treat the free market as a God that they are the true acolytes of and thusly deserve a position of authority over us.(i.e. Captains of Industry) Birchers call their God either "America" or "Freedom/Liberty", but they too view themselves as the true acolytes of their God and thusly deserve positions of authority over us non-believers.(Often some form of Patriarchy when you drill them on it.)
  • All three view the world as an inherently hostile place that would be utopia if only their God were given free reign to make all decisions.
  • All three have an omnipresent evil villain (Satan/Regulation/Illuminati) that has its own acolytes that hold the world back from its natural state of bliss and opulence.
  • All three agree we are presently in some form of "The Last Days". Whether its the Second Coming, the Collapse of Fiat Currency, or the pending Illuminati Takeover, the world is teetering on the very brink of oblivion as a result of the corruptions of their chosen villain.
  • All three believe themselves somehow "enlightened" to the dangers that the sheep(le) are unable to perceive, and as a result they must struggle mightily on behalf of the survival of the species.

I could go on and on with this idea. I feel it explains for example Bitcoiners bizarre expectations of riches. (They are priests of the Free Market and as such will be rewarded in the end) After all what is Atlas shrugged if not just a wordy version of Objectivist Jesus rapturing his people away in the last days as God(The Free Market) pours out his judgement on the rest of the world?

What I am arguing here in short is that there is perhaps a naturally occuring subset of people with a mindset that embraces this worldview, and the reason they all get along so well, as well as their being so much noted overlap, is because they all believe essentially the same thing. And they all think of themselves as persecuted/unappreciated noble warriors fighting the good fight whom will in the end be rewarded for their struggles somehow.


There's actually theory about this, it's a thing.

People don't just make up their own narratives about the world, they draw on a stock of existent stories to explain their world. These are narrative forms, and archetypal groups of forms are schematic narrative templates. As an example of a schematic narrative template, take a look at Bertrand Russel (who owns). Bertrand Russel showed that Saint Augustine's philosophical interpretation of the bible and Marxism have a really creepily similar narrative structure. They're dichotomous struggles, in which the elect/proletarians are destined to reach paradise/communism, when the Second Coming/Revolution comes. The Church/Communist Party has a crucial role to play in spreading the words of the Messiah/Marx.

^was paraphrased from an article I'm currently reading. Got cites for the poo poo in there if you want em.

A Fancy 400 lbs
Jul 24, 2008

Numerical Anxiety posted:

It's a shame that Cosmas Indicopleustes' Christian Topography didn't catch on. The world is quite obviously tabernacle shaped, not round or flat. I recommend the text highly, it's a hoot if you're bored and feel like laughing at someone who is not very educated and very, very insistent on a single point despite many good counterarguments even in his day.

It's just like reading the most of the internet, is what I'm saying. I think.

Thanks for the heads up. I'm reading it now and it's like a bizarro De Rerum Natura. It owns.

Rogue0071
Dec 8, 2009

Grey Hunter's next target.

sugar free jazz posted:

There's actually theory about this, it's a thing.

People don't just make up their own narratives about the world, they draw on a stock of existent stories to explain their world. These are narrative forms, and archetypal groups of forms are schematic narrative templates. As an example of a schematic narrative template, take a look at Bertrand Russel (who owns). Bertrand Russel showed that Saint Augustine's philosophical interpretation of the bible and Marxism have a really creepily similar narrative structure. They're dichotomous struggles, in which the elect/proletarians are destined to reach paradise/communism, when the Second Coming/Revolution comes. The Church/Communist Party has a crucial role to play in spreading the words of the Messiah/Marx.

^was paraphrased from an article I'm currently reading. Got cites for the poo poo in there if you want em.

Maybe if you ridiculously simply and distort things to make them fit an extremely broad and vague "narrative structure". Marxism is an ideology, not a story, it doesn't have a "narrative". The proletariat is a constantly changing group of people identified by economic and class characteristics, not an essentially arbitrary group that is predetermined and unchanging. Class struggle is not inherently dichotomous, and was not in the past, Marx believed society was reaching a point where due to specific circumstances it would become similar to one. Communism is a hypothetical form of social organization, not a supernatural or heavenly paradise (and revolutions would produce socialist states, something that has happened in history, not communism; communism would theoretically be a further development from socialism). Revolutions are things that have and do actually happen in human history and are organized and carried out by humans, not a hypothetical salvation which would be implemented by divine whim. A Marxist party, in the broadest sense, is just a group of people who agree with Marxism and try to take actions towards building socialist states, and even in a specifically Leninist-organized party there is no concept of infallibility or any authority outside of the collective knowledge of party members. Marx is not even remotely a Messiah analogue to Marxists; he was a man who came up with some theories that Marxists broadly accept to some degree and have subsequently built off and around. Almost all Marxists have significant disagreements with Marx about some parts of his economic analysis, historical works, methods of party organization, etc., and most Marxists don't spend a ton of time doing anything involving him specifically and other figures, particularly Luxemburg, Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Mao, and a few others are more influential on (subsets of) modern Marxism than Marx or Engels.

To return to a slightly more on topic discussion, these schools sound completely insane and I had never heard about them before this thread. Has there been any sort of major pushback against them anywhere or have they just flown completely under the radar for anyone except people who largely agree with them?

Rogue0071 fucked around with this message at 06:50 on Sep 6, 2014

GROVER CURES HOUSE
Aug 26, 2007

Go on...

Rogue0071 posted:

Maybe if you ridiculously simply and distort things to make them fit an extremely broad and vague "narrative structure".

But it does somewhat resemble communist propaganda after the Red October. There were definite evangelical overtones, inquisitions to root out heretics, etc. I don't think he was talking about Marxism in general, to be honest.

sugar free jazz
Mar 5, 2008


I was making a friendly point and telling a cute story in support of a thing he said. gently caress off.

If you want to discuss the merits of theory on history and collective memory and how Mao is more influential on Marxism than Marx I'd be happy to but this isn't the thread for it, you weirdly hostile person.

/\/\/\/\/\I was paraphrasing a funny thing Bertrand Russel wrote in 1973 not writing a takedown of Marxism or whatever.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene
At the very least, Marxism has a pretty strong Millenialist vibe to it. Couple that with a history of cults of personality, some basic dialectics and, yeah, Bertrand's point is pretty solid.

GROVER CURES HOUSE
Aug 26, 2007

Go on...

Shbobdb posted:

At the very least, Marxism has a pretty strong Millenialist vibe to it. Couple that with a history of cults of personality, some basic dialectics and, yeah, Bertrand's point is pretty solid.

Millenialist in the same sense as a guy predicting (and writing a loving brick about) the abolition of absolute monarchy or the collapse of the British Empire is a Millenialist.

Rogue0071
Dec 8, 2009

Grey Hunter's next target.

sugar free jazz posted:

I was making a friendly point and telling a cute story in support of a thing he said. gently caress off.

If you want to discuss the merits of theory on history and collective memory and how Mao is more influential on Marxism than Marx I'd be happy to but this isn't the thread for it, you weirdly hostile person.

/\/\/\/\/\I was paraphrasing a funny thing Bertrand Russel wrote in 1973 not writing a takedown of Marxism or whatever.

Sorry, I have had a bad week and apparently read a lot more into that post than was there.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



GROVER CURES HOUSE posted:

Millenialist in the same sense as a guy predicting (and writing a loving brick about) the abolition of absolute monarchy or the collapse of the British Empire is a Millenialist.
I assume we are speaking of lay Marxism, so to speak, rather than advanced theory.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene
The Millenialist vibe is particularly present in early American Marxism. One of Debs' big problems was that he (and his followers) felt that the advance of Marxism was inevitable. Because it was inevitable, it's more of a waiting game. Not that they didn't try to advance their cause but not with the fervor that, for example, contemporary Continental Marxists did.

sugar free jazz
Mar 5, 2008

Rogue0071 posted:

Sorry, I have had a bad week and apparently read a lot more into that post than was there.

Yo I appreciate the apology and we've all been there. Gotta be a healthier way to channel that though.

Peanut3141
Oct 30, 2009

Barlow posted:

I find it hard to believe that someone who graduated an A.C.E program could succeed even at the upper levels of evangelical education. A college like Wheaton, Patrick Henry or even Liberty do have at least some standards.

Never discount the ability of a human being to survive and overcome. Prester John is a good example of this.

I attended a series of A.C.E. schools from K-12. While they weren't run by sociopaths to the degree that the OP experienced, they absolutely teach by rote, punish deviation and questioning and do nothing to teach you how to learn. Very similar to the recent kerfuffle in Ohio (I think) about just teaching scientific facts, instead of scientific thinking. Despite this terrible start, I ran into some excellent teachers at community college that taught me how to actually learn and think for myself. Eventually I graduated from ASU with a BS in Math and very gainfully employed. On the other hand, none of my classmates (out of the dozen or so I still hear about) are doing as well, so I definitely got very very lucky.

In short, it's possible to succeed after a terrible start like this, but you have to get lucky and help from some great professors willing to pick up the slack. Not everybody is so lucky.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




Apocalyptic reasoning is a response to oppression and poverty. I though that was pretty widely known. I guess it isn't. Basically when things are bad for a group the response is often stories that say: someday this bullshit will end. Something like the book of Revelations is "Someday this Roman bullshit will end".
If Marxism goes: "Someday this capitalism bullshit will end", what it's engaging in is apocalyptic reasoning.

That (doing apocalyptic reasoning) is not necessarily a bad thing, it depends on how it's interpreted.

Rogue0071 posted:

Marxism is an ideology, not a story, it doesn't have a "narrative".

Myths are the symbol language we use to interpret meaning. Talking about a historical process active in the world, that is the center of the world, with beginning middle and end states, is myth talk. Going on to talking about if that is reality or literally true or scientific is is discussing if the myth is a "broken" or "unbroken" myth.

You're making the same error as the fundamentalists. That error looks like this: My beliefs are historical, scientific, and certain and thus they are not myths. Edit: "Conscious literalism" is the word for it.

Bar Ran Dun fucked around with this message at 16:16 on Sep 9, 2014

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

BrandorKP posted:

Apocalyptic reasoning is a response to oppression and poverty. I though that was pretty widely known. I guess it isn't. Basically when things are bad for a group the response is often stories that say: someday this bullshit will end. Something like the book of Revelations is "Someday this Roman bullshit will end".
If Marxism goes: "Someday this capitalism bullshit will end", what it's engaging in is apocalyptic reasoning.

That (doing apocalyptic reasoning) is not necessarily a bad thing, it depends on how it's interpreted.


Myths are the symbol language we use to interpret meaning. Talking about a historical process active in the world, that is the center of the world, with beginning middle and end states, is myth talk. Going on to talking about if that is reality or literally true or scientific is is discussing if the myth is a "broken" or "unbroken" myth.

You're making the same error as the fundamentalists. That error looks like this: My beliefs are historical, scientific, and certain and thus they are not myths. Edit: "Conscious literalism" is the word for it.

Some things are true, sorry. To say otherwise is just pooping yourself into irrelevance oh yeah never mind.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




SedanChair posted:

Some things are true, sorry. To say otherwise is just pooping yourself into irrelevance oh yeah never mind.

Or,

Some things might be literally false and metaphorically true. Some things might be objectively true but existentially false. A faith might be real and dynamic but the corresponding beliefs might be false.

"One should distinguish two stages of literalism, the natural and the reactive. The natural stage of literalism is that in which the mythical and the literal are indistinguishable. The primitive period of individuals and groups consists in the inability to separate the creations of symbolic imagination from the facts which can be verified through observation and experiment. This stage has a full right of its own and should not be disturbed, either in individuals or in groups, up to the moment when man's questioning mind breaks the natural acceptance of the mythological visions as literal. If, however, this moment has come, two ways are possible. The one is to replace the unbroken by the [53] broken myth. It is the objectively demanded way, although it is impossible for many people who prefer the repression of their questions to the uncertainty which appears with the breaking of the myth. They are forced into the second stage of literalism, the conscious one, which is aware of the questions but represses them, half consciously, half unconsciously. The tool of repression is usually an acknowledged authority with sacred qualities like the Church or the Bible, to which one owes unconditional surrender. This stage is still justifiable, if the questioning power is very weak and can easily be answered. It is unjustifiable if a mature mind is broken in its personal center by political or psychological methods, split in his unity, and hurt in his integrity. The enemy of a critical theology is not natural literalism but conscious literalism with repression of and aggression toward autonomous thought." -Symbols of Faith excerpted from Dynamics of Faith

People in the primitive literal category often get taken advantage of by people in the "consciously literal" category. And consciously literal thought is directly opposed to critical thought and utilizes authoritarianism to suppress it.

Nemesis Of Moles
Jul 25, 2007

Yeah ok, but Marxism isn't a faith. Neither is a lot of things. Not all things fit the definition of myth regardless of how hard you try to make them work that way.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




If it has something to say about what we are and what we ought to be or what history is and what the end of history ought to be then it's a myth.
If you say Marxism isn't a myth then implied is that it doesn't relate what ought to be to what is symbolically. If it is apocalyptic, if it says some variation of "Someday this capitalism bullshit will end", it clearly does that and is a myth.

That's not a big deal. That's just saying that Marxism uses symbols to relate us to reality in a historical narrative.

VVVV Edit: Shhhh, Don't tell anybody but they're the same thing. But that's the problem isn't it.

Bar Ran Dun fucked around with this message at 18:52 on Sep 9, 2014

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

BrandorKP posted:

If it has something to say about what we are and what we ought to be or what history is and what the end of history ought to be then it's a myth.

Climb out of the Joseph Campbell ghetto or wherever you are living, that's called an "ideology."

Kelfeftaf
Sep 9, 2011
One of the more convincing advertisements I've seen for A.C.E.:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9e3AsD-Wo8

taels
Oct 19, 2012

K:CID:X

Prester John posted:

I hope I'm not impugning on the good will the thread has shown me here, but my laptop is really rally gonna die soon. I'm putting up a Gofundme to buy a new computer so I can play World of Warcraft 18 hours a day continue making awesome threads. I have mod permission for this.

Even if this doesn't work, you guys have been awesome, and the catharsis I have experienced as a result of sharing this with this board, and moreso the knowledge that perhaps someone else might be prevented from going through what I went through is far more valuable to me. You guys are awesome!

But still, internet is my main source of recreation and I'll go nuts without it.

Click the link here if your feeling in a generous mood.

I may have some pc parts just collecting dust.
this has been very enlightening, anyone have more stories along the lines / from that rebecca house business. Sensory deprivation is really serious stuff, go look at the leaked ORCON Jose Padilla or Mohammed al-Qahtani files to see what prolonged exposure does to the human psyche.

http://content.time.com/time/2006/log/log.pdf

Warcabbit
Apr 26, 2008

Wedge Regret
M2: Everything is true.
GP: Even false things?
M2: Even false things are true.
GP: How can that be?
M2: I don't know man, I didn't do it.

While banal, it does tend to get to the point of certain uses of philosophical tools in horribly inappropriate locations.

(I had a PC gathering dust. Problem is, it's far too many states away from Prester John and unshippable.)

Prester Jane
Nov 4, 2008

by Hand Knit
I did get hooked up with a rather sweet laptop a Goon who shall rename nameless(un less he wants to be publicly named) was kind enough to ship out to me. So I'm all good there and waiting on pins and needles for it to arrive like it was the night of December 24th and I was a 10 year old boy again.

I also beat my GoFundMe Goal of $500 by $40, which is just a testament to how incredibly generous politigoons are. Now I just need to go splurge all that money on a couple pairs of designer Jeans and vanish to be never heard from again so that the cycle may be complete.

JT Jag
Aug 30, 2009

#1 Jaguars Sunk Cost Fallacy-Haver
This is one hell of a thread, Prester Johm.

One: I'm glad to hear you're doing better now, and
Two: You should write a book or something.

Kelfeftaf
Sep 9, 2011

Prester John posted:

Now I just need to go splurge all that money on a couple pairs of designer Jeans and vanish to be never heard from again so that the cycle may be complete.

Please make your last post a picture of the fancy stuff you bought with goon cash.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe
I believe the correct purchase is 10 pairs of lovely khakis.

Prester Jane
Nov 4, 2008

by Hand Knit

Kelfeftaf posted:

Please make your last post a picture of the fancy stuff you bought with goon cash.

What a great idea. Can do.

DAD LOST MY IPOD
Feb 3, 2012

Fats Dominar is on the case


I had religious education all through high school. Each semester was a mandatory theology class.

My very first class on the first day of second semester freshman year our teacher wrote the terms exegesis and hermeneutics on the board and made sure we all understood what both were, what the difference was, and why they were important.

In sophomore year as part of my religion class I had to volunteer at the local hospital for 10 hours a week (I think).

I am so sorry about what you all went through. I wish more religious schools were like mine :smith:.

Dirk the Average
Feb 7, 2012

"This may have been a mistake."
Prester John, thank you for this thread. It's horrifying and absolutely depressing that you had to wade through this garbage, and I have absolutely no idea how anyone in his or her right mind could possibly rate this as any sort of actual education. It's just the utter antithesis of anything rational or useful in the world, and I don't understand it as anything other than some sick bastard getting his rocks off on having that much power over a group of people.

If/when you do decide to confront your pastor/rear end in a top hat authority figure from school, just remember that he's only a fellow human being (fellow in the biological sense, pond scum in every other), and that he has no power over you any more. I'm sorry to hear that the statute of limitations has apparently expired. Isn't there some extension on that for abuse heaped upon children for precisely the reason that it takes a long time for people to realize that what they went through was abuse/have enough power to do something about it and potentially even longer for action to be taken?

I know this is personal, and something that you probably have discussed with a counselor at some point, so feel free to not answer it, but have you every told your father your side of the story about the physical abuse, and how much it hurt you when he mentioned that condoning the physical punishment was the "best decision" he's ever made with regard to you?

pentyne
Nov 7, 2012

Prester John posted:

I did get hooked up with a rather sweet laptop a Goon who shall rename nameless(un less he wants to be publicly named) was kind enough to ship out to me. So I'm all good there and waiting on pins and needles for it to arrive like it was the night of December 24th and I was a 10 year old boy again.

I also beat my GoFundMe Goal of $500 by $40, which is just a testament to how incredibly generous politigoons are. Now I just need to go splurge all that money on a couple pairs of designer Jeans and vanish to be never heard from again so that the cycle may be complete.

Do you have to spend the money right away so it doesn't affect your benefits? poo poo man buy a 50 lb bag of rice at least.

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment I'm alive, I pray for death!

pentyne posted:

Do you have to spend the money right away so it doesn't affect your benefits? poo poo man buy a 50 lb bag of rice at least.

He's jokingly drawing reference to LF's famous Bro Aziz donation debacle, which remains one of if not the dumbest things I've seen goons do.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene
Much like his namesake, Prester John is just playing a long con. In retrospect, people will suggest that maybe he went to Ethiopia with his money but more than likely he just stole it all.

Armani
Jun 22, 2008

Now it's been 17 summers since I've seen my mother

But every night I see her smile inside my dreams
Superb thread. Cheers.

InequalityGodzilla
May 31, 2012

Kelfeftaf posted:

Please make your last post a picture of the fancy stuff you bought with goon cash.
Better yet, make a few trips to the bank and get it all withdrawn as singles. Then scatter them on the floor of your apartment and roll around in them. It's insanely satisfying in a Scrooge Mcduck kind of way.


Not that I've ever done that, I mean...

Captain_Maclaine posted:

He's jokingly drawing reference to LF's famous Bro Aziz donation debacle, which remains one of if not the dumbest things I've seen goons do.
That was before my time, details?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MeLKoR
Dec 23, 2004

by FactsAreUseless

InequalityGodzilla posted:

That was before my time, details?

- I'm a gay muslim with a trans boyfriend and my lack of proper clothes for job interviews is keeping me homeless. :yosbutt:

- My god! A gay muslim with a trans boyfriend you say? :homebrew:


*taunts goons with pictures of the designer clothes he got with their money*

  • Locked thread