|
Username: Jonny Angel Movie: I Am Legend (2007) Subtext: Endorsement of BDSM sexuality
|
#
¿
Aug 24, 2014 03:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 17:58 |
|
|
Hbomberguy posted:Subtext: the cop and the criminal are the same person Pre-emptive question: must this theme literally mean that two character in the movie, one a cop and one a criminal, are facets of the same person? Or can it be expanded to be about the thin/non-existent line between the two sides of the law?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2014 19:52
|
|
|
Should I watch the first Very Brady movie for context, or
|
|
#
¿
Sep 2, 2014 04:13
|
|
|
My BDSM theme got paired with a movie literally called Pain & Gain, poo poo owns. Here's a freebie for Randall: Michael Bay's prior movie to Pain & Gain, Transformers: Dark of the Moon, literally ends with an endorsement of BDSM sexuality as an alternative to toxic masculinity. Incorporate that or don't.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 2, 2014 04:27
|
|
|
axleblaze posted:The Raid one also seems particularly hard because I don't think there's one whole woman in that movie. There are two. Now, the extent to which they qualify as characters is debatable, since if I recall they have like four lines between them.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 2, 2014 06:32
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 17:58 |
|
|
TrixRabbi posted:I refuse to rewatch I Am Legend so I'm going to be working off of my memory of it from 2007. I hope that is okay. This is a shame because the movie straight up owns - just make sure you're watching it with the correct ending! So as someone who knows jack poo poo about the Brady Bunch, my understanding from a quick Wikipedia search is that I probably don't need to watch any of the original series, but MIGHT want to watch the first movie from '95. My main question here is: to what extent are we allowed / encouraged / discouraged as far as bringing in related films? Or secondary scholarship, I suppose? I feel like Augusto Boal might have something interesting to say about my subtext as it relates to a populist comedy production.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 2, 2014 16:31
|
|