Josef K. Sourdust posted:

Be careful what you wish for.

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

Is it possible to get banned for an avatar I did not buy and did not request? And will I find out within the next 1 hour?

I surrender! I have learnt the error of my ways....

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

Is it possible to coin the idiom "a goonpiling" or "goonwedgie"?

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

I have no one to blame but myself

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

I'm not saying eugenics is the answer but..you know what? gently caress it! Eugenics is the answer and you all know it. I'm just the only one who's god drat brave enough to admit it.

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

Is it possible to coin the idiom "a goonpiling" or "goonwedgie"?

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

First, I am 72 and on so many medications that no woman, man or child could turn me on so I have no monkey in this circus.

But if people are going to act like hysterical housewives over the BFM thing at least get some facts right.

Assuming what has been posted so far is correct and this girl was 14-15 and lived in Iceland:

1. This makes him at worst a hebephile not a pedophile. It is a not insignificant difference as this is a lesser mental aberration. If she was 15 she may, depending on development have passed out of hebephile range and this would be no aberration at all

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebephilia

2. In America, for example, we incorrectly use the word pedophile for a man having sex with a 17 year old girl. Psychologists know that study after study (brain imaging, etc)show that men of all ages find females most attractive around age 16. But we have decided to protect these girls just as we have decided to protect many things by law. So that man with the 17 year old is breaking the law, but is not mentally aberrant.

3. The age of consent in Iceland is, indeed 15. So this BFM person was either legal or one year below legal and either non-aberrant or barely a hebephile.

So, in my opinion, BFM was a jerk back then and may be a jerk now, I don't know. Kicking him out was fine. But those of you acting like he was a baby-raper-murderer and SCT can never be forgiven for even giving him the benefit of the doubt for a few days are being ridiculously over-righteous.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

TetsuoTW posted:

Possible? Yes.
Lame af? Also yes.

Machai posted:

shameful

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

Putin did nothing wrong.

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

I love shopping at Radio Shack.

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

How many faggots does it take to screw in a lightbulb? friend of the family oval office TRANNY, LOL

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

BAN ME

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

I am a sadder and wiser goon. But now I have to wish for 2 more things on this monkeys paw!

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

People can move past it, and heal.

Saint Freak posted:

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

GOTTA STAY FAI posted:

I would but I spent the part of my monthly budget earmarked for "dumb Internet poo poo" last night making it so we don't have to see DoctorWhat's dumb face every time he posts

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

im permabanned poster niggerstomper58. i first started reading fyad when i was about 12. by 14 i got really obsessed with the concept of “irony” and tried to channel it constantly, until my thought process got really bizarre and i would repeat things like “friend of the family balls” and “i love making GBS threads inside friend of the family assholes” in my head for hours, and i would get really paranoid, start seeing things in the corners of my eyes etc, basically prodromal schizophrenia. im now on antipsychotics. i always wondered what the kind of “ironic” style of fyad humor was all about; i think it’s the unconscious leaking in to the conscious, what jungian theory considered to be the cause of schizophrenic and schizotypal syptoms. i would advise all people who “get” fyad to be careful because that likely means you have a predisposition to a mental illness. peace.

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

We have sweet-smelling kids but no major black-owned publishing companies that can reflect their sweet little faces in children’s books.
There are fewer than 30 black-owned banks in the country, according to the Federal Reserve, compared with about 130 such institutions at the turn of the 20th century. You’d think black people would be seeking more community-oriented banks as alternatives to the big Wall Street firms that ripped them off during the Great Recession.

Black-owned businesses are the second largest employer of black people, next to the federal government. But only 7 percent of small businesses are owned by blacks.

Yet, there was a time when blacks had all of this. It was called the Jim Crow Era.

It was pre-civil rights and segregation was the order of the day. Yet, black families thrived, black businesses prospered and black communities bore no resemblance to the urban ghettos of today.

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children. 1488

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

COULD WE PLEASE HAVE LESS ANAL SEX

GOTTA STAY FAI posted:

I would but I spent the part of my monthly budget earmarked for "dumb Internet poo poo" last night making it so we don't have to see DoctorWhat's dumb face every time he posts

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

With the advent of precision-guided munitions, the west has forgotten the value of community-based strategix bombing.

There is nothing to negotiate, there is only eliminating the system of jihad which exists and is perpetuated in the ungoverned regions of our world.

If your enemy is motivated by humanitarianism and perceptions of god, your nation must be greater than their god. They must feel the fear of our nation more than they feel the imminent wrath of god.

It's time to recognize that jihadism is a system that is in no way compatible with western civilization, and treat it as such at all its levels. If jihadists are radicalized in the west by foreign nationals, eliminate all foreign nationals who radicalize westerners and ensure that their community cannot use the wrath of god to justify further radicalization. For far too long the world has been assuming humanitarian intentions behind power-crazed radicals. Well, I'm here to tell you, that poo poo needs to end, it needs to have ended a generation ago, and if it doesn't end this generation then there may not be their next.

Radicalization is a lot like sexual predation or cult recruitment. These movements attract two kinds of individuals: humanitarians and the ambitiously craven. Foreign recruitment works by identifying the humanitarians through their expressions of kindness, compassion, and empathy.

It starts with a rocket fired from outside a hospital or across the street from a hotel frequented by foreign journalists in Gaza strip. A foreign attack must be responded to; there is no other answer for representative government held accountable by its people. Conveniently, pre-positioned cameras capture the result of jihadist attacks and cry bloody murder at the response while justifying or ignoring the talking points for why the attack occured. In rubble, bodies are uncovered and symbols of youth, innocence, childhood, potential, whatever resonates with the target audience's self-identity are placed, photographed, and disseminated to the world.

This is stage 1: generate propaganda to attract funds and sympathy. Its easier to say "never kill children" than it is to explain "sometimes children will die as a result of actions which are no fault of their own." Simpler message, less logical leaps required. To identify recruits, foreign jihadists then monitor self-reported exposure to their propaganda's earned media.

You see a girl in Columbine share this:


And you commend her for finally recognizing the hardship of life by those corrupt men in power who only seek to repress your simple and honest way of life. You either do this as someone from the target's region just out of range for travel, or from someone identifying themselves as being a subject of abuse. Sometimes, you do one to develop perceived social capital before introducing the target to the second account perported to be from the region; this motivates sympathizers and unaffiliated individuals to undertake the introductory step for you.

Next, the target is slowly encouraged and rewarded by their new online community, while being groomed to run away from home to somewhere which understands them and they are made to feel they can do more good than in their home environment. You slowly indoctrinate them, incrementally exposing them so that by the time you have them going from normal teenage conspicous consumption to visible and unavoidable rejection of that consumption, its too late for all but the professional de-programmer to intervene.

You probe the target for all they're worth during this process, and uncover two friends with similar humanitarian bent. The target makes the introduction for you and uses their social capital to radicalize by proxy. Then, you consolidate your gains before officials have raised sufficient red-flags and before former friends, family, and community are able to intervene and acquire professional de-programming: You pick a meaningless date at random and make it symbolic to your target by having them suggest coming to assist first-hand with humanitarian aid work over that date.

This is the key part, as the radicalized individual must genuinely believe they're special, have unique skills to offer, and have confidence in the justification for whatever you label your cause to madquarade its jihadist intent. With documents in order, you arrange coordination for objective attainment at the final, or intermediary, stage. You have the target traffic themselves or you have them create and obtain the weapons they intend to use.

By this time, the odds of mission incomplete are greatly reduced, as bureaucracies are reactive and rarely proactive in a sustained and efficient manner. How can they be? Sustained preparation has constant costs without immediate effect, whereas reactive responses cost 10x as much as the course of prevention.

So what options do western nations have while maintaining freedom of the press, freedom of associstion, and self-representative democracy? There are eyes on everything, yet an unfocused eye cannot always see the speck of dust across the planet; there are travel bans and known associations, yet you cannot ban someone who never enters your jurisdiction; there is repression and indiscriminate jailing of dissidents, yet those policies violate the innate right of a population to determine self-representation within the bounds of acceptable and stable political discourse.

So what are options are left when responding to terrorism? You either eliminate targets at an individual level, or you eliminate all targets at a community level. Opponents to this policy will call it monstrous and uncivilized, arguing that it kills children through no fault of their own. Those individuals do not care about lives, they care about a cause. For if they cared about something greater than their petty cause, they'd measure the number of children saved by deaths caused through no faults of their own.

Jihadists: Bomb Them, or Bomb Them All?

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

To be quite frank, Platinum sucks at making games. Vanquish was terrible and Metal Gear Rising: Revengance was so boring it put me to sleep.

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

Be careful what you dream for. Because you just might get it.

Josef K. Sourdust posted:

Milk
Milk
Lemonade
Around the corner
Fudge is made