|
ma i married a tuna posted:I'm not quite sure why no one is offering anything useful in this thread yet, but this idea seems viable. The notion that solar panels require more energy to produce than they deliver over the course of their lifetime is no longer true, and their purchase cost is no longer prohibitive. Obviously, location is a factor, but you could legislate for that - factor in yearly sun-hours, and environment obstruction. I can't imagine why this would not be cost- and energy effective all over the southwest, for example. Why not have an intelligent energy policy instead of a retarded building code if you want to promote solar? There's plenty of places other than roofs to put panels.
|
# ¿ Sep 17, 2014 21:57 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 16:55 |
|
JawKnee posted:
I met an old engineer who worked as a construction worker on the plant when it was being built. He saw enough corners being cut and general incompetence that he wisely moved himself and his family out of the city as soon as the job was finished.
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2014 04:56 |