Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > Why not require all commercial building to have solar power?
 
  • Locked thread
Rush Limbo
Sep 5, 2005

its with a full house
 Am I right in thinking a lot of the hysteria around the perceived dangers of radiation being based around the whole Radium craze of yesteryear? Radium is pretty loving horrible because your body uses it as it would use calcium, so if you ingest it (which a lot of people did, via crazy radium quackery) it will seriously gently caress you up in the long term. A few scientific studies have come out measuring the health effects of the Liquidators in Chernobyl and they generally found that there was no huge incidence of cancer, and those that did may have been down to better screening techniques rather than the direct effect of the radiation.

* # ¿ Sep 19, 2014 12:47
  • Quote
Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 17, 2024 14:40
  • Quote
  • Locked thread
The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > Why not require all commercial building to have solar power?