|
The Evil Within wants 4 gigabytes of video ram look at this poo poo Recommended PC system specifications: 64-bit Windows 7/Windows 8 i7 with four-plus cores 4 GB RAM 50 GB of hard drive space (50 GB needed for install, but game will actually only take up around 41 GB of hard drive space, Bethesda says) GeForce GTX 670 or equivalent with 4 GB of VRAM High-speed internet connection Steam account how does that even happen? oh yeah just have like a gtx 670 or something no biggie but it's gotta have 4 gigs of vram lol "You may be able to run The Evil Within if your computer has specs below what's recommended, but in that case, Bethesda says that it "cannot guarantee optimal performance." In any case, you should plan to have 4 GB of VRAM, Bethesda added." confirmed for unoptimized pos
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 01:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 14:36 |
|
|
recommended specs are always bullshit anyways
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 01:48
|
|
|
the games on the xbox 360 so i doubt any amount of unoptimization would gently caress you over that much
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 01:49
|
|
|
i feel super old whenever i see a game's install footprint and its in the tens of gigs
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 01:51
|
|
|
on what planet does a game only need 4 gigs of ram and a "gtx 670 or equivalent" but anbsolutely needs 4 gigs of vram i have a gtx 780 with 3 gigs of vram which no game to date has needed to max out on, how does that even happen where you need such unbalanced specs to run your game smoothly? i'm hella bamboozled, but i guess you can chalk it up to japanese devs + bethesda = lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 01:52
|
|
|
Remember when Diablo wanted 80 megs and that was like holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 01:52
|
|
|
Widestancer posted:Remember when Diablo wanted 80 megs and that was like holy poo poo yyyyep
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 01:54
|
|
|
It's all about the gig's.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:05
|
|
|
rage is like 68 gb
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:08
|
|
|
the graphics inr age kick rear end though.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:08
|
|
|
i remember the bitching about nocturne which was the first 1gb install i think?
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:17
|
|
|
WORST FORUMS GUY posted:i remember the bitching about nocturne which was the first 1gb install i think? isnt that a ps2 game.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:19
|
|
|
That ain't poo poo. What, are you on a compaq?
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:19
|
|
|
Hoodrich posted:isnt that a ps2 game. thats shin megani tensay
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:20
|
|
|
WORST FORUMS GUY posted:thats shin megani tensay oh apparently youre talking about nocturne which came out in 1999 when i was 7 years old
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:22
|
|
|
Hoodrich posted:oh apparently youre talking about nocturne which came out in 1999 when i was 7 years old jesus loving christ im old
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:23
|
|
|
Old ppl in this thread haha.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:43
|
|
|
I can only have like 1 modern game installed at a time on this SSD I bought 3 years ago
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:54
|
|
|
Fargield posted:I can only have like 1 modern game installed at a time on this SSD I bought 3 years ago if somethings like 60g i never install it on the ssd, in my vbiew its only useful for things you use a lot. like if youre only gonna paly Wolfenstein once whats even the point of installing it there
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 02:56
|
|
|
I like my computer to be wicked fast...faster than NASA
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 03:03
|
|
|
01011001 posted:i feel super old whenever i see a game's install footprint and its in the tens of gigs fear is 17 gigs and came out almost a decade ago
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 03:06
|
|
|
lol if you don't have 64 terabytes of vram and a petabyte HDD with a 2tb SSD for games haha loving losers
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 03:17
|
|
|
I don't even have a computer I've been posting from my phone for the last week
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 03:18
|
|
|
Wormskull posted:It's all about the gig's. 
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 04:06
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 04:12
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 04:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 04:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 04:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 04:21
|
|
|
Widestancer posted:Remember when Diablo wanted 80 megs and that was like holy poo poo I remember Falcon 4.0 coming on like 30 floppies.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 04:22
|
|
|
Apparently the PC version is a port of the PS4/XB1 version, which both have unified memory, and a lot of Japanese developers have very little experience with the PC, so they just said gently caress it, throw the whole loving game in vRAM
Monday_ fucked around with this message at 04:36 on Sep 27, 2014 |
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 04:34
|
|
|
Hoodrich posted:the graphics inr age kick rear end though. Rage was ok.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 04:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 10:27
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 10:43
|
|
|
the gig is up
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 11:52
|
|
|
just increase the size of your page file op, if you are on system 6 or earlier you will need connectix ram doubler
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 12:59
|
|
|
memmaker.exe
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 14:05
|
|
|
There are people growing up that think voodoo is some tribal form of dark arts and not the best way to play quake2.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 14:10
|
|
|
Every time I see an install over 10 gigs, I wonder aloud how much of that is cutscenes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 14:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 14:36 |
|
|
unban gigs
|
|
#
?
Sep 27, 2014 17:32
|
|
