|
Mirthless posted:Which is exactly why DUI laws aren't strict enough to begin with, because they operate on an assumption that it's ever okay to drive at any level of intoxication. It would be like writing a gun control legislation that only counts after the third gun you buy, operating on the pure assumption that everyone owns the first two guns and knows how to use the first two guns and plans to use the first two guns the same way. I mean, those assumptions the law makes are awful dumb but what was the point of the law to begin with if it only kicks in when the stockpile starts? If it's illegal to drive while intoxicated, it should just be illegal. Don't put an arbitrary marker in for when you're "just intoxicated enough" to not be able to drive anymore. No tolerance. We must stamp out the scourge of Catholics getting behind the wheel after a sip of communion wine.
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2014 22:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 05:21 |
|
|
Mirthless posted:Drinking is a purely voluntary practice. You can volunteer not to drink if you want to drive. If you're catholic and a cop wants to get on you for .01 on your bac I guess you can take them to court and fight it out on religious grounds? Or we could go off of impairment, since there are other substances that impair your ability to drive rather than putting people away who have barely detectable amounts of alcohol in their blood.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2014 22:16
|
|
|
Death penalty for everything, one strike. It's a choice to break the law, so just don't do it.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 20, 2014 19:09
|
|