|
Eh, we'll be fine. Granted, Bevell wasn't really using him well, but if this is what it takes to get back to the football we used to play without trying to incorporate him then I'm all for it. I assume it's for cap space with production considerations. There any locker room drama going on?
|
# ¿ Oct 18, 2014 01:54 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 07:52 |
|
effectual posted:A conditional 4th is almost nothing. Did we just trade him to prevent a cap hit next year or something? (Aside than the possible off-field reasons) I know we still have it on the books this year. Really? You're ready to call it quits on the team because one prima donna was traded out? Yeah, we've got problems to sort out and work through, but they're nothing we've not been able to surmount before. We're 3-2, not 0-5. The sky isn't falling. wheez the roux posted:it's baffling and stupid and hosed up and bullshit and the only reason given with any weight to it so far is he didn't get along with most of the team or the coaching staff I'd hope that a goddamned adult being paid millions to play a loving game can stow the bullshit and be a bit more mature. I hope you're not implying that Harvin had just cause to be a bitch.
|
# ¿ Oct 18, 2014 09:52 |
|
Harvin isn't what got this team to the superbowl last year. It was defense and Lynch.
|
# ¿ Oct 18, 2014 10:59 |
|
wheez the roux posted:our defensive depth was all traded away in the offseason and lynch's career is in the hands of darrell bevell soo Be positive!
|
# ¿ Oct 18, 2014 13:07 |