|
JJ is cracking down on my bullshit code lines.
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 07:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 07:40 |
|
|
Yeah my eyes started to hurt as well so I wonder how much that had to do with my performance getting worse and worse! I found my best sorting method was by putting them in the place I thought they belonged, then swapping each with the one next to it and seeing if it looked wrong.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 07:04
|
|
|
P.S. I'm going to sleep soon so the first round will run in like 8-9 hours. Fix ur code MMM!
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 07:11
|
|
|
Oh my god.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 07:12
|
|
|
In my defence I asked jj questions, he provided me examples and then I did the same thing that was I. His example and he said it was not allowed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 07:20
|
|
|
Alright. I'll be asleep when the results are posted but I'll see you a few hours after that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 07:24
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:In my defence I asked jj questions, he provided me examples and then I did the same thing that was I. His example and he said it was not allowed. Sorry. Also, let me clear something up here, for ya'll and all future contestants. 9 > 8 > ... > 1 in terms of priority. Like it says in the OP, highest number takes priority.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 17:55
|
|
|
JJ is refusing to take my useless code because he thinks I made mistakes instead of brilliances.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 18:22
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:JJ is refusing to take my useless code because he thinks I made mistakes instead of brilliances. Your mailbox is full, please clean it. Anyway, now we wait on Mills.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 18:23
|
|
|
Mad Rancher posted:Your mailbox is full, please clean it. Emptied.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 18:31
|
|
|
What was the pm you were going to send me jj? I'm dying of suspense
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 19:05
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:What was the pm you were going to send me jj? I'm dying of suspense Just me saying "ok"
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 20:06
|
|
|
Round 1! Turn 1: Mills throws Paper. MMM throws Paper. Tie! Turn 2: Mills throws Paper. MMM throws Scissors. +1 MMM! Turn 3: Mills throws Paper. MMM throws Paper. Tie! Turn 4: Mills throws Paper. MMM throws Scissors. +1 MMM! Turn 5: Mills throws Paper. MMM throws Paper. Tie! Turn 6: Mills throws Paper. MMM throws Scissors. +1 MMM! Turn 7: Mills throws Rock. MMM throws Paper. +1 MMM! Turn 8: Mills throws Rock. MMM throws Rock. Tie! Turn 9: Mills throws Rock. MMM throws Paper. +1 MMM! Turn 10: Mills throws Rock. MMM throws Rock. Tie! End of Round 1: Mills: 0, MMM: 5 Both players may now change a Conditional or Default. Please let me know what you are replacing and with what, or if you are not changing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:09
|
|
|
I have no idea what I'm doing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:22
|
|
|
Mills forfeits. MMM has gained the right to challenge PM!
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:24
|
|
|
I didn't read the OP and didn't realise I could only change one piece of code. Submitted the original planned program for R2 after submitting something junk for R1 and it's invalid. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:25
|
|
|
Huh.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:26
|
|
|
If you'd like we could rematch
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:28
|
|
|
You'd have to delete the PM I just sent you, without reading it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:28
|
|
|
Also I'm not sure JJ would want to.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:29
|
|
|
Mills posted:Also I'm not sure JJ would want to. I don't mind, ya'll can play as many games as you want.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:29
|
|
|
I haven't read the pm and I'm deleting it now, you'll have to send it to me again after we're done though
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:30
|
|
|
OK well I'm down but I just sent MMM a PM telling him all my thoughts so there's not much point if he's read it. I am a big dumb idiot, two times over!
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:30
|
|
|
OK. Thanks MMM. Do you want to keep the 5 point start?
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:31
|
|
|
No, full rematch. You said the round 2 code you had was already written? Use that. Also make sure you don't delete the pm from your sent folder so you can still forward it to me later.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:34
|
|
|
Yeah I had a question or 2 for JJ about how he would execute it but I'll clear that up and get it submitted.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:35
|
|
|
I'll fight both of you at once! With the same code! 
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:48
|
|
|
How about a three way where he resolves PM/Mills, Mills/MMM and MMM/PM at the same time and we're fighting a battle on two fronts?
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:51
|
|
|
Mills posted:How about a three way where he resolves PM/Mills, Mills/MMM and MMM/PM at the same time and we're fighting a battle on two fronts? I can do that, but that would require Mill's code to be valid first.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:52
|
|
|
Jesus Christ. It's Mills' you uneducated swine! Also, my code.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 22:55
|
|
|
I feel like the one on one aspect is important to this game.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 23:04
|
|
|
Also, so Mills' (happy?) confusion doesn't spread to others, only 1 conditional (or the default) activates per round, and as an extension, each conditional must have a way to determine whether rock, paper, or scissors will be thrown. If a conditional does not have that (or, more likely, its way to determine what is thrown isn't capable of being applied yet), that conditional will be skipped over.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 23:05
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:I feel like the one on one aspect is important to this game. If you'd like to submit your code vs PM, and PM would like to submit her code, I can run the game between you two. I can also independently run a game between you and Mills.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 23:06
|
|
|
Triple post! Round 1! Turn 1: PM throws Scissors. MMM throws Paper. +1 PM! Turn 2: PM throws Scissors. MMM throws Scissors. Tie! Turn 3: PM throws Paper. MMM throws Rock. +1 PM! Turn 4: PM throws Rock. MMM throws Paper. +1 MMM! Turn 5: PM throws Scissors. MMM throws Rock. +1 MMM! Turn 6: PM throws Rock. MMM throws Scissors. +1 PM! Turn 7: PM throws Scissor. MMM throws Rock. +1 MMM! Turn 8: PM throws Scissors. MMM throws Scissors. Tie! Turn 9: PM throws Paper. MMM throws Paper. Tie! Turn 10: PM throws Rock. MMM throws Paper. +1 MMM! Round 1 results: PM: 3, MMM: 4 Both players may now change a Conditional or Default. Please let me know what you are replacing and with what, or if you are not changing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 21, 2014 23:58
|
|
|
MMM, I’m arguing with JJ about my code and what’s valid and making sure I understand the rules this time but I’ll make sure I don’t read your game with PM so that I don’t get ideas about what your algo is doing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2014 00:03
|
|
|
Mills posted:MMM, I’m arguing with JJ about my code and what’s valid and making sure I understand the rules this time but I’ll make sure I don’t read your game with PM so that I don’t get ideas about what your algo is doing. I have a different one for PM, but they're similar. Now you probably know why it took my so long though!
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2014 00:09
|
|
|
Round 2! Turn 1: PM throws Paper. MMM throws Rock. +1 PM! Turn 2: PM throws Paper. MMM throws Paper. Tie! Turn 3: PM throws Rock. MMM throws Paper. +1 MMM! Turn 4: PM throws Scissors. MMM throws Rock. +1 MMM! Turn 5: PM throws Paper. MMM throws Scissors. +1 MMM! Turn 6: PM throws Scissors. MMM throws Paper. +1 PM! Turn 7: PM throws Paper. MMM throws Scissors. +1 MMM! Turn 8: PM throws Rock. MMM throws Paper. +1 MMM! Turn 9: PM throws Scissors. MMM throws Rock. +1 MMM! Turn 10: PM throws Paper. MMM throws Scissors. +1 MMM! Round 2 results: PM: 5, MMM: 11 Both players may now change a Conditional or Default. Please let me know what you are replacing and with what, or if you are not changing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2014 00:34
|
|
|
MildManeredManikin posted:I have a different one for PM, but they're similar. Now you probably know why it took my so long though! The ruleset is infuriating me. Like it's a simple program, but there's quirks in the ruleset that require it to be written a certain way. I can't focus on it at work. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2014 00:40
|
|
|
Mills posted:The ruleset is infuriating me. Like it's a simple program, but there's quirks in the ruleset that require it to be written a certain way. I can't focus on it at work. It's like any programming language, you have to get used to the syntax for a bit, work out the little errors. I found good ways of exploiting it though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2014 00:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 07:40 |
|
|
Yeah, the weakness of my program is that it's pretty reliant on everything working together, so there's not much I can do to make drastic changes if I need to.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2014 00:49
|
|