Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Angepain
Jul 13, 2012

what keeps happening to my clothes
I think having a more representational parliament also helps, though obviously this has only been a factor since 1999. There's not so much need for every election to be Labour vs. the Tories, and when it's not possible for the Tories to control absolutely everything with 35% of the vote or so there's a bit less of a need to pander to their voters. We had actual socialists elected at one point, even.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

keep punching joe posted:

general distrust of Tories, which stretches back for centuries.

Not necessarily. Scotland had an awful lot of Conservative/Unionist seats prior to Thatcher. She was the big turning point.

Acaila posted:

I'd be delighted if the Lib Dems lost their hold on the north, they do sod all for their constituencies from all I've seen.

They're sometimes alright at the very local level. My Lib Dem councillors are incredibly nice people and seem to really care about the community based on what they say and write. They're much better than the local Labour/Tory ones who just spend their whole time trying to undermine each other.

Not that I'd ever vote Lib Dem now mind, their national presence is toxic.

keep punching joe
Jan 22, 2006

Die Satan!

ThomasPaine posted:

Not necessarily. Scotland had an awful lot of Conservative/Unionist seats prior to Thatcher. She was the big turning point.

Maybe in recent memory, but doesn't the word Torie itself derive from the Irish/Scots Gaelic for highwayman.

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

keep punching joe posted:

Maybe in recent memory, but doesn't the word Torie itself derive from the Irish/Scots Gaelic for highwayman.

It does, but it looks like it was 'reclaimed' quite early and lost its pejorative meaning. It just came to refer to anyone who was heavily conservative and pro-monarchy, as opposed to Whigs who were seen as more reformist (both terms seem to have come out of the civil war).

So there were plenty of Tories in Scotland, because there were plenty of traditional monarchists (growing into what we'd now see as conservatives). I don't think there's any reason to believe there was a substantial regional division before Thatcher. Even episodes like Red Clydeside tend to be overblown, and based around a few very loud (but brilliant) figures. Regardless, early 20th C Scottish socialism tended to be focused around the industrial cities (so effectively Glasgow, Dundee, and some of the smaller centres in Fife etc.), while the countryside tended to be highly agrarian and backward-looking. You have to remember that most of the rural areas were owned by powerful landowners and aristocrats and that the peasantry had been more or less exported to the cities during the clearances in a lot of cases. They're natually Tory areas because of this.

ThomasPaine fucked around with this message at 13:37 on Nov 2, 2014

baronvonsabre
Aug 1, 2013

ThomasPaine posted:

Not necessarily. Scotland had an awful lot of Conservative/Unionist seats prior to Thatcher. She was the big turning point.

Both true and not true: while the biggest decline of the party was between 1983 and 1987 (losing 11 seats), they actually gained a seat in 1992 and weren't routed in Scotland until 1997. Similarly, the party had been steadily declining since last getting a majority in Scotland in 1955. Thatcher definitely accelerated the demise, but I would argue that the merger of the Unionist party with the Conservatives and loss of a Scottish-specific type of centre-right politics (alongside the increasing strength of the opposition parties) was what did them in.

Acaila
Jan 2, 2011



ThomasPaine posted:

Regardless, early 20th C Scottish socialism tended to be focused around the industrial cities (so effectively Glasgow, Dundee, and some of the smaller centres in Fife etc.), while the countryside tended to be highly agrarian and backward-looking. You have to remember that most of the rural areas were owned by powerful landowners and aristocrats and that the peasantry had been more or less exported to the cities during the clearances in a lot of cases. They're natually Tory areas because of this.

This has a lot of truth as I understand it. That's why even after rejecting the Tories, those areas have gone Lib Dem or SNP, rather than heading for the socialist way. Even in the referendum, there were mutterings of discontent because the wealthy landowners were using all their space to put up huge No banners along main roads (Someone suggested that's why Inverness went so mad for Yes signs - driving up the A9 pissed them all off so much that they had to be very visibly contrary).

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

baronvonsabre posted:

I would argue that the merger of the Unionist party with the Conservatives and loss of a Scottish-specific type of centre-right politics (alongside the increasing strength of the opposition parties) was what did them in.

This could well be true and I hadn't thought of it. Point is, Scotland has just as much right-wing history as it has left.

ReV VAdAUL
Oct 3, 2004

I'm WILD about
WILDMAN
If the SNP splits rather than just gliding to the right then a new, palatable right wing party is all but certain to emerge. Additionally UKIP have shown that with a rebrand that shifts you even further to the right you can pick up large numbers of votes from people who find the Tories to be toxic. If some enterprising members of the Scottish Tory party very publicly broke from it and founded the Scottish Democrats or whatever they'd likely start to do much better.

Acaila
Jan 2, 2011



There were mutterings of that in the last Scottish Tory leadership election but it came to nothing.
Not much to support SNP gliding to the right though. There are claims that Sturgeon will be the most left wing First Minister ever (I'm unconvinced, but if there's a move to the right, it's apparently completely escaping the notice of all commentators), and the tripling of the membership happened in an era of the SNP outflanking SLAB on the left and running an independence campaign chock full of social justice ideals.

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

Acaila posted:

There were mutterings of that in the last Scottish Tory leadership election but it came to nothing.
Not much to support SNP gliding to the right though. There are claims that Sturgeon will be the most left wing First Minister ever (I'm unconvinced, but if there's a move to the right, it's apparently completely escaping the notice of all commentators), and the tripling of the membership happened in an era of the SNP outflanking SLAB on the left and running an independence campaign chock full of social justice ideals.

I'm not an SNP voter by any means but Nicola Sturgeon is solid and in many respects a proper left-winger. I'm very glad she's going to be FM.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


ReV VAdAUL posted:

If the SNP splits rather than just gliding to the right then a new, palatable right wing party is all but certain to emerge. Additionally UKIP have shown that with a rebrand that shifts you even further to the right you can pick up large numbers of votes from people who find the Tories to be toxic. If some enterprising members of the Scottish Tory party very publicly broke from it and founded the Scottish Democrats or whatever they'd likely start to do much better.

That's quite a big if. IF the SNP splits, sure, I could see a right wing option in Scotland. But I don't expect the SNP to split at any point in the near future unless Sturgeon is secretly a Leninist. In which case she's done a very good job hiding that fact until this point.

If Scotland had voted yes then I expected the SNP to go the way of the dodo, but for most sane people that issue has been kicked to the curb for at least a decade if not a generation. And so the SNP will continue to exist as a broad church thats leadership is currently somewhat centre-left & populist in a way that Labour hasn't been for quite some time.

Dreaming about the SNP splintering in the near future is about as worthwhile as the 45 dreaming of another indy referendum tomorrow & this time we'll win it, honest.

Acaila
Jan 2, 2011



ThomasPaine posted:

I'm not an SNP voter by any means but Nicola Sturgeon is solid and in many respects a proper left-winger. I'm very glad she's going to be FM.

Not that I'm slagging her, but in what respects would you say she's a proper left-winger?

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010
It's not looking good for Murphy, nobody's willing to step aside and let him run for MSP.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/polit...campaign=buffer


quote:

Ken Macintosh, Hugh Henry and John Pentland all insisted they would seek re-election at the 2016 Scottish poll, leaving Murphy struggling to find a route into Holyrood.

Murphy, who yesterday launched his campaign to lead Scottish Labour with an admission he didn't know how many members the party had, said he wanted to be an MSP in 2016, "if not before".

An early appearance at Holyrood would help boost his profile as a would-be First Minister, but would also require a by-election.

Since Johann Lamont stood down as leader a week ago, there has been speculation Murphy could become an MSP via a by-election on the same day as the 2015 General Election.

One option would be to exchange seats with his Holyrood counterpart, Ken Macintosh. Under this scenario, Macintosh would stand in Murphy's East Renfrewshire seat for Westminster, while Murphy stood in Macintosh's near-identical Holyrood constituency of Eastwood.

But Macintosh, who is backing Murphy for the leadership, told the Sunday Herald: "I will be seeking re-election in 2016."

Another option would be for Murphy to stand in a by-election caused by an MSP retiring. Hugh Henry in Renfrewshire South and John Pentland in Motherwell and Wishaw are tipped as potential candidates for an early pension.

However, Pentland, who was at Murphy's campaign launch in Edinburgh, said he would not oblige. "I'm certainly fighting Motherwell and Wishaw in 2016," he told the Sunday Herald.

Henry also dismissed a deal with Murphy, saying: "I will be seeking re-election in 2016."

In theory, Murphy could stand for re-election to Westminster next May, then wait until the 2016 election to try and enter Holyrood, but it would be politically impossible.

Having declared his intention to become First Minister, Murphy would be attacked remorselessly by the SNP if he stood again for Westminster.

Macintosh said he would be "amazed" if Murphy stood again for Westminster, and suggested he could either become an MSP via the list system - usually viewed as a cop-out for party leaders - or, more probably, try to retake one of the seats lost to the SNP at the 2011 election.

Asked yesterday if he would stand again for Westminster in 2015, Murphy refused to give a clear answer, saying merely that he would "take one election at a time".

Murphy, the shadow international development secretary and former Scottish secretary, launched his leadership campaign at the Royal College of Surgeons in Edinburgh - a venue previously favoured by the Scottish Tories.

The audience of around 100 activists included many from the pro-Union Better Together campaign, including chairman Alistair Darling.

Also supporting Murphy at the event were MPs Pamela Nash and Gemma Doyle, MSPs Pentland, James Kelly and Hanzala Malik, Glasgow City Council leader Gordon Matheson and Inverclyde Council leader Stephen McCabe.

Former MP Rosemary McKenna, a Murphy ally in the infamous "Network" promoting New Labour candidates in the 1990s, also attended.

Against a backdrop of red Saltires, Murphy said: "I'm here today for one thing and one thing only. I'm here for Scotland. The country I love. The country we all love."

He apologised for Labour's "lack of vision" in recent years, which he said cost the party the 2007 and 2011 elections, and said his tour of Scotland during the referendum had taught him the country wanted change. Labour itself needed to change to deliver it.

He said: "I'm not here to kick the SNP. I want a different type of politics where the Scottish Labour Party doesn't shout at or about the SNP but instead listens and talks to Scotland. One of the most remarkable aspects of the referendum was the passion that it attracted.

"In coming together to put the referendum result behind us we should keep that passion within us and unleash it to solve Scotland's problems. If we do that there's no problem in Scotland that we can't solve together."

It was a speech which underlined Scottish Labour's raison d'etre as tackling poverty and inequality and included a quote from party founder Keir Hardie, but it also included a distinctly Blairite reference to "wealth creation" being part of the plan.

Murphy traced his own political roots to the inequality and injustice he experienced in the Glasgow housing scheme where he slept in a drawer as an infant, and to apartheid-era South Africa where he lived as a teenager after his parents emigrated for work.

He said "none of us should sleep easily in our beds" while so many children from poor families fared badly at school and their parents had greater levels of ill health than the well-off.

He said: "Why and for what are we waiting in Scotland? How many more lives, how much more wasted potential must go by? We have the powers - and we're getting more.

"What we need is the purpose. We have seen how powerful the Scottish Government can be as a driving force for a single-minded agenda under the SNP. It's just that they used that power for one thing only. The drive for independence.

"Just imagine if we took all that energy, and all those powers and harnessed them to the one thing Scotland needs above all else - building a society where what you achieve isn't determined by the family you are born into.

"That's a project, that's a programme, that's a purpose. And it is our historic purpose. We cannot wait any longer.

"The fight for Scotland starts here. I want to get on with it, and I will not rest until we win it." Talking to the media later, Murphy said he would not be "pushed around" as leader and Scottish Labour would take its own decisions on finances, devolved policy, tactics and strategy.

He said he wanted to make Scottish Labour self-financing by broadening its appeal and attracting more donations, but said it would be a "huge challenge" to end its reliance on cash from the UK party. Despite saying he wanted to reform Scottish Labour, he said when asked what the current membership is: "You'd have to ask the Scottish Labour Party that. I don't have that."

Regarding May's General Election, he said: "We will win all of the [40 Scottish] seats we currently have - what we have we will hold.

"I know how we can do that. It's going to take a lot of work. I'm confident we can do it and that will be a great springboard for 2016. If I didn't believe we can win in 2015 and 2016 I wouldn't be standing for leader."

On the question of more ­devolution, he refused to say if, like the other parties in the Smith Commission, he wanted control of 100% of income tax in Holyrood's hands.

He said: "I think it's important that there is more devolution on tax but the detail ... I will set that out during the leadership campaign."

He was keener on devolving powers from central to local government, especially some of the welfare powers coming to Holyrood, such as housing benefit and attendance allowance.

"If we can create a local devolved welfare state not run from London or Edinburgh that has a financial incentive … not motivated by altruism and responsibility, but has an incentive that can save [people] money in their cities and towns if they get people into meaningful long-term work, then that's a good thing."

He suggested councils might operate different rates of benefit, with Jobseeker's Allowance remaining "probably the same … but they can come up with different ways of supporting people". Murphy is the bookies' favourite to win, but is a divisive figure within the party.

A senior Labour insider who has known Murphy for years said he was cold, calculating and driven by ambition, not ideology, and added: "Jim has no politics. He was always part of a New Labour project building up his own career … It's all about him."

Asked how the party would fare if Murphy became leader, a Labour MP added: "We're f***ed.''

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

Acaila posted:

Not that I'm slagging her, but in what respects would you say she's a proper left-winger?

Maybe it's the wrong word. She's clearly very concerned about poverty and doing what she can for those worse off, which should translate into left-wing policies. I'm not saying she's actually a communist or anything, but she's a lot less cynical and careerist than most politicians. I agree that she probably won't rock the boat all that much, but within a broadly orthodox framework I think she'll tack towards the left.

Acaila
Jan 2, 2011



Eh, if she were a proper left-winger I'd be looking for things with a bit more lefty ideological clout behind them. You never hear her or anyone from the SNP talking about class struggle! They've promoted populist policies on things like education and health, but they don't really have a track record of real leftist thought, more trying to win over Labour voters. Though I did note Sturgeon getting published in Scottish Left Review recently.

The last line of that Herald article though. There's truth there, Murphy is not a nice person and he's not the person to get Scotland behind Labour again, let alone the party behind him. If he manages to win the votes, I think Labour as we've all thought of it is officially gone :(.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


The left is slightly broader than angry students bellowing about class war.

Obliterati
Nov 13, 2012

Pain is inevitable.
Suffering is optional.
Thunderdome is forever.

Acaila posted:

Eh, if she were a proper left-winger I'd be looking for things with a bit more lefty ideological clout behind them. You never hear her or anyone from the SNP talking about class struggle! They've promoted populist policies on things like education and health, but they don't really have a track record of real leftist thought, more trying to win over Labour voters. Though I did note Sturgeon getting published in Scottish Left Review recently.

The last line of that Herald article though. There's truth there, Murphy is not a nice person and he's not the person to get Scotland behind Labour again, let alone the party behind him. If he manages to win the votes, I think Labour as we've all thought of it is officially gone :(.

She certainly isn't an 'official' left-winger, but on those fronts of education/health I for one would much rather someone walked the walk rather than talked the talk, if you know what I mean. Any progress is good.

On Murphy I refuse to believe he's going to win. Sure, the papers and BBC are behind him but Findlay's the one getting union support and there's no way Labour can be stupid enough to pick the worst Blairite of the lot, is there?

Acaila
Jan 2, 2011



Call me old fashioned, but I think you need to talk the talk and walk the walk. Otherwise, like the timing of the free prescriptions (which I think is a great policy don't get me wrong), it comes across as populist vote grabbing rather than actual ideological left policies.
The whole idea of her being on the left of the SNP just seems to be this myth created to win over those who still instinctively see the SNP in their pre-Salmond "Tartan Tories" guise. Now myths can have a basis in fact, but I am very much still waiting for any sort of solid evidence of her being more left than any former FM.

Also considering recent discussion on the thread, isn't it interesting that the worst you can call Scottish Labour and the SNP are Red Tories and Tartan Tories? :D

forkboy84 posted:

The left is slightly broader than angry students bellowing about class war.

Since neither I, nor any of my leftie comrades are angry bellowing students, I'm quite aware of that ;)

Breath Ray
Nov 19, 2010

Obliterati posted:

She certainly isn't an 'official' left-winger, but on those fronts of education/health I for one would much rather someone walked the walk rather than talked the talk, if you know what I mean. Any progress is good.

On Murphy I refuse to believe he's going to win. Sure, the papers and BBC are behind him but Findlay's the one getting union support and there's no way Labour can be stupid enough to pick the worst Blairite of the lot, is there?

Otoh Ed Milliband had Union backing and he's not doing terribly well

Obliterati
Nov 13, 2012

Pain is inevitable.
Suffering is optional.
Thunderdome is forever.
It would definitely be fair to adopt a 'wait and see' attitude on that but yes I don't see Sturgeon singing the Internationale any time soon. Anecdotally it seems like a lot of SNP joiners are Labour refugees so if the old guard doesn't want to go left they're going to have something of a problem.

Burqa King posted:

Otoh Ed Milliband had Union backing and he's not doing terribly well

He did win the leadership election though. I don't mean that Findlay would necessarily be a good leader but he must be better than Murphy.

Acaila
Jan 2, 2011



I've actually been shocked at a couple of proper Old Labour activists I know joining the SNP within 48 hours of the referendum. I'm contented that it's not the path for me, and that I belong in a party whose left-wing credentials are clear, but time will tell where that party is. The other reason being, and this is more relevant to Labour refugees, is that the current setup of the SNP gives a huge amount of power to the leader and makes it difficult for ordinary members to effect a lot of change.

The comment about Sturgeon singing the Internationale reminds me of the Sky News debate for the UK Labour leadership election. The final question from the audience of Labour members was a nice old lady who asked the leadership hopefuls "What are the words to the third verse of the Red Flag?". None of them offered an answer, whether through ignorance or not wanting to seem like a leftie. My dear old mum has often said anyone who didn't know the words to that or the Internationale would have been turfed out of their local Labour meetings back in the day!

twoot
Oct 29, 2012

Kezia Dugdale has confirmed she will be running for Labour deputy.

Communist Bear
Oct 7, 2008

Gonzo McFee posted:

It's not looking good for Murphy, nobody's willing to step aside and let him run for MSP.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/polit...campaign=buffer

So....Murphy is the UK-equivalent of Mitt Romney? :haw:

Acaila
Jan 2, 2011



Alistair Darling is standing down as an MP at the general election. No doubt prior to a swift bump upstairs.
Be interested to see who they get to run for it locally - swore I'd never vote for him after the referendum.

Communist Thoughts
Jan 7, 2008

Our war against free speech cannot end until we silence this bronze beast!


Burqa King posted:

SO why does Scotland tend to the left in politics? Is it because they don't have a lot of immigration compared to England do you think?

Man that seems like a stupid reason to jump to. Have you just been reading about immigrants a lot lately or something?

Its a bit of a shame Salmond is gone, since he was a cheery chappy. Leaving when he did was super canny though, I feel like he cemented his position as easily best modern major politician in the UK. With an international politician rating of: adequate and somewhat professional (about seven levels higher than the next best, embarassingly, Farage).

I assume we'll see more swings towards Yes now that it isn't on the table and now that "the big three" have turned out to be making all that vow poo poo up but it really doesn't matter. Britain had a nearly disastrous flirt with democracy and nothing like that is ever gonna happen again.

Acaila
Jan 2, 2011



It's been commented that by resigning so quickly, Salmond forced the media to abort their planned focus on woe and gloom for the SNP and immediately start having to eulogise his great achievements. A nice little kicker. I wonder if he will decide to go for a Westminster seat after all. With the gains the SNP seem likely to make by even conservative estimates, he could get out of Sturgeon's hair and have a whale of a time getting it right up the posh boys of Westminster again.

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames
There's always somebody ready to describe Salmond's latest action, comment or fart as being part of some grand political scheme.

I can't think of another western politician that inspires such sycophancy it's nauseating.

baronvonsabre
Aug 1, 2013

Pissflaps posted:

I can't think of another western politician that inspires such sycophancy it's nauseating.

Do yourself a favour then, don't watch any of the BBC coverage of Jim Murphy's leadership bid.

Acaila
Jan 2, 2011



Pissflaps posted:

There's always somebody ready to describe Salmond's latest action, comment or fart as being part of some grand political scheme.

I can't think of another western politician that inspires such sycophancy it's nauseating.

I don't even like the guy. He is clever and a capable politician and he's done well for Scotland generally and doesn't seem like a horrible person, but I don't *like* him or his politics let alone behave in a sycophantic manner towards him. I don't think having politicians you can vaguely respect is a bad thing, but hey, that's Pissflaps for ya :rolleyes:

Murphy though, yeah. Like, I may not agree with Salmond but he seems to actually do what he thinks is right, whereas Murphy is just a powerhungry slimy eejit.

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames
Don't be so sensitive I was referring to the comments you were describing in your post.

keep punching joe
Jan 22, 2006

Die Satan!
Alex Salmond is a national treasure, we should have an official Alex Salmond day.

Obliterati
Nov 13, 2012

Pain is inevitable.
Suffering is optional.
Thunderdome is forever.

keep punching joe posted:

Alex Salmond is a national treasure, we should have an official Alex Salmond day.



That alecsammin is such a good shot, two bullseyes and he's not even on the right side of the target. He is also the world's best golfer.

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames
Don't mention golf courses !!

twoot
Oct 29, 2012

keep punching joe posted:

Alex Salmond is a national treasure, we should have an official Alex Salmond day.



The OP is highly lacking without the goldmine that is Alex Salmond wearing hats



Obliterati
Nov 13, 2012

Pain is inevitable.
Suffering is optional.
Thunderdome is forever.
While we're at it:



Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames
Why did his advisors let him go out looking like Kim Jong Il?

twoot
Oct 29, 2012

Pissflaps posted:

Why did his advisors let him go out looking like Kim Jong Il?

The Kim suit is just too drat comfortable to avoid

Gonzo McFee
Jun 19, 2010
Salmond can do anything. Here he is after making a giant biscuit self aware.



Shamelessly stolen from the Angry Salmond twitter.

Bozza
Mar 5, 2004

"I'm a really useful engine!"
Greetings Scottish posters (and Pissflaps), small aside from the political death of Labour in the north... I have applied for a job in Glasgow, which I run a reasonable shot of getting. This obviously means moving to Glasgow from Reading, probably in the new year.

Are there many Glasgow based goons who'd be up for letting a sassenach bastard like me buy them a pint? I'm probably going to end up living around the Queens Park / Shawlands area.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pope Guilty
Nov 6, 2006

The human animal is a beautiful and terrible creature, capable of limitless compassion and unfathomable cruelty.

twoot posted:

The OP is highly lacking without the goldmine that is Alex Salmond wearing hats




  • Locked thread