Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
ChairMaster
Aug 22, 2009

by R. Guyovich

Quidam Viator posted:

I'm trying to make some sense out of this shitshow of a thread, because I will freely admit that I am no expert on this situation.

Somebody directly answer this question: Do we expect the rate of technological progress to slow in an appreciable way that will stem the now-centuries-old process of the devaluation of human labor? If not, how can anyone imagine human labor continuing to have value as our technology is increasingly outpacing all human endeavors in terms of productivity, efficiency, and reliability?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/16/science/century-long-study-will-examine-effects-of-artificial-intelligence.html?_r=1

I certainly can't.

I also can't really figure out what people's solution to that problem is gonna be, if not a basic income. I mean I imagine someone's proposed something in one of these huge rear end posts, but I'm certainly not up to the task of finding it. The only other solution I can think of is something like "employ half the population as police to beat the poo poo out of the other half who all have no jobs or money at all". I guess it'd work, but I dunno if anyone's gonna actually get behind that without some pretty obfuscating language at least.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread