Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
The Action Man
Oct 26, 2004

This is a good movie.

CobiWann posted:

You have chosen very, very wisely. All those ranged from "decently solid" with ...ish to "fantastic" with Colditz/Seasons of Fear to "amazing" with The Chimes of Midnight.

And :psyboom: for The Holy Terror.

As an aside, a conversation with a friend today led to a neat idea of a IDW/Dynamite Comics crossover. The Sixth Doctor...and Ash Williams.

A part of me is still waiting for the Quantum Leap/Doctor Who crossover.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Action Man
Oct 26, 2004

This is a good movie.
Doctor Who - It's not IF Moffat peaked, it's WHEN

The Action Man
Oct 26, 2004

This is a good movie.

DoctorWhat posted:

I'm booking for a London trip, for partially-unrelated reasons

I can picture Gomez' Master having a companion dressed like Six just so she could make fun of the Doctor's old clothes.

"Don't get me started on that Question Mark Jumper!"

The Action Man
Oct 26, 2004

This is a good movie.

Jerusalem posted:

No, because the "Linear <x>" thing is incredibly stupid and dumb and idiotic and stupid and dumb and stupid and stupid. :mad:

That way, Season 6b madness lies.

What's the Linear Doctor? I tried Googling it, but I keep getting DW tshirts as search results.

The Action Man
Oct 26, 2004

This is a good movie.

Jerusalem posted:

To be honest, I do worry I'm kind of cluttering up the thread with these reviews, but I figured it's the quiet part of the year for Doctor Who news anyway. Still, I'd be more than happy to see any other aspect of the show (classic, revival etc) be brought up, I just hope I'm not scaring people off with all this talk about a different aspect of the show.

I'll bite. I love your reviews, Jerusalem, but I've been meaning to start a conversation about the BBC for a while.

Can we talk about how the funding for Doctor Who and the BBC works? I'm an American, so the fact that Doctor Who can't use its profits from merchandising for the actual show's production confuses me.

I understand that the BBC is government owned and controlled, but I'm not sure how exactly that works, either. Does Doctor Who get renewed for a new series by the BBC execs or by government officers? or are BBC execs government officers?

I just want an outline of how Doctor Who gets approved, financed, and renewed by the BBC. Examples from actual Doctor Who production would really help.

I worry this sounds like I'm trying to get this forum to do my homework for me, but I'm honestly just an American nerd that doesn't understand your UK Parliament and state run media.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Action Man
Oct 26, 2004

This is a good movie.

Bicyclops posted:

The BBC is run by the goofy hat Time Lords of Classic Who.

This explains so much about Series 3 of Sherlock.

Dave Brookshaw posted:

The BBC isn't government owned or controlled - its independence from government is in its Royal Charter. It's a corporation (BBC stands for British Broadcasting Corporation) with a Trust who act as oversight. The Royal Charter defines the BBC as existing to serve the public interest by informing, educating, and entertaining the people. They have a list of "public purposes" they aim to meet: http://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/insidethebbc/whoweare/publicpurposes

It's funded largely through fees collected from citizens when they renew their licenses to own a TV. Our current government is variously cool or outright hostile to it, as they're largely in the pockets of Rupert Murdoch they think its existence hurts the commercial tv stations. Some of those stations do actually receive some licence fee funding to support their public-interest activities, but not a lot.

Doctor Who's renewal has nothing to do with government. Like any programming, it's down to the BBC's own internal hierarchy - the Head of Drama for BBC Wales (Doctor Who since the revival has been made by the Welsh branch of the corporation), the Controller for BBC 1 (the channel it's made for) and ultimately the Director of TV.

Could Parliament change the BBC's charter or perhaps remove it's funding via these fees? Is it possible for the BBC to restructure so that Doctor Who's production was funded from merchandising profits?

  • Locked thread