Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

wateroverfire posted:

Maybe. Probably we'd be a failed state limping by on international aid. Chile didn't have the massive human and physical capital reserves to plunder that Argentina did when it decided to run itself into the ground.

According to D&D the solution to economic and political problem in every country is to just go more leftwards

The less they know about the issue the more true this is

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

Badger of Basra posted:

Wow do we have two Pinochetistas in one thread?

This is seriously like the left-wing version of a tea party rally.

Everything left of Reagan/right of Allende is Communism/Fascism respectively.

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

Ardennes posted:

"This thread is too left-wing" isn't an argument you know.

Ultimately though you can ultimately argue that any Latin America thread will be the reverse of an Eastern European one. In Latin America, the US was the dominant interventionist force that spread its ideology through authoritarian regimes.

It is when the name "Pinochet" gets used as an excuse not to have to talk actual economic reforms and zombie Reagan Allende is the solution to all problems.

The 1973 coup and executing people in soccer stadium was pretty terrible, but people honestly seem to care more about reliving the rage than having an earnest discussion about modern day Chile.

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

Badger of Basra posted:

When people still trumpet him as the man who saved Chile, and their current president was tortured by his dictatorship, and her father was assassinated for opposing the coup, you can see why people might want to. You can't discuss modern day Chile without discussing Pinochet because his legacy is still tainting the country.

But this discussion isn't even about the legacy of Pinochet, however terrible it was. There are plenty of threads in D&D where we talk about how terrible he was.

It seems like OP proposed some right wing policy and since it is Chile it automatically set off the rage factor, and everyone decided to just call the OP a Pinochist and call it a day. If you think the policies he's outlining are bad (and some of it seems to be) or unreasonable or you have a better solution, you should post it. But right wing+Chile=Pinochet is just lazy debating.

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

computer parts posted:

The general idea of 1 & 2 seem reasonable enough, maybe adjust some specific payouts. 3 seems like you just need to allow overtime and the other stuff about working from home.

Is there any real disadvantage of a generous unemployment welfare system vs rigorous regulation of hiring/firing in the chilean context or in general?

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

Ardennes posted:

It most likely kicked off because the OP started the thread asking for the US military to kick out a center-left moderate because of educational reforms. He has walked back from it, but it is pretty directly comparable to how the Eastern Europe thread reacts to pro-Russian posters (though Putin is ironically right-wing), just the shoe is on the other foot.


Granted I'm not a big expert on D&D user political views but I thought the "US carrier group" thing was a joke, though I guess if he was serious yeah it's not exactly a good idea for obvious reasons.

quote:

Anyway, I have gone over his points and most of them see unsustainable beyond some pretty basic things like "workplace fraud isn't good." Spending money on educational is a super left-wing idea I know, but is going to be needed.

Ultimately, the present government in Chile is quite center-leftist, and the Communists are a very minor part of the coalition compared to Christian Democrats.

What's wrong with having a more flexible labor market and better unemployment benefit vs a more rigid one?

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

Ardennes posted:

One issue is revenue, and Chile doesn't have corporate taxes in a classical sense which has where the government gets revenue. It does have a progressive income tax and profits from business are suppose to be included under it but the government still doesn't have enough money to work with it.

Also, losing your job by getting sick isn't going to be really replaced by unemployment benefits which likely aren't going to cover your full costs. Basically, the employer is going to gain an advantage over their employees because the unemployment system is likely never going to be a replacement for an actual job.

So if major reforms are instituted (like actually cutting those protections) it is almost certainly a net loss for workers, and to be honest, I don't think Chile's issue really are those protections in the first place.

Since you do seem to know more about modern Chile than me, how does corporate taxes in Chile work?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Typo
Aug 19, 2009

Chernigov Military Aviation Lyceum
The Fighting Slowpokes

England Sucks posted:

It probably has something to do with Chile being in a privileged position in South America of having a great amount of exportable goods and a very small population with comparably low unemployment, crime, and high education standards. Of course for a American it's probably a utter shithole with few redeeming qualities which needs to be more like America. But most South Americans wish to live in a country like Chile.

The same is true of Argentina and natural gas, it's just that the government seems to be distinctively less successful there.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply