|
ExecuDork posted:both of the people with a dumb look on their faces is entirely the photog's fault. Naw, those are just candids. The couple will cherish those unscripted moments their entire life! "HAW HAW honey, remember when you looked like you were getting ready to spit at our wedding? That was the best!"
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 14:27 |
|
|
I like how putting his name in a search engine doesn't reveal a single photograph attributed to him.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 8, 2016 17:04
|
|
|
I'd like to see a couple of Mitchell's photos to compare them against someone defending those atrocities.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 17, 2016 17:03
|
|
|
You know he spent like a week pouring through his exhaustive 8 bit music collection to find the perfect clip to pair with his personality and prepare the viewer for what they're about to see.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2016 15:59
|
|
|
I like how his GNP selections have absolutely none of the scenery that makes the park famous. I assume all the other collections are the same but couldn't stomach clicking on them. And his B&W series is just converted color photographs.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2016 20:24
|
|
|
Too bad he didn't spend 15 minutes googling to find one of the ten billion websites already set up to sell photographs that only need 10 minutes to get set up. And I hope to hell his "credit card processor" is a plugin from an established business because that's a new level of stupid if he's trying to handle payments on his own. (not that anyone is ever going to buy anything)
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2016 21:11
|
|
|
Well the jig is up, Ansel didn't take good photos because of skills he just made a short prayer to Jesus to send the perfect photons through his lens. God probably did all the dodging and burning too.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
The extra weight might make it more stable if bumped. So wood is not better in any way that matters.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Piss off scrub, do you even know how flash memory works? The camera is literally using electricity to shock atoms in the SD card to indicate a 1 or a 0. What Sandisk doesn't want you to know though is that there is a "ghost" effect at play.. the atoms remember the original value and if you try to write new data on top of it the storage "averages" the old with the new, resulting in low contrast photos. You can compensate for this in Lightroom up to a point by cranking up the saturation, but you still have to live with owning originals that aren't accurate depictions of the scene as you visited it. You really need to be using a brand new SD card with each shoot.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
Yes but you're actually creating soul when you copy it to your computer, back it up to your local backup drive, and then upload it later on to glacier. Then you upload the edited version to flickr, meaning you have X*3 amount of their soul (don't forget to subtract some soul if you slap a stupid watermark on the flickr export). No one will say no to that, that's free soul!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
Those pictures probably look fine to him because his perception of reality is so skewed.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2017 16:02
|
|
|
I had no idea all you had to do to avoid censure was to forbid it. This will make my life so much easier! I hereby give notice to the IRS that it is strictly forbidden to take any action against me forcing me to pay taxes.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 7, 2017 18:01
|
|
|
The internet is a harsh place, only the strong survive. Hopefully he found this thread.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2017 18:35
|
|
|
Listing off their gear and settings is a giant red flag, the smarter move was to not engage them at all.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 20, 2017 16:00
|
|
|
Well if you want to shoot wide but are a pleb who doesn't own two bodies, why not whip out an iPhone? Saves you fussing with lenses and maybe missing some action while rooting in your bag. I wouldn't do it, but I can see the thinking. That gopro though.. that's another level.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2017 04:09
|
|
|
drat, a lovely SEO web design company AND a lovely wedding photographer? How do they find the time?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
I think it's associated with high estrogen but I ain't no doctor so take that with a grain of salt.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2017 18:03
|
|
|
The only way to know when you've nailed your tone mapping is when things look like they were lazily photoshopped in.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2017 00:35
|
|
|
I wonder what the thought process was like. "ughh there's spots on the image, gently caress it, I don't want to get the tripod out again." or "oh gently caress yeah there's spirits in my photo! that will enhance my brand!"
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2017 21:17
|
|
|
Goddamn I had never stumbled into /r/photography. What a cesspool of stupid. And here I thought /r/earthporn was bad.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 30, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
Scrolling through their instagram, it's textbook dunning-kruger. They think they're emulating what successful photographers do, but lack the awareness to realize how far off they are.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2017 04:35
|
|
|
ReverendHammer posted:What successful photographer has super out of focus pics that weren't shot on like a 100+ year old camera or something? That's just full frame bokeh. Totes a thing.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2017 06:20
|
|
|
I think he's just scared of the sun and wants all photos to look like they were shot on grey days, maybe he's a vampire.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2017 05:29
|
|
|
A low contrast watermark with a gradient on it so no matter what the image is, you can't read half of it.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 29, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
People with ten thousand dollars to burn on a hobby they're probably bad at tend to act Iike the world exists to serve them.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2017 04:56
|
|
|
Yond Cassius posted:His inaugural project would be the highest-resolution, most lovingly-rendered Bristol Stool Chart ever created. In bad lighting with poor white balance and a lovely B&W conversion also attached just for funsies.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2017 19:58
|
|
|
Unfortunately his kickstarter to buy a forums account got zero backers.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2017 05:36
|
|
|
Kenny Logins posted:The watermark right down the middle is really something special "sexually" made it into the tags too. I know a lot of creeps stalk flickr for fap material but a neon caterpillar is not something I would have guessed as a fetish.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2017 20:34
|
|
|
I want to see the picture he took.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2017 17:52
|
|
|
This individual works in the white house and this is their portfolio site: http://www.politicalphotographer.co/ I appreciate that as a documentary photographer you don't get to choose the scene and lighting so they won't all be zingers, but it seems reasonable that the site you set up to show off your work should be the very best you can produce.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2017 21:53
|
|
|
SOOC is totally fine everyone, it shows you what it was really like to be there. I guess they have multiple lovely photographers because that series is attributed to an Andrea Hanks.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2017 22:57
|
|
|
Even if there is a no edit rule they're still bad because you know they're taking thousands of exposures and the ones that made it to Flickr are the best of the bunch.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2017 07:01
|
|
|
Aww you overdid it, they're gonna change their permissions once they notice.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2017 03:28
|
|
|
Bokeys are always a draw. This sample is fun because it's easy to watch the photo get better as you zoom in on the couple. At least until you get real close and realize what a distraction the lamps are.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2017 06:08
|
|
|
$40 for an effect you could get by taping tin foil to your body and poking it with a needle? Good on them for making money from stupid people buying in to a stupid idea I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2017 17:59
|
|
|
bobmarleysghost posted:I'm just questioning why does anyone need a photo of their baby's allegedly pulsating umbilical cord? I don't know about the pulsating umbilical cord, but I'll be sure to ask my wife next time she's not on shift. But "first pictures" are a big part of her job once the baby is out, gotta get a mom who can't wait to sleep, a baby who looks like a corpse, and an oblivious dad all in frame.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2017 04:49
|
|
|
They're revolutionizing light painting!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2017 14:57
|
|
|
I would like to sell my photos for several thousand dollars too, but unfortunately every exposure I take is complete trash and even worse I have realized this fact. It would be nice to be oblivious.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 3, 2018 00:28
|
|
|
Spotted in my hotel room, so I'm not surprised they use garbage for decorations but I got stuck wondering what kind of pretentious dweeb would ever consider publishing such a piece.  "Hmm yes this perfectly depicts my disdain of long exposure waterfalls, the lovely light painting was genius *uploads*" Unfortunately I couldn't find the author.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2018 20:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 14:27 |
|
|
gently caress I'm owned.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2018 21:19
|
|