|
I took a Shakespeare course last year and my readings of the plays was greatly enhanced by either a stage recording (the 1930s othello) or audio drama. It's fun to follow along, especially if you get an unabridged version. I find the way Richard in Richard III loses his power over the meta of the play really interesting. The beginning of the play had a lot of asides and almost every scene ends on a monologue from Richard, but after he assumes the throne this drops off, and he loses all mystic and power until you get his awful awful speech to his troops, highly contrasted by the end of the play. This is a pretty basic reading though. As for Hamlet, it was probably the fourth time going through it in my academic career but it all clicked. Anyway, I've been slowly going through the four hour film by Braghman and was really struck by this exchange: quote:HAMLET fantastic. Implication that women give birth to dead things (as everything will die) a follow up on the sun/son pun from the beginning (I am too much in the sun) and a grotesque idea that while the woman gives birth to dead things, what does that imply about the man? Now, it's fun to compare this layered and fascinating exchange to the "NEVER FEAR SHAKESPEARE "translation": quote:HAMLET Butchered. Absolutely, slaughtered. Abysmal. Awful. The thing that interests me the most is how grotesque the tragedy plays' worlds are. Denmark is basically bathed in blood and decaying, and you only get these small slivers of information about them through characters description or subtext. Obviously tragedies won't have fun worlds, but it really helps set the mood for them. Something something about the ghost telling hamlet about the ghost saying quote:Wouldst thou not stir in this. Now, Hamlet, hear. It feels more like Hamlet's ear is being abused here, being fed what it wants to hear.. Rankly abused indeed ziasquinn fucked around with this message at 04:32 on Jun 10, 2016 |
# ¿ Jun 10, 2016 04:27 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 12:35 |
|
That's tight
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2016 23:15 |