|
Battle: Los Angeles was everything that Terminator: Salvation should have been.
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2014 00:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 21:56 |
|
|
My hope is that the new film spends as little time as possible trying to explain it's complicated chronology; hopefully, zero time. Leave that to the internet and focus on being a good movie. Where everything fits into the timeline is literally the least important factor.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2014 18:35
|
|
|
It's a shame the Internet freaked out about the initial Terminator Salvation script, because moving the subtext of the machines from nuclear paranoia and technology-run-rampant to class conflict was updating it to be relevant to our time in the way that everybody seems to be looking for in this thread.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2015 03:53
|
|
|
I want to see the movie where Connor decides to send Reese back in time to instead prevent anyone from trying to pull the plug, resulting in Skynet building a literal singularity-driven worldwide utopia for humanity. Everyone lives happily ever after with their robo-dogs and robo-butlers.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 16:26
|
|
|
Panzeh posted:Yeah, I don't think a Future War movie could at all be really good- the Future War is a lot better when it's kind of a dreamlike nightmare- the shock is that John Connor actually won it. The movie doesn't really explain how, but it's not really necessary. Future War is great in little snippets and vignettes- it is not a good concept for a full blown movie. You can dig into some 80s dreck if you really want to see dudes with rayguns shooting robots shooting rayguns. Or watch Battle: Los Angeles.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2015 21:17
|
|