Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
rkajdi
Sep 11, 2001

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

foobardog posted:

I can kind of see most of them from a porn-negative feminist point of view, but female ejaculation?

Not that I support the porn negative view.

I think they're trying to talk about squirting, but yeah this whole law is a mess. But if passing it is the price to get the Torries to be forced out of power to die in a gutter somewhere (and then have it be repealed) is that too bad of a price?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

rkajdi
Sep 11, 2001

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

PT6A posted:

Interestingly, most of the criticism I've seen from performers/producers is from dominatrices who argue this is going to criminalize a big source of revenue for them.

Is the ban just on movies, or all kinds of sex work?

rkajdi
Sep 11, 2001

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

PT6A posted:

As far as I can tell, it only covers video pornography. Interestingly, I've also heard that it specifically applies to the production of this material in the UK. Unlike child porn, apparently viewing or possessing this sort of material is legal provided it was not produced in the UK.

So, yeah, I have no loving clue what the point of this law was/is.

To move sex work somewhere else. Sounds just like anti-homeless laws, where the goal is just to push people outside the community.

  • Locked thread