|
foobardog posted:I can kind of see most of them from a porn-negative feminist point of view, but female ejaculation? Interestingly, most of the criticism I've seen from performers/producers is from dominatrices who argue this is going to criminalize a big source of revenue for them.
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2014 19:25
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 04:39 |
|
|
rkajdi posted:Is the ban just on movies, or all kinds of sex work? As far as I can tell, it only covers video pornography. Interestingly, I've also heard that it specifically applies to the production of this material in the UK. Unlike child porn, apparently viewing or possessing this sort of material is legal provided it was not produced in the UK. So, yeah, I have no loving clue what the point of this law was/is.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2014 22:30
|
|
|
Periodiko posted:It's just movies, but I think the point is that dominatrices (is this seriously the plural?) could make money on the side by making S&M films and distributing them. That is seriously the plural. I looked it up just to make sure (apparently it's also like 'fish' where it can be its own plural!)
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2014 22:31
|
|