Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Ron Pauls Friend
Jul 3, 2004

Zak2k12 posted:

Do you have any knowledge as to what degree were the other Warsaw pact countries included in the USSR's battle plans, in case a land war erupted in Europe? Did the WarPac have an effective command structure, akin to NATO, and were their armies capable of working together, or were the Soviets just banking on using their allies as cannon fodder until the Red Army came in to do the heavy lifting?

Short story: Have the East German NVA seize West Berlin and hold off a conventional land assault from West Germany by NATO until the Red Army arrived or the hundreds of poorly guided Russian nuclear missiles glassed Rammstein/Normandy/most of Great Britain. Then hopefully the Workers of the World would rise up and overthrow their capitalist oppressors before the Americans launched their precision-guided Atlas missiles at every single Warsaw Pact installation.

As for the command structure, the East German NVA and to a much lesser extent the Romanian Army were able to stand on their own probably against a conventional NATO assault. The other nations, especially Czechoslovakia and Hungary due to their prior unpleasantness, were heavily dependent on the Red Army for "protection" and "guidance" from the decadent West. So yeah basically cannon fodder and Moscow called the shots, at least until the early 1980's.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread