Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Captainplankface posted:

Has anyone gotten the Panther 8.8 yet, how is it? Apparently it's mobility soft stats are great, making it just as if not more mobile than the FCM. Good job on the transparency wargaming :doh:

http://worldoftanks.eu/en/news/pc-browser/46/panther-88-price-reduction/
Apparently even WG got cold feet about selling a Panther II for 42 Euros.
Without pref MM it's just not worth it, unless you really REALLY want a German medium crew trainer in high level games.

sauer kraut fucked around with this message at 11:23 on Dec 30, 2014

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Nordick posted:

Actually, Accept are German.

My god they are still alive? When they became semi-successful in 1986/7, they held their 20th anniversary a year later :corsair:
That's some ooold school generic metal and it didn't age very well.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

BIG HEADLINE posted:

If they were going to put out a damned normal T8 MM tank they should have gone with a suitably debuffed premium E-50 with good terrain passage values to make up for the anemic engine they'd have to give it.

Ya the only thing that makes German tanks playable is going full fantasy 1944 blueprints, then add another 50% of armor all round for good measure and slap on battlecruiser guns.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Computer viking posted:

And in bad decision news, I just bought a FV4202 as my first T10.

It's not a bad tank at all, except that it'll supposedly be swapped for oversized Centurion hull #3 in a few months.
At least it's not a Fatton or Leopard.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

falen55 posted:

I'm working toward the SU-122-54

Did you lose a bet or why would you do that?
If you want a T-54 shaped vehicle with a big boom, you're much better served with the Chinese tier 9/10 meds.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Dalaram posted:

Is there any Data on the T-34-88 that is available on the Xbox version? Seems like it may be exclusive, and having a medium with the 88 at T-6 sounds awesome

They should have sold that thing instead of the sorry rear end T-34-85M.
Even if the turret blows off after 3 shots it would still be an improvement.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

BIG HEADLINE posted:

I think I'm going to have to knuckle under and get the Obj 140 and E5 grind done before Thursday. I free-xp'ed the M103's upgraded engine, and thanks to having 416 HEAT rounds for the mid-tier 120mm, I'm going to skip the upgraded turret and M68 and bee-line it for the E5. The minor upgrades the M68 seemingly offers for the xp spent are minimized slightly by the fact that I'll be carrying 12-15 HEAT rounds per game.

Don't skip the M103 so quickly, just like the Obl 907/268 it may be turn out to be the better tank in the end.
Never underestimate the retardation of that E5 tumor unless it has E3 armor on it :smith:

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Snakes in a can posted:

depends how the armor layout of the turret is, t-54 hull armor layout on a t8 pref can't be a good thing (a great thing if you're driving one making GBS threads on pubbies).

Pref MM is not gonna happen (again) if it has any kind of 100mm gun.
It would have to be Spershing levels of slow with 20°/s track and turret traverse, and have a historic 480hp engine for that to be even thinkable.

sauer kraut fucked around with this message at 09:06 on Jan 13, 2015

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
If you got enough credits, play pub games and have nothing else unlocked you'd be crazy not turn in the T30 for an E4.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Teron D Amun posted:

apparently the Nashorn has a hidden fixed MM attached to it, 73% out of 50 games played were in T8 which is oh so much fun with the stock gun

Higher tier matches are just a lot more common. The joys of grinding through a mature top-heavy game.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
Some streamer played the reward tanks during the beta.
Remember the siren on top of the AT-7? The 28 Concept has one of those on each side. That sliding gun mantlet is also kinda shaky.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

That's a press or dev account, he hasn't even played the T-55A yet.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Dalael posted:

After playing last beta weekende, I JUST learnt that torpedoes from torpedo planes can be launched manually. And I was being a retard, trying to fly them coming in from the right direction and at the right angle because simply clicking on a ship and letting the planes do the work by themselves was a sure way to waste a bunch of torpedoes. I was making it so hard on myself for nothing. :argh:

Thanks for this video, I know better for the next one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcvvqUvars0

That's the first gameplay of WoWS I've seen yet, not even gonna bother until torps get removed.
How can they make the same arty mistake twice :smithcloud:

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Dalael posted:

If I may, I think it would be a mistake for you not to try the game based on that gameplay footage. The game is very entertaining.
Torpedoes are most likely never going to be removed. Nerfed maybe, but not removed. Most destroyers past tier 3 or 4 use torpedoes as a main weapon. Plenty of cruisers also have torpedoes. They are in here to stay.

Arty in WoT and carriers in WoWS are not the same. The only thing that is similar is the top down view.

I see, replace torp bobmers with very slow and vulnerable Stukas maybe?
That was ridiculous. Blam you're dead even tho half my stuff missed, 2 minute coffee break, blam next one.

poo poo is not gonna fly a second time. With Tanks they had a unique game and a captive audience that got reeled in before realizing how lame high tiers are.

sauer kraut fucked around with this message at 09:42 on Feb 5, 2015

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
That's a lot of words to convey that the US tree still has everything for average pub players.

T5 T67 (formerly T49)
T6 M6
T7 T29
T8 I hope you have a premium tank for this shitshow
T9 M103, M46 Patton, T54E1
TX T57 Hvy

all US tier 6 and 7 light tanks are very good, too (well the T71 will be after the patch)

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

xthetenth posted:

If they don't use any of the many lines of defense available to them they probably deserve torps. Artillery lands before the target knows it, torps don't.

Ok, so are there ships that specialize in AA?
Something cheap and not slow that makes a carrier players life miserable.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
Anything you can comfortably do thousands of damage in whilst spotting for yourself.
For me it would probably be the M6 or Cromwell.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
http://www.twitch.tv/pukanuragan
A good Russian players is streaming the Obj 260.
And sure enough it's an IS-7 that goes 20 uphill, 45+ on flats effortless and the gun seems to be better too.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

demonR6 posted:

HAHAHA Allahu Ackbar sound mod.

9300 damage, run out of ammo, ram last enemy to death with 2% HP left.
Yup Russian server alright.

That thing is grossly OP, watch it get nerfed as soon as enough poopers get it.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
The 1945 is an average tier 7. If you're used to T29 class performance before grinding through it, you'll wanna kill yourself of course.
Or you use the 105mm gold cannon as previously mentioned.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
The pixels don't matter at all. Even if you played on a 256 colour 360p mobile phone display, you'd need a 4GHz Intel Core that runs the physics and god knows what WoT does with the CPU cycles.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
I have always dreamed of driving a Type 59 with regular MM, an M48 tumor and 1700 low penetration dpm thank you so much Wargaming.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

PerrineClostermann posted:

Anyone taken a look at not!WoT? My friend's got me an early access code to it, but I'm not sure what to make of it.

PvP is campy and snipery to the extreme, you can forget about doing any aggressive stuff until the game is already won our you'll get your face blasted. If your scouts suck/die you might aswell leave the game.

PvE is pretty chill with a group, enjoy your 0.5-1% research progress per game.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
That's just the tier 6 (and maybe 5), not the whole Jap heavy line.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
The U.S. M6 Heavy and T29 are easily obtainable and fun tanks.
The tier 8 is a roadbump unless you sling lots of APCR, but regular tier 8 sucks balls for everyone and after that it's the M103/110E5 gravy train :toot:

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
The Kranvagn looks like a 50B with a very strong turret, Comet gun depression, Russian shape frontal hull and great dpm.
The Stridsvagn is uh, a laser platform with 4300 dpm and a 4 pixel weakspot in the cupola. Imagine if you will a tier X E25 that needs to set up for 2.5s to shoot and 2s to move again. Camonet and binocs stay on while you turn in 'shooty' mode naturally.

sauer kraut fucked around with this message at 09:13 on Nov 19, 2016

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Zudgemud posted:

Does the strv103 go as fast in reverse as forward?

About 70 forward and ~45 backwards iirc. It can drive in shooty mode too, but only 5 kph.

sauer kraut fucked around with this message at 22:23 on Nov 18, 2016

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Hippyflip posted:

Hey i was just wondering if anyone could give me some advice on what line would be the most easy to learn as a newer player im looking to play heavy tanks

US heavies are the best allrounders and have all important gun depression for ridgeline work. T29 is the perfect attainable 'new player' tank, while sadly the T32 is a painful grind these days where its armor doesn't hold up and the gun doesn't cut it against nonstop tier 9/10 enemies. I really loved the M6 too for farming damage and credits early on, great gun but no armor.

Soviet KV-85 - IS-7 line dominates in cities and flat areas, and would be many peoples first choice.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
Oh my, today's special on EU is the mutant

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

appropriatemetaphor posted:

Is there a mode where it's not just getting stomped by tanks a few levels above you? Or is it always a level spread.

Only play tier 9, they are almost never outclassed against tier 10, the matchmaking is much less harsh, and they stomp on anything smaller.

If you don't want to grind that high, there is only a very limited number of tech tree tanks that will not make you want to kill yourself dealing with +2 matchmaking.
For me that was the Cromwell and Chinese light tanks, but it will vary from player to player :smith:

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Emnity posted:

So I have a decision to make, IS-M or IS-3? (Eventually both but suggestions for first choice and why would be helpful)

IS-M is more of a specialist line for people love doing the sidescraping turtle corner dance, they are very very good at it though
IS-3 for generalist Soviet heavies, can't go wrong with them ever so maybe start with that

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
Someone call the Library of Congress to have circons latest stream in its entirety preserved as aesthetically relevant, aka rolling over tier 7 while the tryhards are ushered to ranked mode:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/230672630

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Hellsau posted:

dude it's not even the most unpleasant tier 6 churchill

I'm not sure about that, the 32pdr on the garbage carrier is pretty nice and gets 10 gun depression. That's all you need to ship some damage before you die and get to play a better tank.
If someone put a gun to my head I'd pick that over a 8 hp/ton driving weakspot equipped with a gun unfit for same tier mediums.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

BadLlama posted:

Hell a premium KV-2 I would buy but a premium KV-2 with a dumbass 40k skin, take my house wargaming.

You can take the skin off and get a normal KV2 I think? QB did it in his review video.
Anyway, much of the price is probably for the full Soviet BIA crew, which is gonna sell like hotcakes :smith:

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

Duzzy Funlop posted:

Wait, why again?

https://eu.wargaming.net/shop/wot/filter/?cd=2113

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

ZogrimAteMyHamster posted:

Everything about it just loving blows. All it does is miss and fail at getting anywhere in time.

The whole IS-M line is about sitting angled on corners and slugging it out at close range.
If that's not your jam, pull the plug now.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
The entire Polish tech tree is an odorous garbage fire.
Abort if you're grinding it atm, there is no rainbow at the end of that tunnel :smith:

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

500 games in the indien with 38% winrate is something to think about. At least he almost got to 44% on the Leo PTA.

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004

icantfindaname posted:

I have both the Pershing and the Cent 1 unlocked, which line is better?

Both US Pattons are pretty amazing allrounders, the tier 8's and stock 9's are an awful grind either way.
Cent7 is a nice poking in/out on a ridgeline, but its squishy long hull and low RoF make it bad anywhere else. Tier tier 10 Cent is.. a squishy, worse Patton 48? Never played it tbh.

sauer kraut fucked around with this message at 07:17 on Dec 31, 2018

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sauer kraut
Oct 2, 2004
Hey I'm a little late to the wheeled party, but just elited the AMD and started with the Hotchkiss.
The AMD was a lot of fun, blasting Type64s, Hellcats and the like with 200 damage high pen HE on the move whilst not having a care in the world.
Now the Hotch seems to be the exact same thing? You go a little faster forwards, much slower in reverse and you got 10m more view range. But the enemies are much tougher or dug in and generally have better crews/equip. All the fun is suddenly gone :smith:
Am I missing something? It's probably important to note that I only play tier 6 plus good 7's and my singular tier 8 premium, no intention of going any higher up the line.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply