|
Mister Adequate posted:I think it might be Heinlein during one of his Full Fascist phases, but I don't know. States are in no way capable of being disinterested.
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2015 05:07 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 04:51 |
|
Mister Adequate posted:Of course they're not, but they should still try. But they do have interest in a given outcome. It's just the nature of the beast. http://www.democracynow.org/2015/1/1/who_goes_to_jail_matt_taibbi Sorry for linking to Matt Taibbi, but the point still stands.
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2015 18:46 |
|
Mister Adequate posted:Oh I'm sorry, I used the term "factual innocence" and states are absolutely interested in an objective and unbiased review of such cases, in no way deliberately sabotaging efforts to demonstrate a wrongful conviction. So the actual legal term factual innocence is not something I can demonstrate and, of course, this means no innocent person, or person whose prosecution falls far short of the truly high bar needed to warrant execution, has ever been executed. Right, and what I'm saying is that it isn't possible. A state is not a neutral arbiter between groups in society.
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2015 20:05 |