|
As a Millennial I posted:i don't believe you Believe whatever you want. The picture was the screen cap.
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 18:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 00:12 |
|
|
to sum it up google is poo poo, sv is poo poo, and nobody wants to ride a public bus with poors
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:00
|
|
|
colbylol posted:to sum it up google is poo poo, sv is poo poo, and nobody wants to ride a public bus with poors California is pretty poo poo as a whole.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:00
|
|
|
Those busses are actually p sweet and have good wifi
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
i've never been to san francisco in my life but boy do i have opinions about it
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:08
|
|
|
buses are gently caress tarded, especially if they ride in car lanes. now trams, trams are good in my book
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:12
|
|
|
i never understood the revulsion at riding the bus
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:16
|
|
|
its wiggly, slow, and often dirty as well
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
our own municipal bus system is glacial, circuitous poo poo if you're going from one suburb to another but if you need to go from your house to a place lots of people want to go, like the mall or the rink or to work, then it is good and a drat sight better than parking
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
really trams are the final solution but they do require a bit of infrastructure work too bad the us filled their cities with freeways
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:24
|
|
|
newreply.php posted:really trams are the final solution but they do require a bit of infrastructure work mono = one rail = rail
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:i never understood the revulsion at riding the bus racism.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
^well that explains it, canadians are just racist against the other language group and natives, and it's not like you can look at someone and tell with any certainty expropriate everything and build proper light rail
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:27
|
|
|
OK, I read some articles. Poor people don't give a poo poo about the buses. Middle class people that are being inconvenienced in some way by google buses are using social equality as a reason for why we should care about whether or not google has shuttles.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:30
|
|
|
you can really sniff out koolaid drinking SV cocksuckers in yospos at 100 yards now
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:32
|
|
|
i'm glad that is settled now, we can all go home
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:33
|
|
|
keyvin posted:OK, I read some articles. Poor people don't give a poo poo about the buses. Middle class people that are being inconvenienced in some way by google buses are using social equality as a reason for why we should care about whether or not google has shuttles. it's almost like vicarious offense is a way to get what you want
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:34
|
|
|
flakeloaf posted:it's almost like vicarious offense is a way to get what you want The poor have
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:37
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:you can really sniff out koolaid drinking SV cocksuckers in yospos at 100 yards now You really need to clean the dried semen off your monitor if you can smell anything on a screen at 100 yards.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 19:43
|
|
|
lol, this fuckin guy
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 20:04
|
|
|
keyvin posted:You really need to clean the dried semen off your monitor if you can smell anything on a screen at 100 yards. I smell you. because you smell like poop. and it comes through the computer
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 20:07
|
|
|
Bloody posted:why? the company pays taxes, which subsidize mass transit, which includes buses. why not ride the bus? gee i wonder how many rich computer nerds are going to sign up to ride two county bus systems with at least one transfer and dozens of stops
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 20:18
|
|
|
Idk what this argument is about but i'm betting that guy sucks one mean rear end dick
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 20:19
|
|
|
the alternative to private "google bus" type coach systems isn't a hundred nerds riding county bus systems. it's a hundred nerds clogging the highway with individually driven "sports sedans" private buses provided by employers are not the worst thing you could have on the roads
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 20:19
|
|
|
keyvin posted:OK, I read some articles. Poor people don't give a poo poo about the buses. Middle class people that are being inconvenienced in some way by google buses are using social equality as a reason for why we should care about whether or not google has shuttles. yes pretty much. the primary complaint is people not wanting googlers in "their" neighborhood, which is understandable but the bus thing is a stupid thing to try to make an issue out of.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 20:21
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:the alternative to private "google bus" type coach systems isn't a hundred nerds riding county bus systems. it's a hundred nerds clogging the highway with individually driven "sports sedans" no it's not. it's called having a work/life balance and having an apartment that isn't shared six ways by startup nerds hot bunking, so that you can loving telecommute like all good tech workers should be doing. shocker here come all the bay dorkwads saying "bbbbbbbut i like going to work and getting cafeteria food in the ball pit" yeah it's because you're renting a dryer box for $2875 a month, i wouldnt want to stay home either the fact that we force people to clog up transit networks to show up in a different building, to write code while talking to some guy in another state on Hangouts, is shameful as fk
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 20:21
|
|
|
telecommuting is garbage i like doing it myself because it's easy, and it makes me uninterruptible. i loving hate it when peers, clients, underlings etc are out of the office. it makes communication a nightmare. and gently caress hangouts forever tia
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 20:26
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:no it's not. it's called having a work/life balance and having an apartment that isn't shared six ways by startup nerds hot bunking, so that you can loving telecommute like all good tech workers should be doing. shocker here come all the bay dorkwads saying "bbbbbbbut i like going to work and getting cafeteria food in the ball pit" yeah it's because you're renting a dryer box for $2875 a month, i wouldnt want to stay home either u mad??
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 20:27
|
|
|
does anyone in the ball pit even remember local bus
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 20:36
|
|
|
keyvin posted:And it prevents the city buses from operating? If so, sanfran should do something. That isn't a problem inherent with google operating shuttles. That is what I am saying. There is nothing inherently wrong with a private company offering a bus service, but it should be complimenting the existing bus service, i.e. with public routes etc. That's all I'm saying, it can and should be managed better. Of course that's stupid because in an Ideal world, San Francisco wouldn't be a sprawling libertarian piece of poo poo city. Shaggar posted:yes pretty much. the primary complaint is people not wanting googlers in "their" neighborhood, which is understandable but the bus thing is a stupid thing to try to make an issue out of. Yea I assume the typical San Franciscan reaction to it is just petty NIMBY bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 21:04
|
|
|
the buses were originally attacked because they were really visible symbols of gentrification - which is reasonable - but then people basically forgot their original point and actually started arguing that the buses were bad for some trifling rear end reasons
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 21:13
|
|
|
A New York Analogy: *move to Williamsburg in 2007* *drink craft beer and artisanal cocktails* *complain about gentrification and hipsters in 2014*
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 21:18
|
|
|
Gentrification actually owns
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 21:30
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:A New York Analogy: tftfy
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
this never stops being relevant
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:this never stops being relevant Seems like things just get better everywhere, look at those land values! To the MOON!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 22:07
|
|
|
Reminds me of a clickhole article: "Young man saves struggling neighborhood by replacing everyone in it."
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 22:46
|
|
|
Powercrazy posted:That is what I am saying. There is nothing inherently wrong with a private company offering a bus service, but it should be complimenting the existing bus service, i.e. with public routes etc. That's all I'm saying, it can and should be managed better. It is managed fine - the purpose is to serve google employees. If mass transit is a priority for whatever chucklefucks run S.F. they can license the ability to run shuttle services in the city at a high rate, or tax them based on number of riders. That is how public services are supposed to be funded - taxes. I do not want to live in a world where I have to depend on corporate benevolence for public services. It has nothing to do with buses, it has to do with elected officials not giving a poo poo about poor people (because they can't or don't vote).
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 22:53
|
|
|
Dolomite posted:sorry, i only ride upper deckers don't post my defecation habits
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 22:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 00:12 |
|
|
Shaggar posted:also busses are bad in general and really should be banned from roads youre' thinking of privately owned automobiles
|
|
#
?
Jan 5, 2015 22:55
|
|