|
Dewgy posted:I can't really call his cartoons "not racist" knowing that but at least it's some sort of pre-WWW ironic humor form of racism. Makes me feel a little bit better about existence. Oh no, they used a wrong form of satire!
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 21:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 20:06 |
|
|
steinrokkan posted:I hope you get murdered by a proud freedom fighter for your crimes of fighting a societal problem with its own caricature. How could that be hypocritical? I'm using racist imagery to respond to the racism directed at me. Charlie Hebdo using racist imagery is something completely different.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:How could that be hypocritical? I'm using racist imagery to respond to the racism directed at me. Charlie Hebdo using racist imagery is something completely different. You are a racist, of course you miss the point.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 21:46
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:How could that be hypocritical? I'm using racist imagery to respond to the racism directed at me. Charlie Hebdo using racist imagery is something completely different. It's only legitimate if it's you doing it 
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 22:03
|
|
I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!
|
SedanChair posted:I actually bought this avatar for myself because people kept buying avatars for me that were more racist, but less funny. You spent money so that others could see that? You published racist art?
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 22:47
|
|
|
boom boom boom posted:You spent money so that others could see that? You published racist art? He's racist - no wonder.
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 22:51
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:He's racist - no wonder. Pretty sure as a black person SedanChair lacks the necessary institutional power to qualify him as a racist. So unlike Charlie Hebdo who are white dudes publishing racist drivel to critizise other racists, SedanChair technically isn't a racist but only somebody who distributes racist images for his own amusement. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 22:57
|
|
|
Randler posted:Pretty sure as a black person SedanChair lacks the necessary institutional power to qualify him as a racist. So unlike Charlie Hebdo who are white dudes publishing racist drivel to critizise other racists, SedanChair technically isn't a racist but only somebody who distributes racist images for his own amusement. As a ictim of racial profiling, I feel I can emphasize with him! 
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 23:01
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:As a ictim of racial profiling, I feel I can emphasize with him! You were saying?
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 23:20
|
|
You guys are going pretty HAM on this 
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 23:25
|
|
|
At this point I think the thread has started to eat itself and devolve into mediocre quality trolling again. Maybe we should review Charb's book or something before it gets boring and poo poo up (instead of just poo poo up).
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 23:30
|
|
|
Content: Oh Sacrament: Vatican allows gay marriage! ("Sakra" is a
|
|
#
?
Jun 6, 2015 23:37
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:AA, is A Wyatt Mann not actually racist in context? I wasn't expecting to see Answer Me! referenced when I clicked that link, but I was pretty sure I'd see Boyd Rice somewhere. He's labeled NON in that photo.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 00:22
|
|
|
I'll tell you what. Could one of you kids go over to that keg, and get me a red cup, and fill it about halfway with beer? Thanks. Just before the Internet, print and primative video culture got really weird for a while. There were lots of zines, and lots of locally produced late-night TV. Anyway, eventually you would stumble upon the Loompanics Book Catalog. In my opinion, most of the really controversial content on the Internet today could be traced to that catalog. It's a loving free speech Necronomicon. Oops, gramps has gotta go now.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 00:52
|
|
Disinterested posted:You guys are going pretty HAM on this Some days it seems like there's a large swathe of the Western world that desperately wants to validate the ISIS/Boko Haram belief that Islam is incompatible with modernity.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 04:28
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:You are a racist, of course you miss the point.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 04:47
|
|
|
rudatron posted:Sedanchair isn't racist, you just need to know the context/incident his av is referring to. Sedanchair declared in this very thread that context doesn't matter when it comes to racist images.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 05:06
|
|
ALL-PRO SEXMAN posted:Sedanchair declared in this very thread that context doesn't matter when it comes to racist images. Nice temper tantrum, that will show him where he went wrong.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 05:08
|
|
|
ALL-PRO SEXMAN posted:Sedanchair declared in this very thread that context doesn't matter when it comes to racist images.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 05:09
|
|
|
captainblastum posted:It's a racist image no matter if he bought it, somebody else bought it for him, or somebody gave it to him for free with mod powers. I don't see how that contradicts his position that racist imagery is racist. How do we know that the person was not merely satirzing racist imagery?
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 08:03
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:How do we know that the person was not merely satirzing racist imagery? Effectronica posted:Some days it seems like there's a large swathe of the Western world that desperately wants to validate the ISIS/Boko Haram belief that Islam is incompatible with modernity. you guys are terrible (protip: "in this case, using racist imagery to make a non racist point makes sense and calling it an endorsement of racism is dumb and wrong" does not mean "every racist image ever is good", and "the overreaction of arch conservative muslims reflects badly on them also killing people is bad" does not mean "browns are literally apes lol")
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 08:09
|
|
blowfish posted:you guys are terrible Protip: A professional tip: a tip for the pros: the guilty flee when no man pursueth, and defend themselves when general statements are made.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 12:15
|
|
|
Calling it now: Effectronica is actually performance art.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 12:17
|
|
|
Oh well. Maybe Charlie Chaplin was only mad at Hitler for stealing his moustache.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 18:01
|
|
|
Yeah, the guy the police shot in Boston really was originally gunning for Pamela Geller. Just to save everybody five minutes of research. There's a video that apparently shows exactly what happened, and everybody who has seen it agrees about what it shows. It's not even a little ambiguous, and the witnesses who offered conflicting accounts are now themselves suspects. bitey fucked around with this message at 21:48 on Jun 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 21:23
|
|
|
rudatron posted:Sedanchair isn't racist, you just need to know the context/incident his av is referring to. I don't believe so, everything I've seen from him contains his racist avatar, which makes all his posts racist.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 21:55
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:I don't believe so, everything I've seen from him contains his racist avatar, which makes all his posts racist. You're welcome to keep grinding on this, but it sure sounds like trying to shut down minorities to me. Which is actually what most of the newfound CH supporters have as a primary interest. Just a little bit of digging and it spills on out, death threats and all.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 22:42
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:You're welcome to keep grinding on this, but it sure sounds like trying to shut down minorities to me. Which is actually what most of the newfound CH supporters have as a primary interest. I'm trying to shut down minorities by making fun of a white guy on an obscure forum.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 22:44
|
|
|
Who's this white guy?
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 22:46
|
|
|
I don't want to backseat moderate but this poo poo should prolly be closed
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 22:46
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Who's this white guy? You.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 22:52
|
|
|
Tezzor posted:Why do you take at face value the unsubstantiated claims of police after they just killed a guy? As I understand it, the cops (in this case, the FBI) had been following this suspect for a while because he was talking about his intentions on social media. They'd tapped his phone. He talked about wanting to kill Pamela Geller, then he talked about settling for killing cops with some knives he bought on Amazon. So three cops tried to confront him. He had expressed the desire to kill cops with one of the knives he bought on Amazon; and sure enough, he lunged at the cops with one of those knives, so they shot him. The whole thing was captured on video. The video was first shown to community leaders, and then to the family of the deceased. It may be released publically. If you have a convincing counter-claim, I'd love to hear it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 22:55
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:You. Not me pal.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 22:58
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Not me pal. As a white supremacist and a racist, you are the problem, man. That's the image you decided to present of yourself.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 23:02
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:As a white supremacist and a racist, you are the problem, man. That's the image you decided to present of yourself. But I am literally not able to do that.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 23:09
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:But I am literally not able to do that. You are unable to do what? Unable to be a racist? That sounds like something a racist would use to protect himself, "I was raised as a tolerant guy, I cna't be a racist." The thing is, you are a racist, no matter what you say in your defense. Because you defense has no impact on the previous, pure acts of yours.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 23:14
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:You are unable to do what? Unable to be a racist? That sounds like something a racist would use to protect himself, "I was raised as a tolerant guy, I cna't be a racist." Haha no that's not the reason. I can't be racist toward black people.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 23:20
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Haha no that's not the reason. I can't be racist toward black people. Why can't you be racist towards black people? There were many Slavic people racist against Slavic people under Nazi occupation. Why should you be an exemption? Not to mention you are a white supremacist.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 23:22
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Haha no that's not the reason. I can't be racist toward black people. I have never heard of a member of any race aiding , abetting, or enthusiastically carrying out the systematic oppression of members of his own race. Since we are apparently unable to avoid making anything and everything about race politics and minorities, this seems like the most productive line of reasoning. get hosed, you deluded moron SedanChair posted:You're welcome to keep grinding on this, but it sure sounds like trying to shut down minorities to me. Which is actually what most of the newfound CH supporters have as a primary interest. i am currently masturbating furiously to the thought of crushing the will (and skulls) of arabs, roma, and generic brown people under my Boot of Oppression (tm)  e: I also notice your not-so-subtle attempt at backtracking, since you previously criticised Charlie Hebdo as racist and evil (which is not true), while now you have retreated to the position of evil racists who have recently found out about the existence of Charlie Hebdo and for ill-defined reasons make a show of supporting it being racist and evil (which is self evident and has been pointed out e.g. by the staff of Charlie Hebdo) Shortly after people pointed out that by the standards previously set out by yourself you would be a racist, that is 
suck my woke dick fucked around with this message at 23:34 on Jun 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 23:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 20:06 |
|
|
SedanChair performs worse than a 1920s minstrel show promoter in defending the minorities he claims to protect.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2015 23:30
|
|