Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Annointed posted:

Angry Joe has another run in with Copyright. This time it's Nintendo. Funny since I thought that after the incident and the stupid discussions (shout matches), they were okay with Let's Plays and reviews.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koX-Ny6zHdM&

Still don't have any idea how people are quick to defend corporations when often the corporations in question often don't seem to care about the customers.

He is such a giant baby :laffo:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Tracula posted:

Thank you for the opinion Genocyber. I know you need to browse other threads between telling everyone to git gud at Dark Souls.

I don't see how that has anything to do with anything.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

This is a bit of an odd request, but I remember watching a review/analysis thing of the OVA Roots Search a few years ago. It was in the style of most of the Channel Awesome stuff at the time in its format IIRC. I figured it would have been a Bennett the Sage thing but looking on his site that appears to not be the case. It's driving me crazy that I can't find this again and I'm wondering if anyone here knows what's I'm remembering.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Alaois posted:

It's definitely not it, but Chip and Ironicus did an Anime Theater of Roots Search during the No More Heroes 2 LP

http://chipandironicus.com/videos/anime/25.html

poo poo, that might actually be it and my memory is just rear end.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

I was so excited for the Switch with the initial reveal but I have to agree Nintendo bungled it hard with their recent presentation and the direction they seem to want to go with, i.e. more gimmicky poo poo (HD rumble lol). For me the only reason to get a switch would be for the new Zelda and that's something best saved for later when a bundle comes out. To keep this a little more relevant to the thread's topic:

nine-gear crow posted:

Like, 8 times out of 10 I generally disregard anything that comes out of Jim Sterling's smug, self-important mouth, but the man has been a loving soothsayer when it comes to Nintendo relentlessly shooting itself in the foot with its unending stream of terrible decisions. I've been generally cold to the idea of the Nintendo Switch since I first saw, and seeing Jim come out with both barrels against it this week has reaffirmed my decision to not even bother with the thing.

You do realize that most of his smugness is a trait that he's playing up for a character, right? If you watch his non-scripted stuff he comes across as a lot more reasonable.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Max Wilco posted:

I admit, I haven't really followed the Nintendo Switch reveal info, so I don't know what all the fuss is over the online stuff. All I know about the Switch is that Mario Odyssey looks cool, and it makes me wonder if I should bother buying more games for Wii U, since it seem like some of them are going to be ported over to the Switch.

The fuss over the online stuff is that it'll be a paid service that makes PSN and Xbox Gold look like a shining beacon of online services. Probably the most controversial point revealed is that, as part of the service, you will get one free SNES/NES game per month on a temporary basis, and that as soon as the month is over you have to pay to continue to play that game even if you're subscription is still active.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Beefstew posted:

As I'm exposed to more and more Spongebob shitposts and such, I'm really starting to regret not watching it as a kid.

This could just be nostalgia speaking but early Spongebob is honestly pretty good. Worth having around if you need to watch something with a younger relative/child at least.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Beefstew posted:

I actually have seen that first Spongebob Movie and it's fantastic.

I assume they meant after cause that's the same metric I use. Up to and including the movie Spongebob is great, it's after that that it turns into a weird Ren and Stimpy sort of gross-out show.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Yeah a complaint I often see about NV is the lack of depth with Caesar's Legion, and I think it's even an admitted failing on the part of the developers, but honestly I feel it works. They're a lovely slaver society and them lacking any real moral depth is kind of a good thing, even if they do end up being comically edgy at times (wolf hat dude being a prime example of that).

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Yardbomb posted:

MGSV had the opposite effect as well, where Kiefer Sutherland was presumably so loving expensive to have on that it's almost a shock when Big Boss says more than a single word in a scene.

I don't know if this is 100% true but I heard that Venom actually had a lot more lines (recorded by Kiefer even!) that Kojima decided to cut with the purpose of making him more passive, or something like that.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

I disagree with his assertion that the Souls games, even including Bloodborne, have average-at-best combat, but I do agree with his general opinion that Demon's Souls is better thanks to all that weird poo poo. World tendency was terribly designed but it's a cool idea and more novel than most of the mechanics in DS3, for example. He seems to attribute that to a "design by committee/the game got popular" sort of thing which I agree is dumb, but I do think FromSoft started to get a little too comfortable with the formula and not trying enough novel stuff.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Bakeneko posted:

What does it matter who a bunch of Youtube personalities went to dinner with? It’s not like they’re all suddenly best friends or anything, and even if they were it wouldn’t be anyone else’s business but theirs.

The issue is more with the photo op which frames it as a "we're all friends here" situation, suggesting both sides are equal and giving the hateful bigots a small amount of legitimacy.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Tired Moritz posted:

im sorry, guy I randomly meet on a convention, in order to hang out with US, we have to make sure that you don't have an rear end in a top hat first. please give us a doc telling us your entire life history.

No one is saying that.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

SatansBestBuddy posted:

If you're talking modern AAA games where all the focus is on shooting people, then yeah.

If you cast the net a little wider and reach back a little further, it's not all that hard to find good writing in video games.

Even in the small scope of modern triple A games there are still some gems, too. Prey and both Niers, for example.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

I remember seeing AA used to refer to developers like THQ before they shut down, but that it stopped being a thing precisely because developers like that ended up folding or being absorbed by larger corporations and put to working on the AAA titles.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Absurd Alhazred posted:

Love is a hell of a drug.

Love + Mormonism brainwashing apparently, since she's ex-that. I hate her equally to how much I feel bad for her. Actually maybe a bit less than that.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

I don't mind them making changes per se, but it would be a mistake to make Light at all sympathetic. That he's not is kind of key to the story.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

i am tim! posted:

I do kinda appreciate Drakengard for it's approach on the matter. That game makes drat sure you understand that the main character is exactly as bloodthirsty and broken a person as you would expect someone that kills thousands to be.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-J4f6OrxzsU

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

cat doter posted:

what I'm really wondering about is if my favourite critic will suck my dick if I dress it up like sonic the hedgehog

I'm pretty sure Hbomberguy will do that, yes.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

RareAcumen posted:

"Hey, wait a second. My foot shouldn't be bent that way, actually!" *My leg rotates 540° clockwise, cracking back into place and no longer being cerulean* "Boy, good thing I just decided to stop being injured, much like reading youtube comments!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4XYJrUnoeY

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

MisterBibs posted:

I get it (I follow him, aware of his abused past, etc) but I wish I could better understand the headspace of it, for lack of a better term. Specifically, I wish I understood the lack of some sort of internal "Self, something here is dangerously wrong and we need to change something right now" at some point before he's eating 2500 calories a meal. Like, sure, if you already are at that stage you've developed a learned helplessness, but before that?

I'm not making fun of him, I'm just :psyduck: about how someone gets to that point.

That's like asking why a cancer patient doesn't just choose to stop growing tumors. Not a 1:1 obviously, but a mental disorder is not really all that different from any other disorder someone might find themselves having.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

MisterBibs posted:

Why are we not bringing up the base level issue, that Mac and Cheese is inferior to shells and cheese?

:agreed:

If I'm going boxed macaroni I go shells and white cheddar or bust.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Arcsquad12 posted:

You can always count on Tim Curry to be the best thing in a bad film.

This is 100% true.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yMy7JuGpJM

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Kim Justice posted:

It's more understandable if we're talking about a guy who, I dunno, has videos where he'd like to talk to you about the Jewish Question or whatever...but not really video games? Seems extreme.

No, GamerGaters are pretty universally awful and should absolutely be shunned.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Kim Justice posted:

Guys, we all have our preferences and they're pretty much hardcoded in. And saying that it's the same as not wanting to date a black person is spurious as hell...like, there's so many factors you've not considered. What about starting a family, say? Maybe someone wants a kid, they'd like to be a biological father or something along those lines...we trans women can't provide that because we don't have uteruses. You don't get that in other cases...

As much as I'm sure things would be great if everyone had a degree of attraction to everyone else, that's just not the way things work. Some people are attracted to us (You know what type of porn is just about as popular as straight porn?), some people are not. Physical attraction...it's not that deep. And to say that not being attracted to a certain someone makes you a transphobe, or a homophobe, or a racist...sorry, that's just completely ridiculous.

The fertility thing is bullshit. Outside of the fact that there are other options for raising children, you never see this being brought up with regards to cis women even though there are numerous ways a cis woman can be infertile. That it's only ever brought up in relation to trans women makes it absolutely transphobic.

The attraction thing is irrelevant because no one is saying anyone should be forced to date a trans person. Just that, if someone is turned off purely because the prospective partner is trans, it might be because of deeply held transphobic views, and that the person in question should probably do some soul searching.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Kim Justice posted:

Nah mate, no one's forcing you to date a trans person! Just that you're probably a transphobe if you don't want to!

I mean, yes? In exactly the same way that someone is very likely racist if they wouldn't date a black person. These attitudes don't come from nowhere, and if you're suggesting they're purely biological constructs that just happen to exist within some people, separate from societal influences, I'd point you to that one black dude that's converted several hardcore KKK members into not being racists.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Yardbomb posted:

I still occasionally wonder what ever happened to Habermann after they vanished.

The dude continued to do LPs on his channel after leaving SA, then up and deleted it. I think he was supposed to transfer control of it to a friend but it fell through or something.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

The Vosgian Beast posted:

A good game can be buggy as poo poo. For instance, Fallout New Vegas

Contrary to popular opinion, FNV is not a buggy game. They did a good job with patching it.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

MisterBibs posted:

You're proving your own argument wrong, though, because even with formerly popular games, there's no reason to keep the older stuff around.

World Of Warcraft? No, you don't actually want servers with earlier versions on it. You think you do, because you've forgotten all the poo poo like weapon skills, only one class being allowed to tank, grinding mobs to level being optimal, and a whole bunch of other poo poo. Which is why Blizzard won't do it (because it won't retain players and get shut down), and you won't commit to a pirated server that you know will be shut down.

You can totally play Halo in multiplayer right now. Just play the one everyone has moved on to. Yeah, it'll happen to current-gen consoles too, when everyone has moved on current+1. Things get obsoleted.

I too remember the time when games weren't on Steam or GoG. If you couldn't find it, you just shrugged and moved on to something else. Kinda like with, you know, Battleforge.

"No, you don't actually want to play this game that you want to play."

Great argument.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Viewtiful Jew posted:

Except when it comes to very particular versions of fighting games then Phil is actually a savant at like one or two of them.

Even that's up-selling him too much. In that one particular SF version he managed to place third in the tournament he participated in.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Calaveron posted:

I mean the game gave me the currency for free and I used it to buy a loot box and I was satisfied with what I got but not enough to feel like I had to spend money to get ahead in the game, nobody's forcing you

This is a stupid argument because, yes, you didn't feel forced to. That doesn't mean other people didn't. The entire point of the lootbox system, and all the research that goes into gambling-related stuff, is to prey on human psychology. People with addictive personalities have much harder times not buying into the system and that's a bad thing when doing so requires actual money.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Spark That Bled posted:

If they could afford all the microtransactions?

There have been plenty of great games released without microtransactions this year. Even in the triple A scene.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

BigRed0427 posted:

Like the only games that actually worked with it was Kenect sports and Just Dance. Otherwise...That thing never worked.

Was anyone even developing for it?

D4 was a Kinect game. :(

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Kim Justice posted:

If you fancy 15 minutes of misery, check out my new vid on a very dark Spectrum game. Gaining more traction than I expected:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g-la83RpEc

An excellent video as always, Kim. Impressed by your ability to spin a video's worth out of a game that definitely doesn't deserve it.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Pull up thread, pull up! ...No, not on the diapers!!

gently caress.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Calaveron posted:

Isn't the babadook thing just based off a Netflix genre goof and it's actually super homophobic to make It and Babadook homosexuality metaphors

The Netflix thing was a goof but I think it was mostly queer people boosting the meme so I wouldn't necessarily call it homophobic. The It one was trying to force the same lightning twice and it just didn't work.

I think the poster's point was that we're starved for queer horror to the point of making memes where decidedly non-queer horror things are queer so we could do with some actual queer horror a la Elm Street 2.

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Yeah, this is the first thing that really makes me worried that Contra is going to fall down the right-wing rabbit hole. Debating them? Fine, I can sort of see where she's coming from. Literally raising money for them? Um, no.

Kim Justice posted:

Funny that angry "how dare she talk with the other side, what's she doing? SHE'S NOT GOOD AT DEBATING REEEEE" poo poo like this just so happens to only really come up when it's Contra. If it's not getting a profile on a mainstream site by some person lots of people hate, it's this. Good golly gee whiz, I wonder why on earth that could be?

No one is saying she's a bad debater? Just that debating these sorts of people is ultimately pointless. And as I and a few others have mentioned, any good coming from her potentially have convinced a few people is more than undone by her raising money for them.

quote:

Anyway, few points: Contra and Theryn Meyer have been quite friendly for some time. They've done videos and streams before even, and they went just fine, so saying it's just gonna be some 2v1 punching bag job is...um, probably not right. Generally they're all friendly with each other and do lots of batting on Twitter and so on - both Theryn and Blaire went savage on another right-wing trans woman, Zuzanna Mroz, who made a godawful video that tried to make out Contra to have paedophile symapthies because of jokes she'd made (if you want a conservative trans woman who is a real piece of poo poo, that one's right there). Watching the videos of people like Theryn or indeed Blaire would probably stop the "THESE ARE MASSIVE BIGOT DEMONS" stuff but I've tried that before and don't want to do it again as obviously most people here are just content with masturbating all over RationalWiki. Anyway, blah blah blah, let's have a go at the trans leftist who's talking to people who are politically different.

Meyer's and Blaire's videos are horrid garbage. That you have to defend them by saying "look at this other person that's worse!" then you're defending the wrong people.

quote:

Seriously like gently caress would this be happening if instead of Contra it was Hbomb or Shaun or Dan Olson or whoever.

Yes? But I doubt we'll ever see because they're not trying to be buddy-buddy with memelord fascists.

Genocyber fucked around with this message at 04:47 on Nov 27, 2017

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Kim Justice posted:

*sigh* I do not recall ever saying that Blaire White was a fan of Islam. I know she has videos regarding Islam, I've seen the bloody things - I even mentioned them. My main point of contention was with sexpig (as usual) constantly posting hysterical nonsense, muddying up the whole timeline and just flat out making bollocks up - it was you who then chose to go through her Twitter feed and find a bunch of tweets with her opinions on Islam like they're some massive truth bomb.

So, ok! Blaire White doesn't much care for Islam. She especially doesn't care for the way that LGBT people are treated in Islamic countries. Happy now? Good. Now gently caress off.

And in any case, I was mostly referencing the poo poo he was saying about Theryn Meyer, not Blaire.

I like how you continue to sweep her being an awful bigot under the rug. That sure is a character quality that makes sense to ignore when talking about a person!

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Kim Justice posted:

I literally said she doesn't care about Islam and you can take your impressions from that how you want - I've not even stated mine (for the record, they're not exactly the videos of hers I care for. It's not that I try to avoid them just that I don't agree). I mean, if I wanted to sweep it under the carpet I'd probably try to say that she actually isn't in any way Islamophobic at all and whatever, which I would fail at.

You're right, which is why you seem to doing the somewhat more effective thing of belittling it as much as possible. You can't separate things like hatred and bigotry from conservative thought because they're pretty much the bedrock of it (of modern conservatism, at least in America, I'll say).

quote:

From an LGBT perspective...y'know, there are problems. As one example, the maximum penalty for sodomy in Saudi Arabia is still Stoning. In 2017...like, that's a serious problem and I do not think it's Islamophobic to point that out (especially because such things are the issue of the government and the criminal justice system there as opposed to the person in the street).

But it is Islamophobia to point out that and only that, and to use it as a value judgement on Muslim people/justification for treating them lovely. Saudia Arabia has anti-sodomy laws? So did (/even still do, I think) some states in America, with police setting up sting operations purposefully to arrest gay men as far back as the long lost age of the 90s. But you never see these people mention these instances, because the point is not to try and fix these issues but provide rationalization for hating Muslim people.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Genocyber
Jun 4, 2012

Arcsquad12 posted:

First thing that springs to mind is Katawa Shojo from a few years ago. It was based around characters living from physical disabilities and mental psychoses including depression.

Isn't that one creepy and fetishistic, though? I've not played it myself but that's usually what I've heard about it.

  • Locked thread