Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
DentArthurDent
Aug 3, 2010

Diddums
Back in 1999 the New Yorker did a great piece on Lynch's failed attempts to get Mulholland Drive developed as a TV show. The article was written before he turned it into a movie. It's a really fascinating look at Lynch's process, the difficulty of dealing with TV networks (especially if you are an iconoclast like David Lynch), and more. I remember reading the article when it came out and, as a huge Twin Peaks fan, being very sad he was not getting to make another TV show. However, since he did manage to turn it into a brilliant movie, I guess things turned out fine in the end...

http://www.lynchnet.com/mdrive/newyorker.html

Original source (paywall):
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1999/09/06/creative-differences

Also, I really like Fire Walk With Me as well, and I think the best way to approach it is as a David Lynch movie and not as a Twin Peaks movie. It doesn't do a particularly good job of wrapping up plots from the show, many of the great characters from the series get little or no screen time, and even the town itself seems to be not all that important. But as a delivery system for Lynch's weirdness it's just great.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread