|
Nintendo Kid posted:Since when does being near matter when there's robust transit?
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2015 23:45 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 18:32 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:What does that have to do with good public transit? I understand you're probably from some lovely place where being on the transit line means taking 2 hours from your sprawl-hell but that's not how it works in cities with good transit.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2015 00:03 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:Not really, many gentrifying neighborhoods aren't particularly near people's existing jobs, they're just nicer to live in or fashionable. Now, after a bit of gentrification going on they tend to BECOME places where there is local work that people continue to arrive for, but that's not why people started showing up. The main drive for gentrification here was industry scaling up and moving out of the older inner-city suburbs. The working class jobs moved outwards (or disappeared) at the same time as the CBD became a bigger source of employment. Employment concerns weren't the only factor (the increasing prevalence of cars, the post-war migration boom played their parts too) but it was the biggest.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2015 00:54 |
|
PT6A posted:Interpreting it in the most bizarre way possible just to start an argument doesn't seem to make much sense.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2015 02:37 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:This is how the word works in most of the world, Australia and maybe New Zealand are unique in having teeny-tiny city propers and then a whole bunch of effectively neighborhoods that are sort of in the same government.
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2015 04:14 |