|
TwoQuestions posted:And if so, why? What policies and costs are justified to keep people alive (housed, fed, free from pollution)? without getting into the arguments of where rights come from, you are making the assumption that the right must be a positive one - as in, society must move to ensure the right can be freely exercised - rather than a negative one - as in, society need not guarantee your exercise of the right, but cannot actively halt it. In free speech terms the negative right would be "the government can't censor you" whereas the positive right would be "hey you need to give this guy airtime so he can submit his views". Here, the negative right would be the government can't just kill you on a whim, whereas the positive right would be the government needs to provide the things you mention.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2015 05:04 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 21:32 |