|
If a negative right to life means I have an obligation not to take positive actions that I can reasonably foresee will lead to another's death, then it's pretty obvious I can't take the positive actions required to chase a man and his starving family from my fields and prevent them from getting food. In fact, it seems like I can't even take the positive action to fence off the land in the first place and bar anyone else from making a living on it.
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 00:59
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 04:15 |
|