|
laffing at all the poo poo for brains nerd idiots itt and itf who dont think the apple watch will be a massive success because they think they know better or something loving idiots
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 14:18
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 10:50 |
|
|
this ipod? lame iphone? sucks nobody will buy these products *strokes beard*
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 15:40
|
|
|
apple watch will define the market for wearable technology and will normalise the idea of wearing a coloured screen on your wrist its a fact its coming deal with it
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 15:41
|
|
|
maniacdevnull posted:will it normalize the idea of charging your watch multiple times a day? yes
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 15:47
|
|
|
get this: before iphones people didnt expect to have to charge their phone every day
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 15:47
|
|
|
why are you laughing do you think im wrong or something
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 16:03
|
|
|
My Linux Rig posted:I dunno I'll reserve judgement until I see a use case for it that's actually really good other then look I can check what time it is a watch is for telling the time
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 16:11
|
|
|
young shutin nerd declares: "people i know dont wear watches"
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 17:15
|
|
|
having a good giggle at all the idiot poo poo nerds hastily applying their reverse gear as apple reveal a range of beautiful, reasonably priced timepieces to suit every need and budget
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
Jalumibnkrayal posted:Assuming the movement weighs nothing: where is this from
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2015 23:57
|
|
|
Jalumibnkrayal posted:Weight of the case (55g) from apple.com, then I plugged it into a gold scrap calculator. ok so rather than copying some idiots posts from elsewhere you are, in fact, literally sat there working out the cost of the raw materials of this watch and attempting to prove that apple is somehow being dishonest by charging more for the product than these base costs in some weird money making scam you loving moron oval office
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:03
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:your mad yes i am yospos used to be for laughing at these people now youre here, posting close yospos
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:07
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:i still think if you drop 17k on a watch it should be something a little more classy and long lasting than a tech gadget watch the people paying $17k for a watch dont give a tinker's toss what you think
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:11
|
|
|
Wootman posted:don't you have a phone why did you buy a phone to tell the time with
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:15
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:oh no my posting career its nothing to do with your posting or thoughts or aspirations its the understanding that your musings on what constitutes a 'good $17,000 watch' are utterly irrelevant
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:18
|
|
|
Wootman posted:wtf answer the question
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:18
|
|
|
Wootman posted:i bought a phone to contact my friends and family. i dont believe you
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:19
|
|
|
an easy way to spot an idiot is to look for people who believe the apple watch's purpose is to 'solve the problem' of taking your phone out of your pocket
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
Stymie posted:i agree, that's not the iwatch's purpose but the problem is that it has no purpose so people are just casting about to try and find one its purpose is to be a desirable object that people will want to own
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:which one did you order im not getting one
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:38
|
|
|
Stymie posted:which is to say no purpose at all, since that's every object under capitalism it does have a purpose for the end user
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
ill probably get the third version in a couple of years
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
Wootman posted:*buys a 17,000 dollar smartwatch* youre an idiot
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:41
|
|
|
Beast of Bourbon posted:apple won't "see" the data, apple will "collect" and "monetize" the data. agreed. this is why im waiting for the ubuntu watch.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:41
|
|
|
Wootman posted:ok explain no
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
Wootman posted:list 10 purposes for the apple tm watch right now no
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:44
|
|
|
zen death robot posted:the iphone was pretty obviously useful when it was introduced, as was the ipad, this i'm much more skeptical on and think its sort of a fad that'll be forgotten but who knows yeah there were definitely no idiots describing these products as too expensive/not functional enough/more expensive than their base metal components when they were launched
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:45
|
|
|
Stymie posted:and there were people who immediately jumped onto the iphone/ipad bandwagon despite deficiencies of the originals so what so people applying these same bad opinions to this latest product sector can be safely ignored because they do not know what theyre talking about
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:50
|
|
|
Wootman posted:give me 10 reasons to own a smartwatch why?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:53
|
|
|
Wootman posted:because i want to see what you can possibly do with one. i think there's an important part of you missing
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
Stymie posted:and therefore so can the opinions of those who uncritically support it, so what no, because the people who thought that the iphone and ipad were good products have been proven correct
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:56
|
|
|
Stymie posted:in retrospect, yes what 'evidence' is this?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:58
|
|
|
Wootman posted:because those are actually useful, a lovely watch isn't! youre saying that now after several years, umpteen million units of each sold, and two product categories defined yet you still think you know better because youre a loving moron
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 00:59
|
|
|
Wootman posted:okay? so what? doesn't mean they can do it again. lol ok
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 01:02
|
|
|
Stymie posted:the defined existence of competing products with the same feature set if there are products existing now with the 'same feature set' as the apple watch, then there were products existing at the time of the iphone and the ipad that also had the same feature set of each
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 01:03
|
|
|
Wootman posted:keep slurping on apple's semen man this post is what yospos has become. this is why yospos must be closed. tonight.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 01:04
|
|
|
Sniep posted:cool down captain quick, remember, this is also what yospos was born of.... yes, in other places
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 01:06
|
|
|
Wootman posted:the only thing you have said is "apple was sucessful before tehy can be come successful again!" which is dumb as gently caress because the iphone and ipad make sense to exist so duh people are gonna want it. a smartwatch, not really. look at this post. look at it.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 01:07
|
|
|
Garbd posted:gas
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 01:08
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 10:50 |
|
|
Stymie posted:this is objectively incorrect wrong there is not a single thing that the iphone or ipad did that could not be done already on alternative products apple's success is the way they offer these features
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2015 01:19
|
|