|
Fruity Gordo posted:At what point do you think the contempt for you will be so crait that you'll have to create a new account and have another craic? That's a serious question? Really? Never. Some people take internet forums seriously. I think that means you mate - not me.
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 06:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 22:51 |
|
|
No, it's a legit question, MUYB. If you want me to look like a fuckwit, explain why I'm a fuckwit. Where did I say she or her people wrote the thing, rather than that they jumped on it as an opportunity for publicity? If you can't find it, pls let me know why it's illegitimate to say that she's an opportunist. And just for extra fun, pls explain why you've apparently given up on your strident feminist critique of making fun of Jackie Lambie
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 06:39
|
|
|
Gough Suppressant posted:Splode, I know you're excited because Fruity's back and she's the only poster here who can make you look intelligent by comparison, but you should probably just quit while you're only this far behind. You're enormously weird
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 06:40
|
|
|
Like, you're weirder than me. And I'm really loving weird. I can at least follow the argument I'm having.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 06:41
|
|
|
Fruity Gordo posted:No, it's a legit question, MUYB. If you want me to look like a fuckwit, explain why I'm a fuckwit. Where did I say she or her people wrote the thing, rather than that they jumped on it as an opportunity for publicity? If you can't find it, pls let me know why it's illegitimate to say that she's an opportunist. And just for extra fun, pls explain why you've apparently given up on your strident feminist critique of making fun of Jackie Lambie Fruity, what did you think you were replying to when you quoted my post saying that unfounded claims of her writing it herself are loving offensive? I'm guessing you misread and thought I was referring to it being an exterior false flag thing?
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 06:43
|
|
|
Like I read the entire thread I'm posting in.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 06:43
|
|
|
Fruity Gordo posted:Like I read the entire thread I'm posting in. If you read the entirety of auspol then you're definitely not the less weird one. If we can agree on the fact that she probably didn't send it herself, can we also agree on the fact that for the person receiving the death threat, it probably doesn't change the experience very much whether it actually came from an islamic extremist or a christian extremist posing as one. Gough Suppressant fucked around with this message at 06:50 on Mar 1, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 06:44
|
|
|
Fruity Gordo posted:No, it's a legit question, MUYB. If you want me to look like a fuckwit, explain why I'm a fuckwit. Where did I say she or her people wrote the thing, rather than that they jumped on it as an opportunity for publicity? If you can't find it, pls let me know why it's illegitimate to say that she's an opportunist. And just for extra fun, pls explain why you've apparently given up on your strident feminist critique of making fun of Jackie Lambie It's not about making fun of jacqui lambie, she is a certifiable loving moron, it's about making light of the fact that she received death threats. The only reason I ended up bringing gender into it at all is because women receive more death threats than men do for the same behaviour.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 06:52
|
|
|
Oh my loving god, take it to IRC and stop loving up what started off as a great thread you goddamn goons.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 06:59
|
|
|
Gough Suppressant posted:Fruity, what did you think you were replying to when you quoted my post saying that unfounded claims of her writing it herself are loving offensive? I'm guessing you misread and thought I was referring to it being an exterior false flag thing? No, I understood that you were affronted by the notion that she invented death threats against her. I agree that she didn't need to invent death threats bc she it a target. My point is well established by now but I guess I need to do it again because the delicate and idiosyncratically useless brains of men need to be considered and accounted for. Lambie is a public figure Public figures get hatemail Lambie is a public woman figure They get more hatemail Fascist public figures who advance hate get hatemail They also get love mail from white supremacists Woman fascists get more of both When you're the most public face of a certain kind of fascism you might be more of a target for hatemail and lovemail Who do we know sends ISIS emails to public figures? Foreign ISIS freaks Domestic ISIS wannabe freaks Domestic white supremacists legit trying to incite a race war Domestic white supremacist internet trolls Foreign white supremacists trying to incite race wars I'm pretty loving sure I implied all of that in my posts itt but if you have any further questions feel free to pay me cash money for my expertise in being able to loving read.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:00
|
|
|
Mattjpwns posted:Oh my loving god, take it to IRC and stop loving up what started off as a great thread you goddamn goons.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:02
|
|
|
Mattjpwns posted:Oh my loving god, take it to IRC and stop loving up what started off as a great thread you goddamn goons. Thread title has a gendered slur in it so it was poo poo from the get-go imho
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:03
|
|
|
I had such high hopes for this thread 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:03
|
|
Waaaah the Christians are out to get me
|
Quantum Mechanic posted:I had such high hopes for this thread Ahaahahahahahahahahahahaa You know what you are dealing with here. God that was funny.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:07
|
|
|
C U Next Thread
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:12
|
|
|
Quantum Mechanic posted:I had such high hopes for this thread Hope is the first step on the road to
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:12
|
|
|
Gough Suppressant posted:If you read the entirety of auspol then you're definitely not the less weird one. If Jackie Lambie reads her public email she is stupider than I gave her credit for, and her staff are more sadistic and opportunist. By the sounds of Seek Other Candidates post I probs gave them more credit than they were due
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:13
|
|
|
Quantum Mechanic posted:I had such high hopes for this thread  Make weed legal imo
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:14
|
|
|
Anidav posted:C U Next Thread
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:14
|
|
|
Anidav posted:C U Next Thread Noice
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:15
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Thread title has a gendered slur in it so it was poo poo from the get-go imho you are wrong
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:16
|
|
|
Someone get xylo to implement a new rule wherein upon the third reply between two people it has to be taken to PM or both parties are banned
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:20
|
|
|
Anidav posted:C U Next Thread
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:20
|
|
|
Fruity Gordo posted:I've received a fuckload of internet death threats for about six years...
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:21
|
|
|
 Welcome back, Fruity.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:23
|
|
|
Gough Suppressant posted:It's not about making fun of jacqui lambie, she is a certifiable loving moron, it's about making light of the fact that she received death threats. The only reason I ended up bringing gender into it at all is because women receive more death threats than men do for the same behaviour. Lmao thanks for proving what I already suspected http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:23
|
|
|
Avshalom posted:
Same.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:24
|
|
|
QLD has best goon meets, QLD has best state elections, February is the shortest month and therefore the best thread. QLD is therefore superior.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:24
|
|
|
hello.jpg
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:24
|
|
|
Auspol March: Thrills, Spills and Empty Posts
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:26
|
|
|
Anidav posted:QLD has best goon meets, QLD has best state elections, February is the shortest month and therefore the best thread. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:26
|
|
|
pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg pony.jpg
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:27
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:28
|
|
|
Murodese posted:Someone get xylo to implement a new rule wherein upon the third reply between two people it has to be taken to PM or both parties are banned What if it's an intelligent, sensible dialectic between respectful parties that contributes to broader thread discussions and doesn't descend into childish ad hominem attacks?
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
It could happen!
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
hiddenmovement posted:What if it's an intelligent, sensible dialectic between respectful parties that contributes to broader thread discussions and doesn't descend into childish ad hominem attacks? you must be new around here
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
Mattjpwns posted:you must be new around here
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:31
|
|
|
hiddenmovement posted:What if it's an intelligent, sensible dialectic between respectful parties that contributes to broader thread discussions and doesn't descend into childish ad hominem attacks? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:32
|
|
|
Avshalom posted:he's also a moron who doesn't understand how roads work quote:I AM A MORON WHO DOESN'T UNDERSTAND HOW ROADS WORK e: Did someone drop USD$9.95 to do that?
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 22:51 |
|
|
Look I'm sorry I took a month off and all of you idiots forgot what good posting looks like but it's not my fault.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2015 07:33
|
|