|
BJ can we get a minute's notice before thread switching? I lost a (fantastic!) post on the understated elegance of some of the new commons revealed today.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 20:06 |
|
|
# ¿ May 20, 2024 23:22 |
|
Entropic posted:http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/latest-developments/days-future-future-fate-reforged-2015-02-27 For instance, Atarka (featured in one of their decks) was meant to cost 6 instead of 7 according to one of the R&D videos.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 22:48 |
|
Which begs the question of why it's formated that way. It seems very "feel bad" and unintuitive for the unsuspecting caster.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 00:00 |
|
qbert posted:Also another question. I didn't realize Exploit allowed you to sacrifice the creature you just cast. Will the 2nd triggered ability even go on the stack if you choose to say, cast Sidisi and then sac it to its own Exploit trigger? It will. According to Gottlieb:"yes, she can exploit herself"
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 00:02 |
|
Symphonie posted:
i think art is pretty
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 06:24 |
|
Entropic posted:What are you killing with this that Valorous Stance doesn't hit? It's also more reliable than Stance because of (opposing) Stances.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 06:30 |
|
Angry Grimace posted:Incredibly useless looking "Mythic" Cool, throwbacks in a time travel set.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 19:27 |
|
Wall chat got me to realize the Onslaught Wall of Mulch was a hideous photoshop edit of a painting (I thought it was a bad photoshop original). The original was restored in the M15 reprint.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 20:24 |
|
rabidsquid posted:Black doesn't have a lot of choices and they're really predicated on creature type, which makes it a neck and neck race between the Snake Wall and the Skeleton Wall. My pet black wall would be a 1/1 flying deathtouch defender for B. A fetid rat corpse strapped to a balloon as art.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 20:28 |
|
Hellsau posted:I wonder how much other hideous Onslaught block art was due to overuse of digital manipulation? I think Ron Spencer paints with traditional art materials
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 20:32 |
|
mr. mephistopheles posted:Actually I'd be willing to bet that the M15 version looks better because of Photoshop. "I was told to make a wall of forest detritus and man-made odds and ends. Later somebody went around my AD and got some poor dude in Production to mutilate it in Photoshop. Thus the illustration you see here and the card don't quite match. This, too, sometimes happens, dear ones. Just take the money and move on. " http://www.deviantart.com/art/Wall-of-Mulch-70658352
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 21:06 |
|
So which side up is the correct way to sleeve your cards? Bottom of card to bottom of sleeve or the opposite?
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2015 23:57 |
|
suicidesteve posted:Perfect fit with the opening on the bottom of the card, regular sleeve on top facing up. But really, as long as they're uniform it doesn't matter. Curious about the reason for the differentiation.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 00:03 |
|
Changes F2P Magic game https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUjnNUy0H1I "Enter the world’s most popular strategy game with Magic Duels™ Origins, an all-new, free-to-play digital experience. Build powerful decks from an ever-growing collection of earnable cards, and sharpen your skills in a variety of unique solo and multiplayer modes. Begin your adventure here!" http://news.xbox.com/2015/03/games-idxbox-gdc-2015 "Magic the Gathering: F2P (Wizards of the Coast): The world’s most beloved collectible card game goes free-to-play! It will make its console debut first on Xbox one"
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 01:10 |
|
Entropic posted:So this is just Duels of the Planeswalkers 2016, right? Probs. But with a new payment model. I doubt their complete yet accessible magic experience Hearthstone competitor is ready/will ever materialize, and the naming would be poor.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 01:17 |
|
Gyshall posted:Great move by Wizards, I think I got last years' Duels on my android tablet and it was crack. I found the interface incredibly tedious. Lack of an upkeep and other steps was also annoying.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 01:26 |
|
Yo wizards where the evening spoilers at?
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 03:35 |
|
Who won the workshops mirror? Just missed it.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 04:55 |
|
That's a nasty card, and randomly swingy in a way I don't like. I mean, 10 life? Good thing it's not "spells"
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 08:19 |
|
Hey Sorin, what the gently caress are you actually doing on Tarkir?
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 08:41 |
|
Dragons got him brooding
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 08:50 |
|
Jeez some of the intro pack art is so much more bad rear end
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 08:56 |
|
Bombastic trailer for the Origins game, featuring child Chandra. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saNAgbhd2gw I doubt the featured card artwork (like Vengvine) has any implications for what the paper set will include.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 22:16 |
|
mcmagic posted:I see what you did there WOTC making Foe Razor Regent a 4/5... What?
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 22:19 |
|
mcmagic posted:Because if it was 5/5 it would be REALLY REALLY good. Yeah much better, but at 7 mana still hardly playable I think.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 22:21 |
|
Emerson Cod posted:So, with Evolving Wilds spoiled it looks like we won't be getting enemy fetches in Dragons. However, there are 5 spare slots on the sheet since the official set size is 264. Can someone explain how we know the number of land slots?
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 22:43 |
|
Angry Grimace posted:The order of cards by color and type always stays the same and is listed in alphabetical order. Basic lands are numbered separately from nonbasic lands and put at the very end (there are always 3 of each basic in large sets). Therefore, if Evolving Wilds is 249/264, there aren't any non-basics after it. Not that it matters for Zendikar fetchlands, but isn't it 248 on EW? It's tiny, maybe I'm wrong.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2015 22:53 |
|
Traditionally how playable have these sort of abilities been? The Dragonspeaker reduction was a bit beefier. E:i guess it's effectively a worse, more expensive conditional elvish mystic that can eat goblin tokens
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 01:49 |
|
bhsman posted:New Goblin Sharpshooter? I dislike that art quite a bit
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 05:25 |
|
Count Bleck posted:How can you hate that art? It's amazing. Because: Madmarker posted:Because OG Sharpshooter is best Sharpshooter. but seriously, it just looks like silver bordered card art to me
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 05:38 |
|
Still can't get over this poo poo >> >>
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 05:54 |
|
TheKingofSprings posted:I can't get over how there hasn't been a good Goblin printed in about 5 years ugh
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 05:56 |
|
Mini impulse
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 18:41 |
|
Entropic posted:i'm actually really excited by this. Yeah. Best current Standard cantrip?
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 18:45 |
|
Lieutenant Centaur posted:I'm putting 4 in every deck I own. it does synergize with itself, tbf
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 19:03 |
|
Next planeswalker has to be at least part green, right? Or have walker colors gone unrepresented in blocks before?
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 22:20 |
|
Art for upcoming spoiler
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2015 22:45 |
|
Minority Deport posted:
It looks like that Dragon's Maze Izzet card. E:dragonshift Rinkles fucked around with this message at 03:21 on Mar 6, 2015 |
# ¿ Mar 6, 2015 03:18 |
|
Any quick way of spotting fakes? You probably can't tell from the lovely picture, but the Hymns are much paler than newer cards and their backs a smidgeon redder. I was just wondering whether the print technique changed that much (other old cards tend to also be paler but these stood out). I don't have delusions of these being worth anything, just curious.
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2015 07:29 |
|
|
# ¿ May 20, 2024 23:22 |
|
Also found Siege Rhino's grand daddy
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2015 07:38 |