|
nielsm posted:This maybe... We use them in college. They're decent.
|
#
¿
Nov 8, 2015 22:18
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 9, 2024 01:12 |
|
|
If I wanted to print a negative as a negative what would I have to take into account with the positive paper? How does it work with filters? The Harman DPP tech sheet seems to say it's fine, and filters make a difference, but they only show a 3 1/2 filter. What about exposure times? Am I looking at longer or shorter exposure times? They say the paper is about ISO 1 to 3, how does this compare to regular multigrade paper? I know I could make test strips, but the paper seems quite expensive and I'm in a perpetual state of brokeness. I've just come into a negative that I much prefer as a negative image in comparison to a positive. I'd quite like to see it printed large in it's negative format. Maybe my first step should be printing the negative from a scan as the negative.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2016 18:33
|
|
|
nielsm posted:Considering the cost of direct positive paper, consider making an intermediate paper "negative", i.e. a regular positve print of your negative in the final size, then use that for contact printing. How would I contact print from, say, and 8x10 of a 35mm print? I have a regular print, but I don't know how I'd turn that into a negative, if that's what you're saying? Or how I could make a 35mm positive from the negative? I presume something transparent would be involved at some stage.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2016 19:18
|
|