|
some old hussy posted:I'll take any unclaimed teams should the situation arise. Same. I've not really followed the draft prospects but I can do some research if we end up with a huge need for "gms" I'm normally pretty good about posting on time too so there's that!
|
# ¿ Mar 6, 2015 14:16 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 04:04 |
|
swickles posted:johnfw50 I'll tentatively take the Bears, open for anyone else to take it between now and the start of the draft.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2015 04:28 |
|
Also people waste time with "I know my pick but going to sit on it for 8 hours to try and pull a trade!" and the whole thing gets obnoxious
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2015 12:52 |
|
So I've got two options here if anyone doesn't mind picking for me after Beer does? I'm going to be heading out for a few hours in about 30, I can send you my two choices in PM.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2015 20:13 |
|
Forever_Peace posted:I don't have pm but I'm pretty sure you can email me through our shared league. You're welcome to if nobody else is able. Just give me your choice for players in order and I'll give you the highest. Sent, thanks man.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2015 20:25 |
|
Forever_Peace posted:Alright Kettle I'm assuming you are away, so here I go on your behalf. Phone posting.thanks man!
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2015 21:36 |
|
I was considering grabbing armstead for the bears, because if he puts it together he'd be a perfect fit, but the bears can't afford to gamble on upside with so many holes. I say after taking white in the first.
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2015 01:04 |
|
Coldforge posted:Yeah, but some positions fall off a cliff early. I'm not super familiar with all the prospects so which positions are you talking about? I know Quarterback, Safety, and interior OL aren't too highly regarded this draft, any that I'm missing?
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2015 21:54 |
|
I thought DT was regarded as pretty deep this draft all in all? Maybe it's just there's more top level DTs but a larger drop off after them?
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2015 01:12 |
|
Forever_Peace posted:drat, hoping Abdullah would fall to the early 3rd. I got your back, same method I emailed you if you'd like.
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2015 16:30 |
|
Picked for Forever_Peace. No problem, glad to return the favor! Warcrimes is up
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2015 17:52 |
|
You son of a bitch, that was the one player I was holding out hope for
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2015 04:12 |
|
Back to back picks of guys who I was really, really, hoping would drop. Good picks guys. Danielle Hunter isn't a bad consolation prize, but he doesn't completely fit the Bears' needs. Sorry I had to sleep some yall, Jrizzle is up next!
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2015 14:05 |
|
Round 4 Pick (overall) 1 (100). Tennessee Titans 2 (101). New England Patriots (from Tampa Bay Buccaneers) 3 (102). Oakland Raiders 4 (103). Jacksonville Jaguars 5 (104). New York Jets 6 (105). Washington Redskins 7 (106). Chicago Bears 8 (107). Atlanta Falcons 9 (108). New York Giants 10 (109). Tampa Bay Buccaneers (from St. Louis Rams) 11 (110). Minnesota Vikings 12 (111). Cleveland Browns 13 (112). Seattle Seahawks (from New Orleans Saints) 14 (113). Philadelphia Eagles (from San Francisco 49ers through Buffalo Bills) 15 (114). Miami Dolphins 16 (115). Cleveland Browns (from Buffalo Bills) 17 (116). Houston Texans 18 (117). San Diego Chargers 19 (118). Kansas City Chiefs 20 (119). St. Louis Rams (from Philadelphia Eagles) 21 (120). Cincinnati Bengals 22 (121). Pittsburgh Steelers 23 (122). Baltimore Ravens (from Detroit Lions) 24 (123). Arizona Cardinals 25 (124). Carolina Panthers 26 (125). Baltimore Ravens 27 (126). San Francisco 49ers (from Denver Broncos) 28 (127). Dallas Cowboys 29 (128). Indianapolis Colts 30 (129). Green Bay Packers 31 (130). Seattle Seahawks 32 (131). New England Patriots 33 (132). San Francisco 49ers (compensatory selection) 34 (133). Denver Broncos (compensatory selection) 35 (134). Seattle Seahawks (compensatory selection) 36 (135). Cincinnati Bengals (compensatory selection) 37 (136). Baltimore Ravens (compensatory selection)
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2015 04:35 |
|
I promise I'm not an ole miss fan, but I think this is the BPA that fits a need for Chicago, and they need a lot of secondary players in general.
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2015 02:03 |
|
swickles posted:Round 5 order up: You got me all excited but there's still 20 some picks till I'm up again. Not that I even know who the hell I'm looking at. I have a list of guys I've heard of ocne or twice I plan to draft
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2015 23:38 |
|
I think if there's a guy you really like you should take them because at the 5th round level it's all just slight differences between how you view a prospect. Hell anything past the 3rd I think "value" starts to become overrated and you really should consider scheme fit, need, upside, etc. over "ranking". Plus, worst case you're going to get a worse Mock Draft Mock Grade for overdrafting a prospect, which should matter.... exactly not the gently caress at all for anyone. gently caress it, have fun with it
|
# ¿ Apr 12, 2015 16:10 |
|
Like all my stashes just went off the board in a row. I might be a bit if B4tBG is real quick. Finding 2 people is going to be rough when I dont know poo poo about the draft
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2015 02:32 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 04:04 |
|
I had a few different ways I thought about going here, but I think continuing to address the secondary would pay off more than any other position right now.
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2015 15:22 |