|
Hello thread, You may use this thread to post any undeniable proof that God exists. Personally, I'm skeptical that such proof does exist, but I'm sure some of you can convince me otherwise!  Thanks and God bless. :]
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 17:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 12:52 |
|
|
A child's smile
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 17:51
|
|
|
http://www.zeitun-eg.org/zeitoun1.htm
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 17:54
|
|
|
Without God to create the universe how could this thread exist at all. The question itself is the evidence
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 17:57
|
|
|
and that god's name was Albert Einstein. makes you think
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 17:58
|
|
|
the meltwater scent in the breeze, on the first day of Spring
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 18:06
|
|
|
obstipator posted:Hello thread, The gauntlet has been cast, let none say I will not rise to this challenge.    Good day Sir.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 18:12
|
|
|
Concepts like logic and mathematics, which are both objective - i.e. they exist independent of our opinions - and intangible - i.e. they nevertheless exist only as concepts and not as a physical manifestation - could not exist without a deity who created them. If you disagree: where else could they possibly come from? check mate
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 18:12
|
|
|
Actually both logic and mathematics rest on just a few foundational assumptions that we can never really seem to prove as true, we just look at each other nervously and say "that makes sense." And that's where God lives, inside a little stone house with a chimney puffing away.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 18:17
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Actually both logic and mathematics rest on just a few foundational assumptions that we can never really seem to prove as true, we just look at each other nervously and say "that makes sense." And that's where God lives, inside a little stone house with a chimney puffing away. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 18:21
|
|
|
CheesyDog posted:A child's smile A girl's smile at seeing my dilz.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 18:29
|
|
|
I don't know if this is the right thread for this, sorry if I'm posting out of turn, but I'm trying to find out whether killing God makes you God or whether killing God just gets rid of him and you become known as the guy who killed God. I need to find out before Thursday night, Friday at the latest. Thanks
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Actually both logic and mathematics rest on just a few foundational assumptions that we can never really seem to prove as true, we just look at each other nervously and say "that makes sense." And that's where God lives, inside a little stone house with a chimney puffing away. Yes, it's those axioms I speak of from which we extract the rest. For what other than a god could define axioms, could set laws of the universe? Just call me G.W. Lewis
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 19:10
|
|
|
Please spell it G-d or else you will hurt my feelings.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 19:14
|
|
|
Sulla-Marius 88 posted:I don't know if this is the right thread for this, sorry if I'm posting out of turn, but I'm trying to find out whether killing God makes you God or whether killing God just gets rid of him and you become known as the guy who killed God. I need to find out before Thursday night, Friday at the latest. Thanks God is dead. God remains dead, and something awful poster Sulla-Marius 88 has killed him.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 19:48
|
|
|
Pretty much all of Africa. Man was created in Yahweh's image and we all aspire to gently caress things up and make life in general as horrible as things are over there.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 19:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 20:51
|
|
|
the female orgasm
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 21:16
|
|
|
Willie Tomg posted:the female orgasm They said undeniable
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 21:22
|
|
|
As a white man, the world was pretty much created for me. Somebody had to create the world. Therefore God exists.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 21:42
|
|
|
http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
Who's this god you are talking about?
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 22:04
|
|
:I'd like to borrow $200M
|
Yahweh made Hitler to unite us after he saw Jesus' teachings had failed but ww2 proved to him that we reject its protection so it has abandoned us.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
 Checkmate
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 22:21
|
|
|
God exists as a imagined concept in your head and therefore has a - if very transient and immaterial - type of existence. Fake edit: I was expecting goatse. Mood: disappointed.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 22:23
|
|
|
Religion is based on Faith. Faith is believing without knowing. To prove the existence of God, you paradoxically prove there is no God, as you shatter Faith. Only through unknowing can you know God is out there.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
PCOS Bill posted:Religion is based on Faith. Faith is believing without knowing. To prove the existence of God, you paradoxically prove there is no God, as you shatter Faith. Only through unknowing can you know God is out there. That's deep. I'd smoke to that if I had any  .
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 22:34
|
|
|
Haha, if you say you don't care if absolute truth exists then it directs you to buy tickets to Disney World. This site owns.
|
|
#
?
Mar 8, 2015 22:47
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Haha, if you say you don't care if absolute truth exists then it directs you to buy tickets to Disney World. This site owns. "He who hates correction is stupid." Wow. Really gave me a lot to think about.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 00:45
|
|
|
When you think about it, Jesus was a bastard and God was a deadbeat dad.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 02:31
|
|
|
Proof that God exists! http://youtubedoubler.com/dMrp America Inc. fucked around with this message at 05:18 on Mar 9, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 05:16
|
|
|
Doobies Dog Shack hasn't gone out of business yet.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 05:16
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:Doobies Dog Shack hasn't gone out of business yet. He said God not Satan.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 05:17
|
|
This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!
|
Once, I came up with an actual mathematical proof for God. Unfortunately, I was high and forgot to write it down.  I do still have the scorecard from when I played drunk minigolf, however. Hopefully my high-math is better than my drunk-math.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 06:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 07:14
|
|
|
Article 2. Whether it can be demonstrated that God exists? Objection 1. It seems that the existence of God cannot be demonstrated. For it is an article of faith that God exists. But what is of faith cannot be demonstrated, because a demonstration produces scientific knowledge; whereas faith is of the unseen (Hebrews 11:1). Therefore it cannot be demonstrated that God exists. Objection 2. Further, the essence is the middle term of demonstration. But we cannot know in what God's essence consists, but solely in what it does not consist; as Damascene says (De Fide Orth. i, 4). Therefore we cannot demonstrate that God exists. Objection 3. Further, if the existence of God were demonstrated, this could only be from His effects. But His effects are not proportionate to Him, since He is infinite and His effects are finite; and between the finite and infinite there is no proportion. Therefore, since a cause cannot be demonstrated by an effect not proportionate to it, it seems that the existence of God cannot be demonstrated. On the contrary, The Apostle says: "The invisible things of Him are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made" (Romans 1:20). But this would not be unless the existence of God could be demonstrated through the things that are made; for the first thing we must know of anything is whether it exists. I answer that, Demonstration can be made in two ways: One is through the cause, and is called "a priori," and this is to argue from what is prior absolutely. The other is through the effect, and is called a demonstration "a posteriori"; this is to argue from what is prior relatively only to us. When an effect is better known to us than its cause, from the effect we proceed to the knowledge of the cause. And from every effect the existence of its proper cause can be demonstrated, so long as its effects are better known to us; because since every effect depends upon its cause, if the effect exists, the cause must pre-exist. Hence the existence of God, in so far as it is not self-evident to us, can be demonstrated from those of His effects which are known to us. Reply to Objection 1. The existence of God and other like truths about God, which can be known by natural reason, are not articles of faith, but are preambles to the articles; for faith presupposes natural knowledge, even as grace presupposes nature, and perfection supposes something that can be perfected. Nevertheless, there is nothing to prevent a man, who cannot grasp a proof, accepting, as a matter of faith, something which in itself is capable of being scientifically known and demonstrated. Reply to Objection 2. When the existence of a cause is demonstrated from an effect, this effect takes the place of the definition of the cause in proof of the cause's existence. This is especially the case in regard to God, because, in order to prove the existence of anything, it is necessary to accept as a middle term the meaning of the word, and not its essence, for the question of its essence follows on the question of its existence. Now the names given to God are derived from His effects; consequently, in demonstrating the existence of God from His effects, we may take for the middle term the meaning of the word "God". Reply to Objection 3. From effects not proportionate to the cause no perfect knowledge of that cause can be obtained. Yet from every effect the existence of the cause can be clearly demonstrated, and so we can demonstrate the existence of God from His effects; though from them we cannot perfectly know God as He is in His essence.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 07:53
|
|
|
Which one?
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 14:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 15:01
|
|
|
i think, therefore i am (god)
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 16:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 12:52 |
|
|
What does G-d need with a starship?
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2015 17:00
|
|
